Playgirl penis size survey

D_Cunningham Cumshipper

Just Browsing
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Posts
109
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
161
I've never heard of this survey before, but I found this online:
"The most authoritative data on cock size was recently published in the March 2003 issue of Playgirl. Only one in every 100 men has a penis that is eight inches or larger. More elusive is the thick one - six inches around or more make up approximately one out of every 1000 of the schlong-sporting guys."

I was just wondering if anybody had more data from this study to share as I have never seen it.
 

BIGBULL29

Worshipped Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
7,619
Media
52
Likes
14,293
Points
343
Location
State College (Pennsylvania, United States)
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
I've never heard of this survey before, but I found this online:
"The most authoritative data on cock size was recently published in the March 2003 issue of Playgirl. Only one in every 100 men has a penis that is eight inches or larger. More elusive is the thick one - six inches around or more make up approximately one out of every 1000 of the schlong-sporting guys."

I was just wondering if anybody had more data from this study to share as I have never seen it.


Perhaps I should be in Playgirl. I'd put all those playgirl boys to shame.:biggrin1:
 

D_Mansworthy Meatwrench III

Experimental Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2007
Posts
118
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
163
Great! Makes me happy at............8X6, that's for damn sure.

I never believe that shit, surveys tend to be done in a very minor population cut, and applied to a large population, only to find out that indeed, not everyone eats Reese's Cups as previously believed by the last survey..........
 

BIGBULL29

Worshipped Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
7,619
Media
52
Likes
14,293
Points
343
Location
State College (Pennsylvania, United States)
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
Great! Makes me happy at............8X6, that's for damn sure.

I never believe that shit, surveys tend to be done in a very minor population cut, and applied to a large population, only to find out that indeed, not everyone eats Reese's Cups as previously believed by the last survey..........

The vast majority of men, including male porn stars, greatly exaggerate the size of their peters. We all should know that by now.

Real Length Conversion Chart (relatively accurate:tongue:)

8 inches length = 6 inches length
9 inches length = 7 inches length
10 inches length = 8 inches length (quite uncommon)

Girth figures are rarely given because so few dudes have big girth (anything over 6.5 inches)

Big length is still a lot more common than big girth

Any girth truly over 7 inches is a rare commodity.
 

vpasqual

1st Like
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Posts
148
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
161
Location
NY METRO AREA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
The vast majority of men, including male porn stars, greatly exaggerate the size of their peters. We all should know that by now.

Real Length Conversion Chart (relatively accurate:tongue:)

8 inches length = 6 inches length
9 inches length = 7 inches length
10 inches length = 8 inches length (quite uncommon)

Girth figures are rarely given because so few dudes have big girth (anything over 6.5 inches)

Big length is still a lot more common than big girth

Any girth truly over 7 inches is a rare commodity.
Not me! I am an exact 8X6 and can provide more picture proof if wanted.
 

gcbenji0

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Posts
433
Media
10
Likes
14
Points
163
Location
Los Angeles
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
The vast majority of men, including male porn stars, greatly exaggerate the size of their peters. We all should know that by now.

Real Length Conversion Chart (relatively accurate:tongue:)

8 inches length = 6 inches length
9 inches length = 7 inches length
10 inches length = 8 inches length (quite uncommon)

Girth figures are rarely given because so few dudes have big girth (anything over 6.5 inches)

Big length is still a lot more common than big girth

Any girth truly over 7 inches is a rare commodity.

rare, yes; i wouldn't call it a commodity.
and yeah dudes lie alot about it, but i'm really 8 on (a good day)
 

patrick222

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Posts
159
Media
0
Likes
12
Points
163
Location
Virginia
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I like the conversion factors> television adds 10 pounds ; the internet adds 2 inches. Then add the following marriage conversion factors : 3 inches plus 7 MILLION dollars equals a 10 , 4 inches plus 6 MILLION dollars equal a 10 and so on
 

BIGBULL29

Worshipped Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
7,619
Media
52
Likes
14,293
Points
343
Location
State College (Pennsylvania, United States)
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
I'd like to know where they buy their rulers or measuring tapes, because going by the stats they give their centerfold, I'd be 10"


Going by the Playgirl measuring stick, I'd have an 11" inches and 12" length.:biggrin1:

I think we need to redefine what it is to be hung. If most of these porn studs and Playgirl models are hung, I don't know what I am. :rolleyes:
 

LoneWolf10

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Posts
63
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
93
Location
LA
Gender
Male
I'm on LPSG now ATTEMPTING to research cock size. Same problems as before:

1) The "information" is scattered everywhere, almost impossible to find;
2) There is almost no reliable information; and
3) There is too much useless fucking bullshit about NOTHING.

In this thread, about the dead Playgirl magazine (which has zero credibility in science) there is some "information" about a cock size study. BUT THE MOTHERFUCKER WHO POSTED IT HAS NOT READ IT!

Nobody else who posted in this thread has read it.

LPSG is fucking bullshit! It exhausted itself years ago and is just a social site where shit heads waste their time--because it's a BAD HABIT for them.

I have a "Guide to Celebrity Monster Cocks" on the internet (it will also be included in one of my books) that makes LPSG look like a silly joke. It's the only such guide in the world, and I'm proud that I did it, but feel shame for humanity that I had to do it.

Currently I'm working on a "Guide to Male Pornographic Actors" and LPSG is a fucking waste of time for this very experienced first-rate researcher. LPSG is shit!

Get me out of here! Get this fucking useless website off the internet!
 
Last edited:

D_Maureen Biologist

Account Disabled
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Posts
65
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
91
hmmm- Lone Wolf 10...what a insightful rant.... I would say your moniker is appropriate.

Such anger because this site is not providing you with what you "need" is very telling - in and of itself.

Perhaps you need a break from your "research" as it seems to be warping your "little" mind....(could it be 'penis envy' rearing it's ugly head???)

Chill - take a day off, go F*ck yourself - whatever it takes, but don't blame this site for your 'short-cummings'.... (wink)
 

EL_Duderino

Experimental Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Posts
382
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
163
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
lol, what a whiny punk. he doesn't have what he wants so he write a rant about how this site sucks cause he was not waited on hand and foot to be provided the information he wants for his "research".
 

B_625girth

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2007
Posts
2,224
Media
0
Likes
138
Points
193
Location
midwest
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
gee, let's dig up a year old thread and go on a rant.

from the OP, I didn't know that having a thick girth, over 6", was 1 in a 1000 for "schlong-sporting guys." are there non "schlong-sporting guys."????

i'm 7.25 x 6.25. if I was .75 longer I would be 1 out of 100 to go with my 1 out of 1000 for my over 6" girth. for sometime I have not put too much faith in any surveys or measurements.
 

Beachbumm

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Posts
22
Media
10
Likes
3
Points
223
Location
Virginia (United States)
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
I am relatively new here but i would still like to Welcome You to LPSG forum.
The fact that you are doing research on this subject is amazing and I am sure that you will be able to help enlighten those that are around you.
YES, there isnt much information here in this thread as you say
However.... it was/is well over a year since the last post had been posted.
Not only that, but as why are you looking for a study that has "zero credibility in science"

If you are researching these things wouldn't you try to inform people about such subjects instead of wielding strong verbal lashings with vulgar language?

I am sorry that you feel that "LPSG is bullshit" and "exhausted itself years ago"

Congrats on your book, but why would you feel shame on something that you did on your own free will?

If you are a "experienced first-rate researcher" and you use this type language....
what do all the non experienced 23-rate researchers have to do to get to your level?

I am currently a 50th-rate researcher and would like to crawl my way up through the ranks. Thank you for any information/experience or tips that you may be able to pass my way