Paul third among Republican Presidential candidates...

TomCat84

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2009
Posts
3,414
Media
4
Likes
173
Points
148
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I don't think he is very secret about being muslim. Does the top of your head unhinge for BHO to just shit directly inside?

Even if he were a Muslim- what the fuck would the problem be? Last time I checked, there was no religious qualification test to become President. Bigot.
 

Horrible

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Posts
424
Media
6
Likes
2
Points
51
Location
Texas
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Even if he were a Muslim- what the fuck would the problem be? Last time I checked, there was no religious qualification test to become President. Bigot.

Exactly the point I was making.

Did you call me a bigot? I hope not, I hope that was intended for crustybone, or a generic statement as name calling is prohibited here. Not that I'll report you, its just impolite.
 

TomCat84

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2009
Posts
3,414
Media
4
Likes
173
Points
148
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Exactly the point I was making.

Did you call me a bigot? I hope not, I hope that was intended for crustybone, or a generic statement as name calling is prohibited here. Not that I'll report you, its just impolite.

Bigotry is also prohibited- and calling someone out for it is not. Thanks for playing. :smile:
 

Horrible

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Posts
424
Media
6
Likes
2
Points
51
Location
Texas
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Bigotry is also prohibited- and calling someone out for it is not. Thanks for playing. :smile:

Seeing as how I have not made a racially bigoted post, your name calling is entirely unfounded. Why is it, when you're in the wrong, you cannot apologize for it. Or, at the very least, acknowledge your folly? Is that an inherent trait of the liberals? Californians? Or were you just not raised with enough hugs?

On second thought, perhaps I should alert the mod team to your violation since you refuse to allow that you've made a mistake. Maybe they could show you where the error lies?

Nah, that's just not my style.

Next time you are out calling names maybe the next recipient of them won't be as nice as I am.
 

Klingsor

Worshipped Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Posts
10,888
Media
4
Likes
11,642
Points
293
Location
Champaign (Illinois, United States)
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
Nah, that's just not my style.

Next time you are out calling names maybe the next recipient of them won't be as nice as I am.

Regardless of your "style," it's just silly to call Obama a Muslim. And even sillier to suggest that he's open about it. I mean . . . what???

And notice that I only said "silly." See, I can be nice, too. :smile:
 

houtx48

Cherished Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Posts
6,899
Media
0
Likes
323
Points
208
Gender
Male
Ron Paul could lead Jesus Christ riding a donkey down Main Street and still could get elected President. Not now not ever.
 

Horrible

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Posts
424
Media
6
Likes
2
Points
51
Location
Texas
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male

Klingsor

Worshipped Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Posts
10,888
Media
4
Likes
11,642
Points
293
Location
Champaign (Illinois, United States)
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
Obama Admits He Is A Muslim - YouTube


Maybe you'll believe it when he says it himself?

Cool video clip. I think some of it must be missing, though. Could you give me a link to the second part? The part where Obama, you know, admits he is a Muslim?

Then again, since the guys who made the video admit themselves that he never said any such thing, never mind. :smile:

LOL. For a minute there, you almost had me going. Pretty funny, though.

Here, I got one for ya'.

Obama = Hitler
 
Last edited:

Horrible

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Posts
424
Media
6
Likes
2
Points
51
Location
Texas
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Cool video clip. I think some of it must be missing, though. Could you give me a link to the second part? The part where Obama, you know, admits he is a Muslim?

Then again, since the guys who made the video admit themselves that he never said any such thing, never mind. :smile:

LOL. For a minute there, you almost had me going. Pretty funny, though.

Here, I got one for ya'.

Obama = Hitler

In all seriousness, he does reference "his Muslim faith.". You can take it for what it's worth though, as the audio clip is just that, an audio clip.

Hitler was a lot more liked than obama ever has been.

Change It Back Tee Shirt
 

Klingsor

Worshipped Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Posts
10,888
Media
4
Likes
11,642
Points
293
Location
Champaign (Illinois, United States)
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
In all seriousness, he does reference "his Muslim faith.". You can take it for what it's worth though, as the audio clip is just that, an audio clip.

Hitler was a lot more liked than obama ever has been.

Change It Back Tee Shirt

It is definitely a clip--taken wildly out of context, as is most of that whole YouTube video. You don't seriously attach any significance to it, do you? I mean, I know we disagree and all, but c'mon!

And yes, Hitler had a following. Not only that, but as the old Nazi in The Producers says, "Not many people knew about it, but the Fuhrer vas a terrific dancer . . . "

Boy, that really tilts the balance, doesn't it? Nonetheless . . . call me crazy . . . but yeah, I still prefer Obama. :wink:
 

Horrible

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Posts
424
Media
6
Likes
2
Points
51
Location
Texas
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
It is definitely a clip--taken wildly out of context, as is most of that whole YouTube video. You don't seriously attach any significance to it, do you? I mean, I know we disagree and all, but c'mon!

And yes, Hitler had a following. Not only that, but as the old Nazi in The Producers says, "Not many people knew about it, but the Fuhrer vas a terrific dancer . . . "

Boy, that really tilts the balance, doesn't it? Nonetheless . . . call me crazy . . . but yeah, I still prefer Obama. :wink:


I know it is hard realizing when someone is joking on the internet, but yes, I was being facetious.

We actually do not disagree that often. Not as often as say... Tomcat, or Sargon, or Jason (whatever the advocate for the French's name is) And especially not Crustybone, <---------------This guy has nothing to say worth taking up space on the internet in my opinion.

All seriousness though, without looking up hard statistics, I believe Hitler had a MUCH larger following than Obama EVER has.

Also, in all seriousness, I would also rather be under Obama than Hitler.
 

dandelion

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Posts
13,297
Media
21
Likes
2,705
Points
358
Location
UK
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
All seriousness though, without looking up hard statistics, I believe Hitler had a MUCH larger following than Obama EVER has.

Also, in all seriousness, I would also rather be under Obama than Hitler.
Yes I'm sure he did, and happy to note you see the difficulty of popularity purchased by benefitting one part of the population at the expense of another. In Hitler's case, he espoused superiority of a master race which took in the great majority of the German population at the expense of the rest of europe. In the case of republicans, they seem to be taking the much more traditional tack of espousing the racial superiority of the rich and powerful as opposed to the common man.
 

Horrible

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Posts
424
Media
6
Likes
2
Points
51
Location
Texas
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
In the case of republicans, they seem to be taking the much more traditional tack of espousing the racial superiority of the rich and powerful as opposed to the common man.

"racial superiority of the rich and powerful?" I was not aware that "rich" was a race?

Nor was I aware that the "common man" was a race either.

I think Tomcat talked himself blue in the face trying to explain this to someone recently, that certain tax brackets were not races.

I do not understand how the two can be confused.
 

D_Hairy Truman

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2010
Posts
181
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
51
Ron Paul will not be elected president. neither will Rick Perry . or Michelle Bachman. their views on social issues are SO extreme they cant win the moderate middle , which is the majority of the voters.
Romney is a political chameleon or a mood ring; he changes every week.
fortunately we have Obama. He said and did the same thing about Libya that he said her would 1 month ago, 2 months ago and months before that.
AND IT WORKED TOO! ISNT THAT AMAZING ? QADDAFI AND BIN LADEN GONE THANKS TO FOREIGN POLICY FROM A LEFTIST, MARXIST, SOCIALIST KENYAN SECRET MUSLIM.
it doesnt matter which of the imbecilic twits gets the GOP nomination. together they couldnt lead a dog out of a mud puddle.

unfortunately i agree
 

karoo

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Posts
328
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
103
Sexuality
No Response
We had Bush 41, Bush 43, and now I like to call Obama Bush 44. Same old warmongering, excessive spending, spying on Americans, only more so.

If Paul can't get elected, it will only because Americans aren't ready for a principled, honest candidate who realizes that our imperialist foreign policy is going to ruin us, if our bloated thieving Federal behemoth doesn't first.

What would anyone with common sense have against; ending our murderous military adventures that create more mortal enemies for the U.S., revamping our confiscatory tax code and reforming our entitelment systems so there will be something left for future generations (except a crippling debt burden), ending the failed drug war that strips us of our civil liberties and criminalizes and cages hundreds of thousands of nonviolent citizens?

You critics of Paul need to check out his Youtube vids and find out where he's really coming from. If we don't elect this guy, these double-dealing smooth-talking self-serving crooks that so many seem to view as viable candidates are going to drive this country off a cliff.
 

dandelion

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Posts
13,297
Media
21
Likes
2,705
Points
358
Location
UK
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
"racial superiority of the rich and powerful?" I was not aware that "rich" was a race?

Nor was I aware that the "common man" was a race either.

I think Tomcat talked himself blue in the face trying to explain this to someone recently, that certain tax brackets were not races.

I do not understand how the two can be confused.
In the case of Hitler, there was a label which he placed on his favourite scapegoat, 'jew'. This seems to be accepted as a race, though in fact being jewish is a religion, a pattern of behaviour. Jews belong to all sorts of ethnic heritages in all different countries. The whole point of condemning Hitler is that the people he persecuted were no different in any significant way from anyone else. They were simply identifiable by a handy label. The history of antagonism between Jews and Christians seems to be a whipped up religious disagreement.

So now we have a different religious disagreement. Those who believe taking money from the poor is good, and those who believe taking money from the rich is good. The two sides are just as fervent in their religions. So how is this different to describing jews as a race, and describing persecuting them as racial persecution?

One reason Jews were persecuted was because they were often quite good at 'capitalism' and tended to be rich. Ironical then that now the 'capitalists' are especiallty favoured at the expense of the poor. Swings and roundabouts, but it is still the same process, whatever you call it, when it now operates in reverse.