Penis fiction or penis fact?

Discussion in 'Sex With a Large Penis' started by freddy1776, Jul 15, 2011.

  1. freddy1776

    freddy1776 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Survey says:

    9 x 6.5 XX-Large
    8 x 6 X-Large
    7 x 5.5 Large
    6 x 5 Medium
    5 x 4.5 Small
    4 x 4 X-small

    *********************************

    from: http://dfred.bol.ucla.edu/LeverFrederickPeplau-2006PMM-PenisSizeSatisfaction.pdf

    1) the mean erect penis length was 5.3 in. (13.5 cm)

    2) with 68% of men measuring between 4.6 and 6.0 in. (11.7 cm and 15.2 cm)

    3) 13.5% between 6.1 and 6.8 in. (15.5 cm and 17.3 cm)

    4) only about 2.5% of men possessed a penis over 6.9 in. (17.5 cm) long


    In other words if your penis was 6.9 inches and you were in a room of 100 randomly chosen men only 2 and a half penises (okay, okay 3) would be larger than yours.

    The link is the most authoritative paper I can find and makes the most sense.
     
  2. Pecker

    Pecker Retired Moderator
    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2002
    Messages:
    83,922
    Likes Received:
    34
    The room may have been cold.
     
  3. sykray

    sykray Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    104
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Chon Buri (TH)
    This paper certainly reflects the evidence from standardised penis measuring research that I used professionally and also my own professional experience and opinion on how men relate to their penis size.
     
  4. BigInBellevue

    Verified Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    545
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    57
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Nashville (TN, US)
    Verified:
    Photo
    I'd like an opinion on the validity of a measurement method which I used when younger. Rather than place a ruler against the pubic bone, I laid my penis out on a counter and measured from the edge of the counter to the tip. This seemed like a legitimate method, since it would be the depth to which it could penetrate. If you have compared this method with the ruler atop the penis, could you see any perceptible difference in measurements? When I called it 8.5 inches (21.5 cm) was I exaggerating my size?
     
  5. B_625girth

    B_625girth New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    midwest
    sounds about right. I'm 7.25 x 6.5. a few yrs back, a website had some statistics, and about 4 men out of 100 would be my size or larger.
     
  6. TomCat84

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    3,497
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    32
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    If we went by what most people say, 7 would be the median.:rolleyes:
     
  7. AlphaMale

    Verified Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    3,106
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    3,843
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
    Verified:
    Photo
    Yeah I'd say those numbers are pretty much dead on. However, I'd like to point out that if someone was truely 9" long then they probably wouldn't also be 6.5" thick at the same time. 9x6 or 9x5 would probably be more realistic.

    Most longer penises are thinner, and most thicker penises are shorter. And I don't mean thin/short as in small for those categories. I just mean that you don't see both super long and super thick at the same time very often. It's usually one or the other.
     
    #7 AlphaMale, Jul 16, 2011
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2011
Draft saved Draft deleted