Just an observation. Didn't realize all posts were required to be "helpful".
What so it's OK for you to disparage the helpfulness of other people's posts but it's not OK for someone to question your posts ?
Just an observation. Didn't realize all posts were required to be "helpful".
"IMHO, the guys who say they are 99% straight are uusally more straight than the guys who claim to be 100% straight. Just for the simple fact that the 100% guys seem to be trying too hard. The guys who say 99% straight probably are 100% straight but just have the brains and balls to admit that we all are bisexual to some degree."
I think you nailed it, BigDallasDick.
What so it's OK for you to disparage the helpfulness of other people's posts but it's not OK for someone to question your posts ?
Of course it's okay to question others' posts. I have never said or implied otherwise. But I did not disparage or even criticize anyone here, I merely observed that a lot of opinions are presented here as fact. Statements to the effect (for instance) that everyone is part gay cannot be supported as fact and should not be presented as such without appropriate references and/or citations. Had I the time or inclination I'm sure I could find others in this and other threads.
By the way, have not your last two posts disparaged me? How has that been "helpful", except to your own ego?
Have fun. It's Saturday night, and I have game to go to, and a blizzard to fight to get there.
No one here is 100% straight as they say, so I think once you join and post pics you're 1%
There IS in fact such a thing as 100% gay. I am definitely one, women do NOT turn me on one bit, and the sight of a naked woman DOES turn me off completely.
And 1% gay is silly I dunno what does it mean exactly
I'm sorry but i can't buy the argument that i am hearing that you cannot be 100% straight or gay on the basis that you can recognise physical beauty in a person whom you have 'no' 'sexual' 'interest'.
I think my xmas tree looks pretty, i'm not about to start playing with its baubells!
There is NO denial in being 100% when you categorically have no sexual interest or desire to experiment with a person that does not fit your interest. Give me a break!
I think you didn't quite get my point, buddy.
Lots of straight men have "jealously" attraction, even though though some of them aren't into sucking dick. Most love seeing those big peters in porn.
When straight men often say they're repulsed by naked men, it's just to make themselves look hyper heterosexual (majority of them). When a real gay man says he's repulsed by a naked women, it's the truth.:wink:
I think you didn't quite get my point, buddy.
Lots of straight men have "jealously" attraction, even though though some of them aren't into sucking dick. Most love seeing those big peters in porn.
When straight men often say they're repulsed by naked men, it's just to make themselves look hyper heterosexual (majority of them). When a real gay man says he's repulsed by a naked women, it's the truth.:wink:
Ok, so gay men can't be jealous of big cock? I doubt that the sight of a big cock is enough to invoke ANY level of attraction. Gay guys=attraction and or jealousy, Straight guys= just jealousy (unless they are already not 100%)
You basically suggest ironically that the tiny percent of homoseuality that is 'jealousy attraction' (wherever that phrase originates?) can only be experienced by straight guys thus rendering them not 100%. what comes next i wonder, gay guys don't experience it cos they're already gay? hmmmmmmm