- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Posts
- 13,348
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 1,666
- Points
- 168
- Location
- San Francisco Bay Area
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Came across an intereseting article that big dick Justin Long will no longer do interacial porn. Here's a little clip of the article
being Black a target? Is it the kiss of death in the industry? A couple male performers I know are Black, but very light skinned, and seem to work with these girls on a regular basis as they have not been LABELED Black. Non-IR girls have no issues shooting with them, so you would think maybe it's just the color of the skin, but then you get to darker European, Asian and Latino male talent and all of a sudden brown skin has no bearing. So, does "it's not personal" continue to fly as a real statement? Absolutely not. Girls and agents like to say that saving IR extends the life of a girls' career. I have very serious doubts about that and will use a star I have worked with many times as an example. This girl has shot IR from day one in the industry (as far as I am aware). Very early in her career I had shot with her more then any male in the industry (white, Black or other). Now she is arguably the biggest contract star in the world. So tell me exactly how did IR extend or hurt her career. The fact is that non-IR girls use Black male talent as stepping stones, and that is morally bankrupt in thought and action. Girls are permitted to do IR and then not do IR and then start to do it again when there work slows. The sad part is Black male talent are willing to shoot with these girls, and basically telling them it's OK to exhibit this moral lacking behavior, and it's alright to disrupt our income. Black males are telling these girls that we are OK with the scraps that they are throwing are way.
Here's the rest of it guys:
An Open Letter from Justin Long: "I Will No Longer Do Interracial Porn." (Papi Chulo's BLOG)
being Black a target? Is it the kiss of death in the industry? A couple male performers I know are Black, but very light skinned, and seem to work with these girls on a regular basis as they have not been LABELED Black. Non-IR girls have no issues shooting with them, so you would think maybe it's just the color of the skin, but then you get to darker European, Asian and Latino male talent and all of a sudden brown skin has no bearing. So, does "it's not personal" continue to fly as a real statement? Absolutely not. Girls and agents like to say that saving IR extends the life of a girls' career. I have very serious doubts about that and will use a star I have worked with many times as an example. This girl has shot IR from day one in the industry (as far as I am aware). Very early in her career I had shot with her more then any male in the industry (white, Black or other). Now she is arguably the biggest contract star in the world. So tell me exactly how did IR extend or hurt her career. The fact is that non-IR girls use Black male talent as stepping stones, and that is morally bankrupt in thought and action. Girls are permitted to do IR and then not do IR and then start to do it again when there work slows. The sad part is Black male talent are willing to shoot with these girls, and basically telling them it's OK to exhibit this moral lacking behavior, and it's alright to disrupt our income. Black males are telling these girls that we are OK with the scraps that they are throwing are way.
Here's the rest of it guys:
An Open Letter from Justin Long: "I Will No Longer Do Interracial Porn." (Papi Chulo's BLOG)