D_Cateryke Cheesysmell
Experimental Member
Clearly the answer is that all towel dancers all have genital warts/micropenis and are horribly embarassed.
Seriously though, I think the trend could be a result of the general sexualization of men...nobody used to think of dudes in the locker room in sexual terms. That's changed...partly with gay guys being more out, part has to do with the more general image of modern men. In extremely general terms, good looking men used to look debonair, suave and sophisticated. They did not have to be pretty. Now they have to pout like 16 year old girls and act all sexy-like, preferably to a heavy base beat.
Nothing necessarily wrong with either way, but both convey different messages; one of secure, less constantly sexual beings, and one less secure, and more intensely and frequently sexual. And as a result there exists the nagging thought in the back of the straight teen/twentysomething mind... "The archetype I see all the time is hyper-sexual, but wait, is that guy checking me out? Crap. Now what do I do?"
Or in a different mindset, "Social cues are telling me this situation is very sexual because there's so much nudity. Naked = sex, right? I see it that way every day. Sometimes there is sex without nudity, but never do I see nudity without sex. But it's all dudes here....must not get boner, must not get boner....."
As a result of that conflict we have increased homoeroticism in locker type situations among younger guys.... what used to be just "horseplay" (god, what a fuddy-duddy word....and so is fuddy-duddy) now has the potential for an uncomfortable sexual dimension...so you start to see phenomena like towel dancing (defense) or the "no homo" game (offense) cropping up just to try and diffuse the damn tension. That is why when someone actually points out that it's no big deal to just take a shower, people generally agree and get on with it, but if nobody does, the automatic defenses click on.
The ultimate result is that unless any action, including taking off your own pants in a bloody locker room, is predicated by some kind of homosexual behavior waiver, your terribly fragile masculinity will be damaged and everyone will automatically assume you are the biggest queen since perez hilton. (or at least that's what you think they'll do)
The unintended consequence is that guys, in an effort to prove their hyper-masculinity beyond question, engage in behavior that, to an outside observer....looks damned gay. (I'm so straight I can wear 4 neon pink polos, let my buddy shave my gooch, and get a pedicure every thursday.)
Whatever dude....
Is it insecurity? Is it confusion? Is it the simple desire for privacy? All of the above and probably more.
The trend is that men are being sexualized in a way they never have before... and the response of the younger generation is to act in a way they never have before lest they betray some outward sign of that sexualization in what to them seems like a deadly social faux pas.
It it still stupid? You bet.
Seriously though, I think the trend could be a result of the general sexualization of men...nobody used to think of dudes in the locker room in sexual terms. That's changed...partly with gay guys being more out, part has to do with the more general image of modern men. In extremely general terms, good looking men used to look debonair, suave and sophisticated. They did not have to be pretty. Now they have to pout like 16 year old girls and act all sexy-like, preferably to a heavy base beat.
Nothing necessarily wrong with either way, but both convey different messages; one of secure, less constantly sexual beings, and one less secure, and more intensely and frequently sexual. And as a result there exists the nagging thought in the back of the straight teen/twentysomething mind... "The archetype I see all the time is hyper-sexual, but wait, is that guy checking me out? Crap. Now what do I do?"
Or in a different mindset, "Social cues are telling me this situation is very sexual because there's so much nudity. Naked = sex, right? I see it that way every day. Sometimes there is sex without nudity, but never do I see nudity without sex. But it's all dudes here....must not get boner, must not get boner....."
As a result of that conflict we have increased homoeroticism in locker type situations among younger guys.... what used to be just "horseplay" (god, what a fuddy-duddy word....and so is fuddy-duddy) now has the potential for an uncomfortable sexual dimension...so you start to see phenomena like towel dancing (defense) or the "no homo" game (offense) cropping up just to try and diffuse the damn tension. That is why when someone actually points out that it's no big deal to just take a shower, people generally agree and get on with it, but if nobody does, the automatic defenses click on.
The ultimate result is that unless any action, including taking off your own pants in a bloody locker room, is predicated by some kind of homosexual behavior waiver, your terribly fragile masculinity will be damaged and everyone will automatically assume you are the biggest queen since perez hilton. (or at least that's what you think they'll do)
The unintended consequence is that guys, in an effort to prove their hyper-masculinity beyond question, engage in behavior that, to an outside observer....looks damned gay. (I'm so straight I can wear 4 neon pink polos, let my buddy shave my gooch, and get a pedicure every thursday.)
Whatever dude....
Is it insecurity? Is it confusion? Is it the simple desire for privacy? All of the above and probably more.
The trend is that men are being sexualized in a way they never have before... and the response of the younger generation is to act in a way they never have before lest they betray some outward sign of that sexualization in what to them seems like a deadly social faux pas.
It it still stupid? You bet.
Last edited: