Pelosi Helps Obama Get His Goove Back

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
. . . so just admit it, you came in to the thread spoiling for a fight with me, knew it exactly, ignored all else, and came right after me for no reason.

you addressed *none* of the other "actual audience" who critiqued it poorly prior to your entrance, & did not discuss the actual film with a *SINGLE* other poster other than 1 post towards me, after you started the attack. Or do you deny that?

you know that repetitious behavior of that nature constitutes harassment? Against the TOS, buddy. watch yourself.

. . . .until *YOU* waltzed in.

. . . . again, that is, until *YOU* waltzed in

(cont)
(cont) . . . .

talk about childish and petty. you walked into this thread just to start a fight with someone you think to be as insignificant as I

says more about you, stalker. I expect i'll see you do it again veeeery soon, since you are the obsessed one.

just remember, the next time you do it, it is harassment. :biggrin1:

"Harassment is behaviour which is intended to trouble or annoy someone, for example repeated attacks on them or attempts to cause them problems."

sleep on that.

night night tough guy.
For my response, please click Here .

Anybody want to 'waltz' now?
 
Last edited:

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
with an approval rating of 11%, she has problems and is too dumb to know it.
the same with harry reid, his approval rating is 7%
Way to select out data. No surprise, it's what the media do. The majority of respondents in the CBS poll I assume you're referring to (since you didn't provide any reference) either don't know who they are, or don't have an opinion. The total of unfavorable ratings are 37% for Pelosi and 23% for Reid respectively. Considering what they've just been through, I'd say that's pretty decent.

Poll: Favorability Ratings For Pelosi, Reid - CBS

I'd also venture to guess a much higher percentage of Faux News viewers know the names of these politicians vs. the rest of your average Americans - the ones who don't get to hear them demonized on a daily, almost hourly basis. That could kinda skew the percentages right there. Somebody really should test for the sheep factor in some of these polls.
 
Last edited:

Northland

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Posts
5,924
Media
0
Likes
39
Points
123
Sexuality
No Response
For my response, please click Here .

Anybody want to 'waltz' now?

Max; why in the hell are you taking such a juvenile approach as giving posts from an entirely different topic, and on an entirely different section of the board? Are you so much of a baby in mentality that you need to play nursery school games when Flashy placed a direct question to you?

Max, you have been asked for a clarification of an earlier statement; within this thread, of something which you said. What are you so afraid of, that you instead of answering, insist on directing people out of this thread? Your behavior is quite like that of the classmate of my 6 year old grand-nephew; who upon failng to do his homework, directs the teacher's attention to a truck passing by in the road outside, or a torn window shade.

You Max are like the 6 year old, and with no way to explain what you have written, you are sending us to another thread (which are like the truck and window shade in my analogy).

A)You make a statement

B)You are asked for a clarification

C)You place quotes from another thread here, quotes which have not one iota of relationship to this thread


Quite embryonic, even for you max, hopefully soon to become infantile.



Now, returning to topic- Pelosi/Obama/Dems they still have a hard road ahead. The November midterm elections will be a truer indicator of where people are in their thinking and support or lack of support towards The President. Based on those results, President Obama will better know how he stands and how much work will need to be done in his second two years.
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Max; why in the hell are you taking such a juvenile approach as giving posts from an entirely different topic, and on an entirely different section of the board?
Because children, flashie has absurdly accused me of entering a thread "spoiling for a fight" solely to "harrass" him. Obviously and ironically , that is exactly what he is doing here. I think it is entirely appropriate, smart in fact, to simply hold up a mirror in this instance - to point out the obvious irony in his accusation and direct him to my response. I'd much rather do that than go to the trouble of repeating myself and further disrupting this thread.

It's obvious that's what you are doing as well. I could hold the mirror up to you too if you like. Again.

I do hope that you appreciate me giving you a direct answer and "clarification". May I also point out that to my knowledge a poster is under no obligation to respond directly, indirectly, or even at all to another poster. For myself, I am generally less inclined to do so when said poster's motives are clearly disingenuous and badgering.

Flashie and Northie . . . truly in a class by themselves. A marriage made in heaven.
So. Working together again. Nice. Where are you registered? I'll try to get you something appropriate.
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Now, returning to topic- Pelosi/Obama/Dems they still have a hard road ahead. The November midterm elections will be a truer indicator of where people are in their thinking and support or lack of support towards The President. Based on those results, President Obama will better know how he stands and how much work will need to be done in his second two years.
wow. what profound political insight.

oh wait, I get it. just covering your tracks. okay, moving on.
 

Flashy

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Posts
7,901
Media
0
Likes
27
Points
183
Location
at home
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Because children, flashie has absurdly accused me of entering a thread "spoiling for a fight" solely to "harrass" him. Obviously and ironically , that is exactly what he is doing here. I think it is entirely appropriate, smart in fact, to simply hold up a mirror in this instance - to point out the obvious irony in his accusation and direct him to my response. I'd much rather do that than go to the trouble of repeating myself and further disrupting this thread.

how can a thread be disrupted when it asks for a clarification about the political point you made on the thread topic you spoke of in a post? Based on your one 5 posts ago, I'd say you know the M.O. pretty well.

Asking a question *ON TOPIC* is not verboten.

I would still like a clarification of the post you made, about the supermajority with regards to the coming election.

when you clarify your response, i will bow out of this thread, satisfied with an answer.

So. Working together again. Nice. Where are you registered? I'll try to get you something appropriate.

just make sure it is from the naked, desert faring, boot wearin' rattlesnake fighter collection at JC Penney.
 

Northland

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Posts
5,924
Media
0
Likes
39
Points
123
Sexuality
No Response
Max; why in the hell are you taking such a juvenile approach as giving posts from an entirely different topic, and on an entirely different section of the board? Are you so much of a baby in mentality that you need to play nursery school games when Flashy placed a direct question to you?

Max, you have been asked for a clarification of an earlier statement; within this thread, of something which you said. What are you so afraid of, that you instead of answering, insist on directing people out of this thread? Your behavior is quite like that of the classmate of my 6 year old grand-nephew; who upon failng to do his homework, directs the teacher's attention to a truck passing by in the road outside, or a torn window shade.

You Max are like the 6 year old, and with no way to explain what you have written, you are sending us to another thread (which are like the truck and window shade in my analogy).

A)You make a statement

B)You are asked for a clarification

C)You place quotes from another thread here, quotes which have not one iota of relationship to this thread


Quite embryonic, even for you max, hopefully soon to become infantile.




Because children, flashie has absurdly accused me of entering a thread "spoiling for a fight" solely to "harrass" him. Obviously and ironically , that is exactly what he is doing here. I think it is entirely appropriate, smart in fact, to simply hold up a mirror in this instance - to point out the obvious irony in his accusation and direct him to my response. I'd much rather do that than go to the trouble of repeating myself and further disrupting this thread.

It's obvious that's what you are doing as well. I could hold the mirror up to you too if you like. Again.

I do hope that you appreciate me giving you a direct answer and "clarification". May I also point out that to my knowledge a poster is under no obligation to respond directly, indirectly, or even at all to another poster. For myself, I am generally less inclined to do so when said poster's motives are clearly disingenuous and badgering
Is that how you see it maxie? I see a poster asking a question, asking for clarification. It's not an attack.

I then look at the thread you had us redirected to and find your first forray into that thread, post #53 and your first words: "OH .......MY ........GAWD! ..........is there no end to this dissertation"

This most clearly an attack. You aren't even making an attempt at addressing the topic there. You are not at that time responding to anything which anyone has posted there. It is entry into a thread to make an attack, much like one of your playground compadres or you perhaps might do when coming in and seeing someone else riding a shiny new trike around and interacting with others in a healthy manner, and in a jealous snit, you throw a tantrum.



maxcok said:
So. Working together again. Nice. Where are you registered? I'll try to get you something appropriate
Sorry, max. Flashy and others are their own person and have their own ideas. At times we may be on the same page, if that offends, then, well, it's your problem. Sucking your thumb and stomping your feet like a bratty two year old won't change that. There are thousands who post here maxie, at times we may have similar views.

**Over here maxie, stop staring at your mobile with little birdies and pretty flowers, that's for later when you get in cribby for nappy. We even washed Mr.Blanky with a nice smelling fabric softener.**

It's additionally perplexing, that you keep dragging up your past posts and requoting them, especially when they are from another thread and again, if we click on it we end up in another thread- yet another ruse which you carry as an attempt to get us out of this thread, where you have again failed your ABCs.

I'm feeling generous today, maxie, so I'm going to go get some pretty red and silver stars for you to put on your etch-a-sketch box to adorn it.


Try not to have a tantrum maxie or we will need to put you in your bassinet for a nappy--poo. Oh, gawd! That's it! You've gone poo-poo in your nappies. Maybe your mommy can get you changed before your cartoons come on.:smile:

Northland said:
Now, returning to topic- Pelosi/Obama/Dems they still have a hard road ahead. The November midterm elections will be a truer indicator of where people are in their thinking and support or lack of support towards The President. Based on those results, President Obama will better know how he stands and how much work will need to be done in his second two years.




wow. what profound political insight.

oh wait, I get it. just covering your tracks. okay, moving on
No need to get pouty max. I never claimed profound insight, I merely made a statement as to how I see the current political climate and the work which Ms.Pelosi and Mr.Obama must do. My thoughts on the matter, not a pretense of having great depth of thought towards the subject.

And no, it wasn't covering tracks, it was making a comment, in acknowlegement of the OPs topic. I had responded to your post; but, felt it would be in poor form not to also address the actual topic of this thread upon my entry into the thread.


Why are you so afraid of truth maxie? Did your mommy not give you a wet-ones wipe over this morning? Crawl along now...and do have a pleasant day.:smile::smile::smile:
 

Northland

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Posts
5,924
Media
0
Likes
39
Points
123
Sexuality
No Response
I would still like a clarification of the post you made, about the supermajority with regards to the coming election.

when you clarify your response, i will bow out of this thread, satisfied with an answer.



just make sure it is from the naked, desert faring, boot wearin' rattlesnake fighter collection at JC Penney.

I suspect you'll be waiting a long time for little maxie to properly respond. Then again, maybe he's been teleported to another dimension where lesbians promenade across the floor, do-si-do and dance some more. Yeah, promenade across the floor, sashay right out through the door.:biggrin1:


(I am still trying to figure out where that lesbian college which maxie mentioned is located:confused:)











(I hope I haven't offended max or anyone by responding to one of Flashy's posts)