penile aspect ratio

[Bernd]

Hello!
Sorry for my poor English. It's not easy to explain difficult things in a foreigh language!

I read something interesting in a science homepage!
There are men with weak erections only because of the bad ratio between penile length and penile circumference. So there are penises that are really too thin to get really hard.
The borderline ratio is 1.31
For example my cock is 6.9 inches long and has a circumference of 5.7 inches.
6.9 : 5.7 = 1.21 (good ratio)

A cock of 8 inches and 5.5 inches circumference:

8 : 5.5 = 1.45 (bad ratio)

What do you think of this "penile aspect ratio"

Is it true that long thin penises have erectile problems?

 

[Nerogold]

The aspect ratio of an image is its displayed width divided by its height (usually expressed as "x:y" or "xÅ~y," with the joining colon or multiplication symbol articulated as the preposition "by" or sometimes "to"). For instance, the aspect ratio of a traditional television screen is 4:3, or 1.33:1.

High-definition television and European digital television use an aspect of 16:9, or about 1.78:1. Aspect ratios of 2.39:1[1] or 1.85:1 are frequently used in cinematography, while the aspect ratio of a sync-sound 35 mm film frame is 1.37:1 (also known as "Academy Aperture" ratio). Silent films, which used the full frame, were shot in 1.33:1.

Useless answer, but educational ;.)

 

[Bernd]

Diameter Length ratio

I found an interesting link:
http://www.nature.com/ijir/journal/v10/n1/pdf/3900311a.pdf

 

[ostrich egg]

how dose one find their ratio?

 

[B_andyo]

well i got 1.17 lol

 

[B_big dirigible]

The borderline ratio is 1.31

Is it true that long thin penises have erectile problems?

I've never heard of this particular theory.

Speaking as a 1.38 type of guy, I'd say it's hooey.

 

[Reticent horse]

This makes no sense. A long fat cock would need more blood to fill so would be harder to get bone hard than a long thin cock.

 

[sweetnhot]

I dated a guy with a really thin long dick and he was hard in an instant. I've also dated a huge, thick guy, and it was the same (I'd always heard big guys took longer, but that was hooey!). I think there's no correlation.

 

[Love-it]

1.04 and rock hard, but I am short in the length department at 6.5".

 

[Mr._dB]

1.50 and no problems here.

 

[apropos]

Also 1.5 with no problems.

 

[ostrich egg]

hehe, my raio is 1

 

[mightythickcock]

1.14 here and get rock hard

 

[B_big dirigible]

I have a suspicion that anyone who talks about being "rock hard" doesn't know a whole lot about rocks.

 

[mightythickcock]

No, I guess all those geology classes I took at the School of Mines never sunk in... you know Talc is a rock ...

Oh - and Bernd, your English is far better than my German!

 

[fak_et]

1.16, no problems here, get hard fast and rock solid.

 

[Bernd]

Thank you!

 

[B_josiah852]

One of the major causes of erectile problems is plaque in the arteries. Yes that's right. Cholesterol. One of the first things you should check if you are having problems filling the penis with blood is your cholesterol. If you have high cholesterol you should change your diet and exercise. Try to stay away from cholesterol lowering drugs as the side effects can be horrific. Been there, done that.

 

[vince]

Good advice josiah852. thx

1.14 no problems

 

[basque9]

At 9.25 x 7.50. My ratio is 1.233. I have occasional erectile problems...but then at my age most men experience severe degradation without use of drugs such as Viagra. The amount of blood a cock the size of mine requires to become rock hard is more than twice that required for an average 6 x 5 cock! I think a lot more physics gets involved in erecting a cock and then elevating it than just this ratio being discussed!