B_cigarbabe
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2006
- Posts
- 3,872
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 24
- Points
- 183
- Location
- Boston,Mass.
- Sexuality
- 60% Gay, 40% Straight
This debate seems to hinge around word-games by redefining what a human being is. Once the egg becomes fertilized you have the entire DNA for that human being. It does not matter if it is one second old or 8 months or 80 years old it is a human being just at a different stage of life.
If you abort it you have killed a human being.
So the argument is really over does a woman have a choice to murder another human being that she finds inconvenient and if we frame the debate in the correct terms most people can come to the logical and humanistic conclusion that murder is wrong.
It is only when we obfuscate the terms to soften the reality that it muddies the clarity of what should be a simple realization that murder is wrong.
So, if I understand you correctly,God,killed my first pregnancy?
My first pregnancy was an ectopic one.
This I would've had,simply because, I was too stupid, and naive, to know any better,and at twenty-one I thought all women were supposed to have babies to be "fulfilled". Since I didn't "murder "this one, by your definition,then the same terms apply,right?
GOD KILLED MY BABY!!!
Horror of Horrors!
cigarbabe:saevil: