Beware of statistics. Found a great PDF n Ontario health system surgerys by region within Ontario, and had a section on circumcision. Showed rates as low as 6% in Kingston, and as high as 46% in Lodon and I think Ottawa was at 44%, Toronto at 22% etc. HIOWEVER, reading the fine print is important: The statistics only included circumcision on babies done at same stay as birth. So parents getting baby born, and going to a clinic to get sone done a few days later wasn't included. This starts to matter when the health insurance no longer covers circ and parents can get their boy snipped for much cheaper at a clinic vs going back to hospital a few days later and paying higher rate. Also much easier to just to go nearby clinic than to go back to a hoispital where it takes longer etc.
In days when mothers stayed in hospitals longer after birth, it made sense to get boy done at same time. But as they discharge mothers earlier now, it has changed how boys get done. So it becomes much harder to get realistic sattistics. You need to wait 18 years to see how the fresh crop of young adulst (no hair on chest yet) look like to see what the circ rate was 18 years before.
In montreal for instance, late 1990s/early 1980s you got to see the new "uncut generation" in locker rooms all sporting long foreskins. It was easy to guess: if no hair on chest, then there was a foreskin on dick. Now of course, that generation has reached late 40s so you there is no longer a demarcation between generation that are and aren't cut. (though prior to 1980, the circ rate in Québec was already near 50% in Montréal).
A pediatrician who get to see many patients woudl have a good idea though of circ rate in society. But that would be anectotal, not "statistics".