Poll.... You Decide Should We Issue Warnings For Posting "bump" Yes Or No?

[bmagic]

But bumpers should face some kind of penalty. I've seen people just make a thread and 10 mins later someone puts bump or someone would bump then an hour or so later someone would bump again. I've even seen people start their thread with bump like come on

 

[shyguyy]

A day isn't that long a wait, the minimum should be 3. The punishment for doing it can be altered as well. And for those saying there's a workaround for bumpers to alternate methods, there's also a report button. If it's a pattern that can be picked up on then that could also be handled accordingly.

People share content all the time and instead of it being met with a discussion it's responded to with post more. If this really is a place for discussion, let's bring more of that to the table.

 

[nightbat]

I truly think it’s the fact that ppl are just annoyed at the word

No one is mad at a word...

Bumping threads is like getting spam emails flooding your inbox, it's extremely annoying, time consuming, contributes nothing, and 99% of the time leads to nothing new actually being posted.

There is a search feature, if people used it more bumping would become irrelevant.

Not a single bump should be tolerated, there is not a single justifiably reason to bump a thread.

 

[Neek1949]

Yes. It gets my hopes up that something good was posted.

 

[Darthchi]

There should def. be warnings when a thread is bumped less than a day since the last activity. If someone replaces his/her bump by a comment, then this comment should be related to the last post or related to it, otherwise it would be a disguised bump. E.g: if the guy makes the same comment 5 times in 3 days that the model in the thread is hot...it’s a disguised bump. And anyway there will be warnings issued before bans so people could sill have the possibility to explain themselves

 

[Darthchi]

Edit* Oh and there should def. be warnings for people creating new threads when there are already one or two created, and they did not take the time to search so they post in all
Three of them when something comes up...

 

[Squirrel1]

Edit* Oh and there should def. be warnings for people creating new threads when there are already one or two created, and they did not take the time to search so they post in all
Three of them when something comes up...

That one would be harder to police.

 

[DvdHbsn]

if the last post was yesterday or worse- that day, then YES! But- if it's been a week, I'm fine with it.

 

[iamthenithrey]

I don't mind a bump every now and then ;p

 

[Darthchi]

I don't mind a bump every now and then ;p

Even after less than 12 hours?

 

[college48]

It is annoying, but I’m not for adding more rules. It’s an online community looking at hot men, there’s going to be all sorts in the room. I say we just deal with it and they’ll soon tire themselves out.

 

[digitalone]

I think the bumping is fine, but maybe quantify a reasonable timeframe like what others have suggested.

Just digressing, there is another annoying behaviour. When a topic thread is started of a particular model/celebrity, there is almost always someone who claims to have videos or photos of the person discussed, but will never share anything. Half the time, these claims are just put out there to annoy the heck out of people.

My view is that if you don't intend to share (either publicly or privately), what is the point of mentioning "yes, I have the photo of so-and-so full frontal naked", or "yes, it exists and I have it, but I won't show you or share it or even prove it with a cropped photo" etc.

 

[shyguyy]

I can tell a bunch of you've never received a strike on here yet .

 

[rokkstar]

Maybe once a week or something, not every day or 2. What really needs to be taken care of is the people trying to sell or trade. They pop up everywhere, this site was never about selling or trading. They need to be banned for solicitation.

 

[nicnic]

Bumps are annoying and they should be against the rules. But as infractions go, they're small and shouldn't be over-policed. I am sometimes frustrated when I encounter a user whose only posts are repeated bumps. They contribute nothing to the community. We should have a policy to deal with that.

 

[neonkream]

Yes please!

 

[LPSG Support]

I’d rather you did something about having to scroll though like 10 pages of people arguing back and forth before you get to any actual content!

Click Most liked posts

 

[JonSnow]

It should be allowed only on posts more than two weeks old.

 

[Chickenlips]

I'd much prefer warnings for trying to trade or for time wasters. They ruin the dynamic of threads and are never popular

 

[Bertster01]

that being said I think monitoring and handing out infections to those who bump overzealously could be beneficial

You just keep those to yourself thank you very much.