Just kidding, broseph.
Alright. Kinda hard to detect sarcasm through text at times. Just please never call me "broseph" again.:biggrin1:
Just kidding, broseph.
Yeah, it'd be neat if the poll said it was private, then popped up with SUCKER! after you voted.The answer is yes.
That's a shame.
Personally, I'd prefer to know who they are.
Alright. Kinda hard to detect sarcasm through text at times. Just please never call me "broseph" again.:biggrin1:
Yeah, it'd be neat if the poll said it was private, then popped up with SUCKER! after you voted.
Glad you approve.You're evil. We like that! :biggrin1:
Fixed that 4 U, rex.As of now, only 8% of this thread's voters believe that Obama is not a natural born citizen.
Whoa, when did the question become his citizenship status? That's not of much interest.
The question is, is The Won above the law, or not?
If he's not above the law, then the legal requirements as set out in the Constitution apply. Unfortunately, nobody alive today knows exactly what the text means. "Natural born" is obviously subject to some leeway in interpretation.
There is some reason to suspect that the requirement was put in by enemies of Alexander Hamilton, who was born in the West Indies. But, cryptic or not, the requirement remains in the Constitution, and so is the Law of the Land, unless of course the candidate is above such mundane things.
And no, I'm not the "no" vote. I have no idea if he's a citizen, or if he meets the Constitutional requirements. And until solid documentation appears, there's no way most of us can know one way or another. Anything else is a statement of faith, not fact.
What's the reasoning behind his peace prize tho? (Just wondering).
The robots always win (unless zombies are in competition).