I think hes gotta have a big one and a nice thick bush too :loveya:Originally posted by wweisben@Sep 30 2005, 05:29 PM
average i really do think theres nothing special
[post=347755]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by yellowtshirt@Sep 30 2005, 11:33 AM
I think hes gotta have a big one and a nice thick bush too :loveya:
I seem to remember reading something once that royalty were circumcised to distinguish themselves from the common folk. I remember thinking at the time "how dumb" - are the royalty going to whip their dicks out at the common folk to show how distinguished their lack of foreskin is? But you'd know more than I would about the English royalty. The same story claimed Diane bucked tradition and refused to have the sons chopped mainly because she just didn't believe in it. Lucky boys.Originally posted by Dr Rock@Sep 30 2005, 09:25 PM
yeah, charles has said that he's circumcised (dunno why) and his kids aren't. I recall that being one of the talking points of some retarded newspaper article people were tittering over a few years back.
[post=347905]Quoted post[/post]
James Hewitt is very well hung and hick too, could it be a case of like father like son?Originally posted by Adam875@Oct 1 2005, 07:13 AM
As for "WHO Harry's father is ..." - there have always been the James Hewitt rumours, based on Diana's affair and the fact of Harry's 'dead ringer' likeness to him. It was Kitty Kelly (US author) in her book on the English Royals (incidentally banned from publication in the UK! who recorded the fact that Hewitt was "well hung". So ...?
[post=347939]Quoted post[/post]
:shrug: never heard that, but I'd consider it fairly unlikely - every known royal tradition is already well-documented, and I doubt researchers would've missed something like that.Originally posted by cityboy@Oct 1 2005, 03:04 AM
I seem to remember reading something once that royalty were circumcised to distinguish themselves from the common folk.[post=347920]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Jason@Oct 1 2005, 07:44 PM
Serious queation:
William is going to be first Prince of Wales, Duke of Cornwall, Duke of Rothsay, and later king of England, Scotland, Canada and Australia, Duke of Lancaster, and hold a lot more titles besides. In the UK he will be head of state, head of the armed forces, will have enormous theoretical powers (eg to sack the prime minister, to make laws without parliament) and a lot more real powers (eg appoint and dismiss judges, be consulted every week by the prime minister, open parliament, grant honours).
Would having a big dick - or being thought to have a big dick - help him discharge these responsibilities well?
[post=348082]Quoted post[/post]
... assuming the monarchy even lasts that long, which appears less and less likely all the time.Originally posted by Jason@Oct 1 2005, 11:44 PM
William is going to be first Prince of Wales, Duke of Cornwall, Duke of Rothsay, and later king of England, Scotland, Canada and Australia, Duke of Lancaster, and hold a lot more titles besides. In the UK he will be head of state, head of the armed forces, will have enormous theoretical powers (eg to sack the prime minister, to make laws without parliament) and a lot more real powers (eg appoint and dismiss judges, be consulted every week by the prime minister, open parliament, grant honours).[post=348082]Quoted post[/post]