Pelosi uses Ted Kennedy's death to promote agenda

[B_starinvestor]

It took you 18 hours to come up with that? It's the same rhetoric you've been spewing since you arrived here. Come up with somehting new for once.

Regarding Senator Kennedy, he made mistakes along the way, as most humans have.

Eh, 'mistakes?' He committed murder. That's hardly a 'mistake.'

He had to deal with them,

How's that?

and the fact that he kept focussed on helping not only his local constituents during his trying times and after; but also the nation as a whole, speaks to how fine and great a man he was and why Pelosi should be commended in reminding us of him when speaking on healthcare.

Unbelievable.

 

[ZOS23xy]

Really? Governors can now shape federal legislation?

That would be a neat trick.

It has been the case where several states can deal with a federal issue in such a fashion that goes against federal policy. Women Rights. Gay Marriage is one, Medical marijuana is another. If enough states can pass legislation for an issue to be consider worth dealing with in congress, a vote could be made concerning the issue. ERA was one such issue.

Your snap judgment style is lame.

 

[ZOS23xy]

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaahaaa haaa

Brown wins that bastard fuck's seat... Teddy must be flipping in his coffin like a drowned Mary Jo.

Scott Brown = used toilet paper?

 

[Onslow]

Eh, 'mistakes?' He committed murder. That's hardly a 'mistake.'



How's that?

We have no solid proof he committed murder. Murder as such would have involved some level of intent, it may have been a drunken blackout~~we can never fully know since he didn't discuss it with us.

How did he have to deal with it? He had to at some point acknowledge what had happened and he then had to find a way to push forward with hiis life in a meaningful way, which he did.

Unbelievable.

Yes, you are~~and that is not a compliment.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

Yes.

I don't make a habit of stepping on somebody's grave. But I hated ___________________. (S)he was a horrible (wo)man. (S)he should have been doing life in prison, but instead poisoned the senate.

Greed. Power. Money. Filth. Crime.

That's not what I was getting at. FQ used "the dead" to invoke his beliefs. Just like Nancy Pelosi, just like Scott Brown, just like John McCain... where were your critiques towards him? Oh, I get it... you're a hypocrite. Thanks for playing!!

And considering that every politician is essentially the same thing in different variants, you can swap out the proper name in that rhetoric and it'll never lose its relevance with those who have a blinding, hateful conviction of a certain person. The problem is, you seriously hate everyone and everything with a liberal mindset while I don't hate everyone with a conservative mindset. But I do hate rabid stupidity and ignorance.

 

[midlifebear]

Dear Onslow: You can come through the front door and brush against my walls any day. :smile:

 

[Onslow]

Dear Onslow: You can come through the front door and brush against my walls any day. :smile:

But will I also be allowed to drink tea from your Royal Doulton with hand painted periwinkles?

 

[midlifebear]

You can even have your own tin of biscuits!

 

[B_starinvestor]

It has been the case where several states can deal with a federal issue in such a fashion that goes against federal policy. Women Rights. Gay Marriage is one, Medical marijuana is another. If enough states can pass legislation for an issue to be consider worth dealing with in congress, a vote could be made concerning the issue. ERA was one such issue.

Your snap judgment style is lame.

Zos you have a serious drug problem.

No one is that much of a dolt. The bolded sentence above is pathetic.

Really? If any group comes up with 'something worth dealing with a vote could be made'

A vote could be made? You mean a governor could draft a bill and Congress will vote on it at the federal level?

Excuse me while I roll around laughing.

 

[B_starinvestor]

Tha The problem is, you seriously hate everyone and everything with a liberal mindset .

Nope. Just murderers and criminals.

But I do hate rabid stupidity and ignorance.

It must suck - hating yourself.

hang in there, buddy. You ARE valid. You ARE important. You DO matter, and some people like you.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

Nope. Just murderers and criminals.

Which Nancy Pelosi is not, but that doesn't stop you from spewing your hate either.

It must suck - hating yourself.

Speaking from experience?

hang in there, buddy. You ARE valid. You ARE important. You DO matter, and some people like you.

Tell me, do you see a black man when you look in your mirror every morning? Perhaps you should heed to your own advice, instead of projecting your insecurities on your opponents?

 

[B_starinvestor]

Which Nancy Pelosi is not, but that doesn't stop you from spewing your hate either.

I think Pelosi is a criminal.

I stipulate that there are idiots and criminals in the republican party as well. But this serving of democrats in the White House, House and Senate is vile. Reid, Pelosi, Frank, Obama, Edwards (at One America), Boxer, Feinstein, the late Ted Kennedy - these people are criminals and should be imprisoned.

If I lie to a client I could lose my job and potentially lose my securities license forever. Yet Obama/Pelosi can lie to hundreds of millions of people daily and there are no formal repercussions.

As I have pointed out before - multiple times - Obama is the biggest liar in American history, and possibly world history. I have been looking for a way to document this fact, although statistics on lying are not readily available.

I will try to formalize a system of tracking lies, and it will be utterly devastating to the liberal community when it sees the vastness and scope of Barack Obamas lies.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

I think Pelosi is a criminal.

Yeah, we all know how you think. It isn't impressing anyone.

I stipulate that there are idiots and criminals in the republican party as well. But this serving of democrats in the White House, House and Senate is vile.

What a way to inadvertently excuse one side for essentially the same thing.

Reid, Pelosi, Frank, Obama, Edwards (at One America), Boxer, Feinstein, the late Ted Kennedy - these people are criminals and should be imprisoned.

Yep... more of that critical "thinking" again, right?

If I lie to a client I could lose my job and potentially lose my securities license forever.

Oh, stop the bullshit here.
You're never going to convince me that you never told a lie or a half truth to a client. You do it perpetually on this board.

Yet Obama/Pelosi can lie to hundreds of millions of people daily and there are no formal repercussions.

When you start threads that hold ALL politicians accountable for their lies, then we can talk.

As I have pointed out before - multiple times - Obama is the biggest liar in American history, and possibly world history. I have been looking for a way to document this fact, although statistics on lying are not readily available.

Stop lying.

I will try to formalize a system of tracking lies, and it will be utterly devastating to the liberal community when it sees the vastness and scope of Barack Obamas lies.

One has already been established, and it has no problem calling people out on both sides of the political fence. It even gets into details, letting people know if something was barely true, half true or just complete tripe. Are you that desperate to find validity to your beliefs? Having problems coming to grips that your judgements on certain individuals, based on your own bigoted ideologies, may be off the mark? No wonder you make so many negative threads on this board. Instead of trying to convince everyone that you're right all the time, why not understand that sometimes you could actually be mistaken?

 

[ZOS23xy]

Zos you have a serious drug problem.

No one is that much of a dolt. The bolded sentence above is pathetic.

Really? If any group comes up with 'something worth dealing with a vote could be made'

A vote could be made? You mean a governor could draft a bill and Congress will vote on it at the federal level?

Excuse me while I roll around laughing.

Skipping your bad assumptions and name calling, I'll deal with the other idea.

Then how did ERA get passage?

It is a step by step procedure. Or in this case, a state by state procedure. For many years the ERA was being by passed in Washington, but individual states would consider passage of it. Then when it seemed that a collective of states backed it passed it, it was considered by Washington again.

Prior to Prohibition, there were several states that were "dry" (Oklahoma being one of them), and the issue was thrust into Congress/Senate. It was a foolish idea, but it passed.

You try to hard to make yourself the "know it all". I'm sorry to have flubbed the syntax in that "bold" sentence.

This sort of legislation--by a state by state basis will probably be where the "Gay Marriage" legality will finally come from.

Don't roll in your own ignorance. It's not becoming.

 

[Industrialsize]

Skipping your bad assumptions and name calling, I'll deal with the other idea.

Then how did ERA get passage?

It is a step by step procedure. Or in this case, a state by state procedure. For many years the ERA was being by passed in Washington, but individual states would consider passage of it. Then when it seemed that a collective of states backed it passed it, it was considered by Washington again.

Prior to Prohibition, there were several states that were "dry" (Oklahoma being one of them), and the issue was thrust into Congress/Senate. It was a foolish idea, but it passed.

You try to hard to make yourself the "know it all". I'm sorry to have flubbed the syntax in that "bold" sentence.

This sort of legislation--by a state by state basis will probably be where the "Gay Marriage" legality will finally come from.

Don't roll in your own ignorance. It's not becoming.

Unfortunately the ERA did not get ratified. The states on both coasts and the upper midwest ratified it. The Southeast from Virginia to Florida to Louisiana and up to indiana did NOT ratify it so it was never enacted.

 

[ZOS23xy]

Hmm. So I'm wrong. It could still be made an issue, and enacted? How many states enacted it?


I checked on Wiki, and only 15 states have not totally ratified it. Its been introduced since 1923.

Odd for it to fall by the way side, since it seems so close.

 

[midlifebear]

Question: How can you tell if the Starpooper is lying?
Answer: His mouth is open.

 

[maxcok]

Question: How can you tell if the Starpooper is lying?
Answer: His mouth is open.

You know how I hate to contradict you, my dear El Bear, but you are mistaken. The drivel that issues from Starpooper comes out that hole at the other end. I thought you knew that.

 

[ZOS23xy]

Question: How can you tell if the Starpooper is lying?
Answer: His mouth is open.

no, wrong: he types without thinking.