Poll: Republicans Think Obama Is A Socialist, Palin More Qualified To Be President

[D_Kaye Throttlebottom]

The public's absurd fascination with Sarah Palin reminds me a lot of the initial attraction people had with Dan Quayle. It's laughable and it will pass.

 

[D_Kaye Throttlebottom]

And a week later the Washington Post cited that she may draw celebrity, but cannot turn that to votes:

"A new Washington Post-ABC News poll found that 71 percent of Americans do not think the politician (who was Sen. John McCain's running mate in 2008) is qualified to be president."

Now I don't know whether to laugh or cry at the following statistics, they are startling:
• 39% of Republicans want President Obama to be impeached.
• 63% think Obama is a socialist.
• Only 42% believe Obama was born in the United States.
• 53% think Sarah Palin is more qualified than Obama to be president.
• 23% want to secede from the United States.
• 73% think gay people should not be allowed to teach in public schools.
• 31% want contraception to be outlawed.

Poll: Republicans Think Obama Is A Socialist, And Palin More Qualified To Be President | TPMDC

 

[StormfrontFL]

Pick these sources apart, please:

U.S. Census Bureau
WebMD
USgovinfo.com
usgovernmentspending.com

Again, you complain about my sources, but don't even use sources yourself.

FYI, US Census is not right wing.

FYI, WebMd is not right wing.

FYI, USgovinfo.com is not right wing.

FYI, usgovernmentspending.com is not right wing.

Why didn't you address these sources? Could it be because YOU are in the habit of half-stories and half-truths?

Does this bring back memories Star?
Originally Posted by Bbucko

BTW- you're not on point: the teabaggery is most emphatically not about tax hikes. It's about being against everything and for not much of anything.
And you draw this informed summary from what?... a few clips from a liberal news outlet?
This was your response in another thread. You have a problem with anyone using a "liberal" news source but find it completely justified that you use conservative sources. As to the issue of some of the sources you listed above, I simply find it a waste of time to dlve into them because you only select enough info from those sites to support your views and discard info from those same sites that counter your arguments.

 

[ZOS23xy]

And a week later the Washington Post cited that she may draw celebrity, but cannot turn that to votes:

"A new Washington Post-ABC News poll found that 71 percent of Americans do not think the politician (who was Sen. John McCain's running mate in 2008) is qualified to be president."

Start a poll and ask: "Do you think blue is a good color?" If the percentile goes to 60% negative, headlines can shout "Blue is on the way out.!!!!"

Slant your language and you can write reams of this crap.

 

[Alaboner]

A thread full of massive inaccurate generalizations with less-than-accurate "statistics" to back them up. Why am I not surprised?

 

[ZOS23xy]

A thread full of massive inaccurate generalizations with less-than-accurate "statistics" to back them up. Why am I not surprised?

Reading your post I wonder, "what's this guy talking about? Who is this post aimed for? What does it mean?"

I dunno.

 

[SilverTrain]

A thread full of massive inaccurate generalizations with less-than-accurate "statistics" to back them up.

Don't forget about the "condescending griping that fails to advance the discussion one iota."