transformer_99
Experimental Member
I agree with you.....i also heard the men exclaimed they were armed.....i really wish it was possible to get an unbiased story bc otherwise all you get are opinions which are bullshit
And especially in this case it's a situation of a massacre where "dead men tell no tales". I think that's why in the face of irrefutable video and audio evidences (often times 911 calls and the like give that realistic account, but may be unapplicable in this incident), a latitude of benefit of the doubt has to be extended the police, simply because the system assumes innocent until proven guilty. Devoid of a confession, it's anyone's guess as to how it really went down, blow by blow.
As for video and audio evidences, this may be a product that I'd be certainly more interested in seeing available as an option in today's motor vehicles. That is, as opposed to a dvd lcd screen on the back of every seat/headrest, the same video & audio surveilance system that the Highway Patrol has installed in their squad cars. This way, let's say one gets pulled over and it's a matter of one's word vs another's as to what happened, play it back for the judge and be done with it. If it's a gross case of dwb or whatever, it'll be there for all to see. There might even be larger settlements involved that never even make it to the courtrooms. I don't know, any thoughts pro or con ?