Pelosi chomping at the bit for more spending

Discussion in 'Politics' started by B_starinvestor, Mar 11, 2009.

  1. B_starinvestor

    B_starinvestor New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Midwest
  2. houtx48

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes Received:
    35
    Gender:
    Male
    i think i am pretty liberal but nancy and the skelator reed need to go home and stfu.
     
  3. B_starinvestor

    B_starinvestor New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Midwest

    Hout, did a neocon hijack your computer and make a post in the Politics thread?

    Yippeee
     
  4. B_Nick8

    B_Nick8 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    11,912
    Likes Received:
    44
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New York City, by way of Marblehead, Boston and Ge
    Although nearly everything about Nancy Pelosi makes my skin crawl (would that hers were still medically able to do so), you would have a lot more credibility around here star if your sources weren't invariably taken from Fox News. Moreover, additional spending for the stimulus/recovery/save the planet comes as no surprise. Nearly every reputable economist I've heard discuss the crisis--regardless of their political leaning--had indicated that more spending is likely to be forthcoming and necessary.
     
  5. tripod

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Messages:
    5,250
    Albums:
    3
    Likes Received:
    465
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Statesville N.C.
    Marxist? That is total bullshit and borders on hysterical hyperbole. There isn't one Marxist in the entire U.S. government.
     
  6. las000005

    las000005 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    no comment
    She is old but I like her big tits.
     
  7. B_Nick8

    B_Nick8 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    11,912
    Likes Received:
    44
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New York City, by way of Marblehead, Boston and Ge
    Based on that statement, if you changed your percentage to 110%, I don't think anyone would argue with you.
     
  8. B_starinvestor

    B_starinvestor New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Midwest
    I just puked.

    BTW, they're fake, like the rest of her.
     
  9. B_Nick8

    B_Nick8 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    11,912
    Likes Received:
    44
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New York City, by way of Marblehead, Boston and Ge
    Really. Everyone knows only Republicans can afford fake boobs.

    Or, in GW's case, real ones. :-D
     
    #9 B_Nick8, Mar 11, 2009
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2009
  10. tripod

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Messages:
    5,250
    Albums:
    3
    Likes Received:
    465
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Statesville N.C.
    Those jugs are real as hell, they jiggle and sag like the realest of boobs... Trust me, I have been starin' at her tits for years! She has the best jugs in Washington. :wink:
     
  11. Guy-jin

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    Messages:
    3,835
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    669
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    Pelosi hate is so unoriginal.

    Discussions about Pelosi's "big tits", though? That's "original" defined.
     
  12. HazelGod

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    7,531
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Other Side of the Pillow

    Good thing there's no tilt or brainwashing in any of that...just another sterling display of truth and common sense from our savior. :rolleyes:
     
  13. D_Ireonsyd_Colonrinse

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,539
    Likes Received:
    1
    Earmarks under a democratically-controlled Congress REDUCED!

    (read carefully, star. This Bud's for you.)

    From Politico.com, a non-partisan, respected source.


    The inconvenient truth about earmarks


    Republicans are planning another yearlong campaign to shame Democrats for failing to kill the practice of earmarking money for pet projects. But there are two big problems with the strategy, according to nonpartisan experts who track spending. Democrats last year actually approved fewer earmarks than Republican did when they ran Congress. And many Republicans remain very supportive of the controversial spending practice. The numbers speak for themselves.

    Congress did pass more than 11,000 earmarks last year at a cost north of $15 billion, according to data compiled by Taxpayers for Common Sense, a budget watchdog group. Roughly 40 percent of that money was set aside for projects requested by Republicans, essentially the same amount that has gone to the minority party in most years. Democrats claim the total number of earmarks is down 44 percent when compared with the Republican-controlled Congress in 2006. That number is misleading, however, because it does not represent what was actually signed into law. The actual reduction is much closer to 25 percent, says Steve Ellis of TCS.

    There is no doubt Democrats fell short of their campaign promise to end the practice, but they can rightly claim some progress.

    --------------------

    Star, you should be cheering the fact that the dems reduced earmarks by 25%!!

    Also, republicans are in the minority (and receiving 40% earmark pork money), but their earmark requests (per person) were more costly than their liberal counterparts!

    SHAME, STARMAN! For glossing over this inconvenient fact!


    The inconvenient truth about earmarks - Samuel Loewenberg - Politico.com
     
  14. B_VinylBoy

    B_VinylBoy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Messages:
    10,516
    Likes Received:
    7
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Boston, MA / New York, NY
    I would like to point out that the term "earmark" is just as played out as "tax cuts" and "pork barrel spending". Republicans need to learn some other language instead of trying to get cheap reactions on overdone buzzwords.
     
  15. houtx48

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes Received:
    35
    Gender:
    Male
    all pubbies really ever had was buzz words.........still not impressed by nancy and harry
     
  16. las000005

    las000005 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    no comment
    I think nancy baby would be good in bed and a real moaner.
     
  17. las000005

    las000005 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    no comment
    You guys need to lighten up and not be so serious
     
  18. ZOS23xy

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Messages:
    5,073
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    directly above the center of the earth
    Are you blind or do you not have good vision or what? After a certain point, some fantasies are so weird as to be eligible for consideration. Like those who wanted Sarah Palin...eeeewww!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted