Percentage of female size queens by race?

[B_superlarge]

You're overplaying the vicim card SL, though you do it quite well I must admit. A quick glance at your thread history shows quite clearly that you have some weird obsession with race and size and now you are focusing on the vagina size of African women, presumably to try to support some evolutionary theory about African guys having big schlongs.

You keep saying that you quote Doctors, like some naff false advertising, yet you have been called on it before and you never quoted any genuine research. Your previous posts on racial vagina size were completely wrong and unsupported.

There are plenty of guys with cocks here who have been with women of different ethnic backgrounds, why don't you just ask our opinion? I have offered my experience, completely genuine, yet you ignore it. Why? Doesn't it fit your agenda as well as the Director's instructions in porn?

In response to you I typed out a long detailed response about doctor studies I've posted before (several concerning Asian, and also concerning 7 doctor studies that included flaccid to erect sizes in their studies (which indicates a strong correlation between flaccid and erect size despite the popular opinion that "growers" catch up with "showers") and how that logically pertains to black men if they indeed have longer flaccids, which all one has to do is watch track and field meets to clearly see there is in general a flaccid difference between the white guys on the track and the black guys on the track, but then I couldn't post it or copy it, and lost it. I typed out another long post and the same thing happened. So damn it, lol. I'm not the best typist in the world so it ate up far too much time. Hopefully this quick response will be posted. There is a lot about my postings you just don't seem to realise. I'm not going to post everything, including doctor studies, all over again. I've never claimed there were doctor studies specifically on black men. Many have posted that such studies exist, and I've tried to correct some of them, no matter which side of fence they were posting their incorrect post from.
Just a week ago someone posted that studies indicate black men are bigger. I posted this response:
"There are not any studies on just black men. There are doctor studies on just Asian men, and there are doctor studies in which the participants were almost all white, but not specifically on black men."
See, if I had an agenda I wouldn't squash such postings. People don't ever challenge people if it supports their own opinion. That should show you I really am the objective person I say I am.

 

[Principessa]

New researches by the UoU (University of Uselesstatisticology) related to the ToW (Theory of Whocaresitivity) proof that:

- 75,03% of women who own a pet dog like bananas
- 47,32% of asian woman who visit Las Vegas at least once a year are left handed

From this we can deduce that if you are in Las Vegas and get a handjob from an asian woman that owns a pet dog and doesn't live in Vegas, almost half of the time she will do it with the left hand, and in this group of events, your cock will smell like bananas 3 out of 4 times.

The possibility that she can be wanking you and eating the banana at the same time is disregarded as it is a complex and dangerous activity, she may get confused and bite your cock while she shakes the banana.
If she is so skilled that she can control both hands without making mistakes, ask her to marry you at least 87,39% of the times.

You are welcome

:rofl: ROTFLMAO :flirt: I think I'm in love with you. :wink:

You're overplaying the vicim card SL, though you do it quite well I must admit. A quick glance at your thread history shows quite clearly that you have some weird obsession with race and size and now you are focusing on the vagina size of African women, presumably to try to support some evolutionary theory about African guys having big schlongs.

You keep saying that you quote Doctors, like some naff false advertising, yet you have been called on it before and you never quoted any genuine research. Your previous posts on racial vagina size were completely wrong and unsupported.

There are plenty of guys with cocks here who have been with women of different ethnic backgrounds, why don't you just ask our opinion? I have offered my experience, completely genuine, yet you ignore it. Why? Doesn't it fit your agenda as well as the Director's instructions in porn?

Why would he want your opinion? Your name isn't Dr. Drifterwood, you don't have a radio or tv show and to the best of my knowledge you have never been on BET in any capacity.

 

[B_superlarge]

okay, its not a "race" thing, although i have noticed all of my life, that black women are are more open about admitting it, its more of an "age" thing , as a woman gets older, say gets divorced, THEN she becomes a "size" queen, when she has an amazing lover who is BIG, why try to label it "race" why does everything have to have a label??? all black people aren't the same, all white people aren't the same, all asian people aren't the same, its how your raised, the enviorment you grew up in, people can't be labeled!!!!

That's your right lobe brain thinking. It's correct, but it's not the entire picture. Complete information can possibly be useful to some, no matter how useless the info is deemed to be by others. Exact knowledge is always a good thing. That everyone is different is true, that there are more important things in this world than penis size is true, but it's still not the entire picture. Most women are liberals. It's a label, and it might be deemed useless, but it tells me the odds are about 83% that you are a liberal and your post solidified the odds (though of course it's still not a sure bet) since liberals think in wholes. When someone knows the odds/chances that can help them make decisions at times, or at least have a better understanding.

 

[B_superlarge]

:rofl: ROTFLMAO :flirt: I think I'm in love with you. :wink:

So that "seduces your mind".

 

[Principessa]

So that "seduces your mind".

No, but it made me laugh, and a good sense of humor is high on my list.

 

[B_superlarge]

No, but it made me laugh, and a good sense of humor is high on my list.

Well, you produced the love word so quickly, but I suppose you were just joking also.:biggrin1:

 

[Drifterwood]

In a previous thread you stated that men varied by race, Asians 4.5, Whites 5.5 and Blacks 6.5, you also stated that women were when stretched 7.5, 8.5 and 9.5 respectively (it may have been an inch more). None of these "statistics" correspond to the surveys that I have seen, for men self reported and for women from proper medical journals.

For women there is an average stretched vaginal length of between 6 and 9, which is why you hear the general ideal penis length of 7 to 8, but I have never seen this broken down by race. Nor does any racial difference correspond to my own experiences. I have been with enough White and Asian women to say that they both adhere to the average variations with no perceivable leaning one way or the other by race. I have not been with enough African women to really come to any conclusions, but they were completely average. These are the averages, and as with cocks there are further variations at either end of the scale.

Another point that I would like to make to you is the illogical nature of your premise. A woman, irrespective of race, is no more a size queen if she has a stretched vaginal length of 9 for wanting a 9, than the woman who is 6 and wants a 6. They are the same, they want what fits for them. Yet we (well you) label the women who can and like to take more. Men clearly get upset when they are not built for some women, but only when the woman is bigger and not vice versa it seems.

 

[B_superlarge]

In a previous thread you stated that men varied by race, Asians 4.5, Whites 5.5 and Blacks 6.5, you also stated that women were when stretched 7.5, 8.5 and 9.5 respectively (it may have been an inch more). None of these "statistics" correspond to the surveys that I have seen, for men self reported and for women from proper medical journals.

For women there is an average stretched vaginal length of between 6 and 9, which is why you hear the general ideal penis length of 7 to 8, but I have never seen this broken down by race. Nor does any racial difference correspond to my own experiences. I have been with enough White and Asian women to say that they both adhere to the average variations with no perceivable leaning one way or the other by race. I have not been with enough African women to really come to any conclusions, but they were completely average. These are the averages, and as with cocks there are further variations at either end of the scale.

Another point that I would like to make to you is the illogical nature of your premise. A woman, irrespective of race, is no more a size queen if she has a stretched vaginal length of 9 for wanting a 9, than the woman who is 6 and wants a 6. They are the same, they want what fits for them. Yet we (well you) label the women who can and like to take more. Men clearly get upset when they are not built for some women, but only when the woman is bigger and not vice versa it seems.

I've don't think I've said that black women are size queens because they have bigger vaginas. Someone else said that in this thread. I must admit I've pondered the notion a bit, trying to figure if there could somehow be a reason that is related, but on the surface it does appear illogical and very well may be. I'm more drawn to thinking its maybe pyschological/cultural in nature. That's for another thread. I don't have time to address it now. I would much like to read some well thought out viewpoints on it.
As far as the measurements I presented go, they are well thought out. I drew up the chart based on direct doctor studies (such as the Asian ones), indirect doctor studies (such as the flaccid charts), and self study of several databases. How is it the Asian doctor studies clearly indicate a difference but you claim no difference in the women. You bring up logic (and it was a good point). Well, logically women of a race correspond size wise to the men of the same race. Since the Asian studies appear quite valid, then why is it you don't realise that makes sense?

 

[TinyPrincess]

You don't ever offer data to support your stances. I can offer up doctor studies on race vs penis size.

Well, I could start answering this... But I think Drifter did it so nicely...

You're overplaying the vicim card [...] A quick glance at your thread history shows quite clearly that you have some weird obsession with race and size.

You keep saying that you quote Doctors [...] yet you never quoted any genuine research. Doesn't it fit your agenda as well as the Director's instructions in porn?

I agree totally, Drifter.

TP, I would marry you 105% of the time even if you can't do the bananawank trick

Well, if I fail doing the bananawank, I'm quite sure you will teach me :tongue:

 

[_Alexxx_]

Well, if I fail doing the bananawank, I'm quite sure you will teach me :tongue:

I'd rather teach you how to give me tantric massages (and of course would start by giving you a good sample of them)

 

[TinyPrincess]

LOL - I actually could use some massage right now... My neck is killing me

 

[DC_DEEP]

Alright, this thread has gone on long enough.

The definitive answer is: 37.2%

 

[tiggerpoo]

LOL - I actually could use some massage right now... My neck is killing me

TinyPrincess

I'm an expert on massage (among other things). I'd fix your neck in a (slow but delightful) jiffy. :wink:

 

[_Alexxx_]

LOL - I actually could use some massage right now... My neck is killing me

In order to fix your neck I will need to know the race distribution in % of your coworkers and neighbours.

About you, don't worry, I will find out every bit of your race and skin colour while I do the massage :tongue:

 

[B_superlarge]

A quick glance at your thread history shows quite clearly that you have some weird obsession with race

That is incorrect. And of course TinyPrincess quotes it and says how wonderfully accurate that is. My posts mostly center around whether correlations exist or not, and that includes very many various factor topics that come up, what ever it happens to be. Now sure, if race happens to come up around here more often then it could be my mind is focused on that debated factor more often. But the bottom line is that my posts are about correlations or the lack of correlations. I've gone round and round with posters concerning many factors, since if a correlation was spotted in other factors vs penis size people become offended concerning those also, though not as offended as they do with race vs penis since race is a more sensitive subject due to the horrible mistreatment black people have had to endure in our history. If I post no correlation appears to exist in a factor vs penis size then everything is peaceful and quiet. Correlation seems to be an ugly word to the right lobe brain. A quick glance indeed. I'll admit I do have an obsession with the well endowed thick round butts many black women have. But that doesn't really have anything to do with race. It's about butts. And they just happen to have it most often, unless you're going to deny it. Kind of difficult to deny that one, yet I've actually seen posts dance around it trying to act like it's not all that so.

 

[TinyPrincess]

Alright, this thread has gone on long enough.

The definitive answer is: 37.2%

No, no, no - it's 37.3%

TinyPrincess

I'm an expert on massage (among other things). I'd fix your neck in a (slow but delightful) jiffy. :wink:

How come I'm not surprised :tongue:

My posts mostly center around whether correlations exist or not, and that includes very many various factor topics that come up, what ever it happens to be. Now sure, if race happens to come up around here more often then it could be my mind is focused on that debated factor more often.

OK, Superlarge. I admit it - your posts are mainly on correlations. It just bugs me whenever you start a new thread along the lines of girls with Mandingo based on race - and claim it to be science.

As you mention in your post, you're really into big black butts - why not test if there is a correlation between butt size and ability to handle Mandingo? Or height of the girls? Or age? Or experience? Or professional vs. amateur? There are so many other possible and just as likely factors at play that could correlate into something useful or less useful.

I know I probably helping hijack the thread, but you simply makes your posts to polarized not to make fun of.

 

[B_superlarge]

OK, Superlarge. I admit it - your posts are mainly on correlations. It just bugs me whenever you start a new thread along the lines of girls with Mandingo based on race - and claim it to be science.

As you mention in your post, you're really into big black butts - why not test if there is a correlation between butt size and ability to handle Mandingo? Or height of the girls? Or age? Or experience? Or professional vs. amateur? There are so many other possible and just as likely factors at play that could correlate into something useful or less useful.

I know I probably helping hijack the thread, but you simply makes your posts to polarized not to make fun of.

Thank you for admitting that. Few people ever admit anything contrary to what they've previously posted, so that means a lot to me.

To be accurate with the wording, I'm not into big black butts, I'm into big butts that most often just so happen to be black.

Concerning the other possible correlations you mentioned, I actually once started a thread asking if folks thought butt size correlated with how much penis women can take. It of course was rejected hands down as completely absurd. I don't remember much detail about the thread, whether it caused a lot of uproar or not. But is it? Do you know there has actually been a doctor study indicating natural butt size is correlated with penis size. Surprising such a study exists but yes that was compared. I've posted the study before. There has only been one such study though. I think it was harshly rejected as not having being peered reviewed and considered a ridiculous thought, study or not.

I'll go more into your post when I return. Out of time for now.

Ok, continuing on. Since, despite popular opinion, there is detailed study indicating there is an overall mild correlation between height and penis length, and a moderate correlation between outlier penis sizes and height, then I would think there is probably a similiar correlation between height and vagina depth. To test that in Mandingo videos may be possible, I'm not sure. A problem I see is that I've read before that tall women are not cast with Mandingo because he is a short fellow. I don't know how much that is true. I would need to know the height of each one that does a scene with him. That might be possible to find out. Also, I think mainly just professionals do scenes with him. There may not be enough amateur data to compare with. Not sure. As far as experience the professionals may have all had much experience. That may be difficult to accurately calculate. I'll think about it some more. Some of it may not be practically possible to test, perhaps. Still though, it won't matter as far as 'correlations don't exist' advocates go. It would be auto rejected as only porn videos that can't possibly indicate anything. People would still post their "ROFLMFAO" posts. So should I even continue to use up my time for such total rejection.

 

[B_superlarge]

Vagina size was brought up in this thread when one guy said vagina size is correlated with size queens and then another guy was in disagreement with him about his posting black women have bigger vaginas. I haven't made much headway concerning the purpose of this thread, but at least perhaps the air has been cleared somewhat as to what my posts are about. It helps that TinyPrincess is now agreeing that my posts revolve around the study of correlations or lack thereof. Hopefully that carries some weight to help others realise more clearly. Hopefully, but I doubt it.

 

[TinyPrincess]

Thank you for admitting that. Few people ever admit anything contrary to what they've previously posted, so that means a lot to me.

I admit to being sarcastic and nasty and very fast to hit the keys...

Concerning the other possible correlations you mentioned, I actually once started a thread asking if folks thought butt size correlated with how much penis women can take.

Since, despite popular opinion, there is detailed study indicating there is an overall mild correlation between height and penis length, and a moderate correlation between outlier penis sizes and height, then I would think there is probably a similiar correlation between height and vagina depth.

I'm not to tell whether there is any correlation on any of them - and I think it will be very hard to make it stick as e.g. my ability to take a large penis is mainly determined by my mind and not my size. I would imagine this is so for most if not all women.

t helps that TinyPrincess is now agreeing that my posts revolve around the study of correlations or lack thereof.

Again there might be correlations - I just don't see how they would ever be proved or even just made likely as there are so many factors involved - and how in the world will you show any correlation based of mind, knowledge and experience???

 

[Drifterwood]

Sorry DC.

OK SL, I think you started the thread with the assertion that 10% of white women are size queens and at least 30% of black women are size queens based on your observations. You then requoted your Mandingo "research".

I find inherent weaknesses and contradictions in your premise. You haven't addressed my questions to you on this.

1/ Is a woman who can take 9 more of a size queen that a woman who can take 6, where both have an equal desire for the size that fits?

2/ Are you asserting that black women have larger vaginas than white women based on your observation above?

3/ Please link to a single doctor survey that supports any of your theories on size and race.