If someone gets off to that stuff, good on them. At least it's engaging us in conversation we want to talk about.
How precisely is anyone to know what we want to talk about without asking the question in the first place?
Come on now...Look at the threads in this section and tell me they are valuable. Are you contributing to most of them? If not, why?
Who determines what has value? I don't think this thread has much value but you who started it obviously do. The reason I don't participate in every thread is because I don't have enough time to answer every thread so I pick and choose what's important enough to spend time on or just leave brief comments on others. Just because I don't find a particular thread worth the time I have at any given moment doesn't mean I think it shouldn't have been posted. Those I'll report.
I haven't argued about gay vs hetero segregation because it's not my issue to take aim with. Gay and hetero men are still both male. Women have an entirely different set of issues to deal with (not to mention transgender women!)
So by this I take it your aim
is segregation between men and women in this forum. I can't see a reason to have written this otherwise.
What does a special place mean other than a place where women's issues are discussed? Is it meant to be a joke? Because that's the message that is being sent when the content doesn't match the title. Rename this section "Wank Fodder" at the very least if that's the case.
What does a special place for women on a site about large cock mean other than women's issues relating to large cocks?
Seemed self explanatory to me at least.
If you wanted threads purely by women, for women, about women I'm sure "Our Bodies, Ourselves" has a discussion group of some form.
The Real Ladies social group is only open to verified women. There are lots of women who chose for whatever reason not to be verified, that might want to contribute to discussion.
Jesus that's weak. You want to exclude men from discussion but not "women"(men).
The suggestion to ban men was totally tongue-in-cheek. This isn't about segregation, it's about renaming the section to correctly reflect the topics.
That's not really how what you've said reads. For example you don't reject the Real Women's group idea based on the fact that you still want some participation from men but on the basis that not all women verify.
It was a joke, Gillette. Tounge-in-cheek.
Unless there's some sort of indication of a different tone I read posts as honest statements. Given your other posts on the subject on men posting I didn't think you were joking.
It should read as I posted it, thank you.
Sense as determined by any of us who care about what is being posted. Every woman that has posted in this thread has that sense.
And not every woman who has posted in this thread has agreed with you. You're making the same mistake that I recently made in assuming that all women were running on the same standard. I said something about how it wasn't like a woman would post a pic of her vag just because a guy started a thread asking her to. And yet that very thing happened.
We spend so much time telling men that every woman is different that we forget to apply that same wisdom ourselves. Sense
is determined by any of us who care about what is being posted. And no one of us or even group of 20 can decide for all the others what is or isn't sense for them.
That's censorship.
If you don't care, then you don't have to get involved.
Precisely the advice you should be following yourself.
Segregation and censorship are issues I do care about and want to prevent, hence my participation in this thread.