I can't speak for BHR, SP, NJ, TK or anyone else who S&S seems to have had a run in with, I can only speak of them. They may disagree with my interpretation of events.
When S&S first came on the board I (and a few of the others on that list and not - bar SP, I think) tried conversing with her in our normal styles. She reacted quite caustically to most of us, even when our intentions were not to offend - nor aimed specifically at her - just us being us. NJ has made some very positive, supportive comments recently and still had her face slapped - mainly, it seems, because S&S hadn't read certain other things NJ had posted to her and S&S did apologise in that instance.
I think what has happened here is that S&S has put all of our noses out of joint by being generally flamey at us regardless of our intent. It isn't nice to be repeatedly misread. If it appears we are ganging up, well that's unfortunate - I see it as just normal group dynamics playing out. But then I have a thick skin.
Earlier in this thread I said I won't respond to any more of her posts and I really think that is best - S&S seems to read comments from a very skewed perspective, very often reading what is not there at all, and takes her own interpretation as the only possible meaning - kind of like Madame Zora but completely devoid of intellect. (Now you see that is me having an unprovoked pop at someone - see the difference?)