Playgirl Plus

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm subscribed to the site and I don't mind it. For the record I'm only interested with the Men of the Month section - compared to the archive over at AdonisMale there are fewer older images from past issues currently available. I don't know if any of the editorials from the new website have never been shared on the other Playgirl forum before.

As for the Men of the Month... for me it's mostly a hit than miss. A majority of the models go full frontal and most of them are attractive to me. As of now only two models don't show cock, and yes, Nick was one of those shyer people. He doesn't get proper naked in his shoot at all! Also, I don't know if this is a problem for some people, but for a site that's supposed to appeal to a straight female audience they have quite the tendency for photographing gay models (I think there are at least two such men featured thus far). You might also notice that many of them have been plucked from the world of Instagram, a fair few of which don't appear to have a strong presence on the internet besides this website. It's just a small gripe but not so much that it affects my experience fully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dom1000
I'm enjoying it. Of course, as a female, I like the more seductive quality of the pictures. It isn't like the Playgirl of the late 90's and 2000's.... close ups of hard-ons, etc. It is more like pictures of handsome men who happen to be naked. Very sexy to me.
 
Caio Brum in November
There are 35 photos in Caio's photoshoot and he does go full frontal in it. But a lot of people have left poor reviews for his shoot, not because that he isn't good looking (he is really hot!), but because he doesn't have a video to go with it. Why didn't he make a BTS clip of his shoot?
 
There are 35 photos in Caio's photoshoot and he does go full frontal in it. But a lot of people have left poor reviews for his shoot, not because that he isn't good looking (he is really hot!), but because he doesn't have a video to go with it. Why didn't he make a BTS clip of his shoot?
I really want to see the photoshoot, but I'm not a subscriber. Can you share the photos with me?
 
Kurt of September 2022, may i know if he went full frontal? Thank you!
I'm subscribed to the site and I don't mind it. For the record I'm only interested with the Men of the Month section - compared to the archive over at AdonisMale there are fewer older images from past issues currently available. I don't know if any of the editorials from the new website have never been shared on the other Playgirl forum before.

As for the Men of the Month... for me it's mostly a hit than miss. A majority of the models go full frontal and most of them are attractive to me. As of now only two models don't show cock, and yes, Nick was one of those shyer people. He doesn't get proper naked in his shoot at all! Also, I don't know if this is a problem for some people, but for a site that's supposed to appeal to a straight female audience they have quite the tendency for photographing gay models (I think there are at least two such men featured thus far). You might also notice that many of them have been plucked from the world of Instagram, a fair few of which don't appear to have a strong presence on the internet besides this website. It's just a small gripe but not so much that it affects my experience fully.
 
Kurt of September 2022, may i know if he went full frontal? Thank you!
Yes he does. He shows his penis like on his OF. Don’t remember if there were some erections or not. Loved the sweaty boxing heme, too - it suited his hairy dad bod look well!
 
Not as enamored as I initially was. One model a month, and the last few have been duds in my opinion.

I know everyone's opinion and taste will vary.

While I wouldn't say "Duds", I do agree with rhis general statement. Kurt Bradford was STUNNING. But its been downhill since.

And it should ALWAYS be a requirement for models to show cock in Playgirl!
 
I like what they are offering when they do have full nudes. It is definitely a throwback. More artistic and less like porn, in my opinion, but still sexy.
Agree, though, that they should ALWAYS show full frontal nudity. The erections of the 90's made it more like porn, and if you want porn you can go to countless other sites now.
 
I
I like what they are offering when they do have full nudes. It is definitely a throwback. More artistic and less like porn, in my opinion, but still sexy.
Agree, though, that they should ALWAYS show full frontal nudity. The erections of the 90's made it more like porn, and if you want porn you can go to countless other sites now.

I can go either way with erections.
It's dependent on theme and photographer for me.

Sometimes it serves to heighten/accentuate a particularly erotic shoot or model, other times it seems like a distraction and reeks of trying too hard, honestly.

Just my opinion: YMMV of course.
 
How do you know?

he was the main reason I joined the website but unfortunately no nudity even though he clearly posed full frontal nude for the photographer

next month's model is going
he was the main reason I joined the website but unfortunately no nudity even though he clearly posed full frontal nude for the photographer

next month's model is going to be Fiachra
 
Status
Not open for further replies.