Proliferation Of "bwc"

dylz

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Posts
1,133
Media
39
Likes
3,625
Points
543
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
of course i am referring not to an increase in prevalence of big dick among whites but rather the seemingly dramatically increasing numbers of well endowed white men who seem to find the white part noteworthy, and who consequently identify with this term online. surely i'm not the only one who's noticed it popping up more lately -- correct me if i'm mistaken. i'm not imagining things, am i?

first: yes, noting incidental, cultural and racial characteristics of dick, fundamentally silly as it is, has been a thing forever. indeed there is a "big white cocks" thread on the front page of this section that dates back to 2015. but the level of obsession exhibited lately by some of the folks now identifying with the term "BWC" (and apparently the second adjective in particular) is downright bizarre and borderline alarming. i saw a dude online (with, yes, a very big dick) post a pic of himself to a big dick subreddit literally just captioned "white" as if this somehow said it all. unsurprisingly "BWC" was in his profile and literally everything he posted made mention of his race in this manner. i seriously would not be surprised if this guy looks down at his own dick and thinks about how beautiful and big and WHITE it is.

like, what is going on here?? the term now seems nearly as prevalent as its forebear "BBC" and i can't help but suspect that some of these hung white dudes get off on feeling that they're comparable to the men who carry the earlier label, particularly the massive-dicked, hyper-stereotypical ones that tend to be shown in the 'racially charged' "IR" porns that are produced primarily for white people's consumption (Blacked etc.), the idea that they themselves possess, basically, the white version of the BBC. (i hesitate to mention this because it's awful, but it has also come to my attention that some white people get off on referring to other white people's large dicks as "[racist slur]dicks" or similar, and that some men with "BWCs" get messaged online by fetishists using such terms, sometimes to their horror)

i saw a fella on an app the other day w/ this term in his profile. he sent me a dick pic and honestly he was... probably a few microns over average? like, literally the only accurate adjective in this bizarre initialism he apparently identifies with, and uses to advertise himself on the meatmarket, is "white". the appeal of believing oneself to carry a BWC must be palpable if those who don't even have big dicks are proudly waving the term around.

are white men more interested in and turned on by the whiteness of their dicks (whether big or simply "big") these days? why?
 

ericbear

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 14, 2002
Posts
2,861
Media
35
Likes
6,189
Points
568
Location
Santa Ana (California, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I have never used the term myself, preferring to refer to it as my big fat DaddyDick. However, when I visited a gorgeous sexy young man that I fuck from time to time, who happens to be black, he told me me wanted to be fucked with my BWC until one of us drops from exhaustion. Which is just what we did.

Why did he use that term? He well knows I'm completely indifferent to race. I think because it's just a funny twist on the BBC cliche, and nothing more expressed or implied. (Except I do have a big dick.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: downpour

Mount Phalic

Legendary Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2021
Posts
872
Media
0
Likes
2,020
Points
138
Location
Menlo Park, CA, USA
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
I have never used the term myself, preferring to refer to it as my big fat DaddyDick. However, when I visited a gorgeous sexy young man that I fuck from time to time, who happens to be black, he told me me wanted to be fucked with my BWC until one of us drops from exhaustion. Which is just what we did.

Why did he use that term? He well knows I'm completely indifferent to race. I think because it's just a funny twist on the BBC cliche, and nothing more expressed or implied. (Except I do have a big dick.)
It's descriptive, big, white cock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dummythicc

Mount Phalic

Legendary Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2021
Posts
872
Media
0
Likes
2,020
Points
138
Location
Menlo Park, CA, USA
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
of course i am referring not to an increase in prevalence of big dick among whites but rather the seemingly dramatically increasing numbers of well endowed white men who seem to find the white part noteworthy, and who consequently identify with this term online. surely i'm not the only one who's noticed it popping up more lately -- correct me if i'm mistaken. i'm not imagining things, am i?

first: yes, noting incidental, cultural and racial characteristics of dick, fundamentally silly as it is, has been a thing forever. indeed there is a "big white cocks" thread on the front page of this section that dates back to 2015. but the level of obsession exhibited lately by some of the folks now identifying with the term "BWC" (and apparently the second adjective in particular) is downright bizarre and borderline alarming. i saw a dude online (with, yes, a very big dick) post a pic of himself to a big dick subreddit literally just captioned "white" as if this somehow said it all. unsurprisingly "BWC" was in his profile and literally everything he posted made mention of his race in this manner. i seriously would not be surprised if this guy looks down at his own dick and thinks about how beautiful and big and WHITE it is.

like, what is going on here?? the term now seems nearly as prevalent as its forebear "BBC" and i can't help but suspect that some of these hung white dudes get off on feeling that they're comparable to the men who carry the earlier label, particularly the massive-dicked, hyper-stereotypical ones that tend to be shown in the 'racially charged' "IR" porns that are produced primarily for white people's consumption (Blacked etc.), the idea that they themselves possess, basically, the white version of the BBC. (i hesitate to mention this because it's awful, but it has also come to my attention that some white people get off on referring to other white people's large dicks as "[racist slur]dicks" or similar, and that some men with "BWCs" get messaged online by fetishists using such terms, sometimes to their horror)

i saw a fella on an app the other day w/ this term in his profile. he sent me a dick pic and honestly he was... probably a few microns over average? like, literally the only accurate adjective in this bizarre initialism he apparently identifies with, and uses to advertise himself on the meatmarket, is "white". the appeal of believing oneself to carry a BWC must be palpable if those who don't even have big dicks are proudly waving the term around.

are white men more interested in and turned on by the whiteness of their dicks (whether big or simply "big") these days? why?
What a bizarre post. You're trying so hard to find something offensive in something that is descriptive. Big, white, cock. It's amaking to me that someone could be offended by this. Drop the misplaced guilt. White men can identify too.
 

aaronvasser123

Superior Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Posts
911
Media
0
Likes
3,869
Points
258
of course i am referring not to an increase in prevalence of big dick among whites but rather the seemingly dramatically increasing numbers of well endowed white men who seem to find the white part noteworthy, and who consequently identify with this term online. surely i'm not the only one who's noticed it popping up more lately -- correct me if i'm mistaken. i'm not imagining things, am i?

first: yes, noting incidental, cultural and racial characteristics of dick, fundamentally silly as it is, has been a thing forever. indeed there is a "big white cocks" thread on the front page of this section that dates back to 2015. but the level of obsession exhibited lately by some of the folks now identifying with the term "BWC" (and apparently the second adjective in particular) is downright bizarre and borderline alarming. i saw a dude online (with, yes, a very big dick) post a pic of himself to a big dick subreddit literally just captioned "white" as if this somehow said it all. unsurprisingly "BWC" was in his profile and literally everything he posted made mention of his race in this manner. i seriously would not be surprised if this guy looks down at his own dick and thinks about how beautiful and big and WHITE it is.

like, what is going on here?? the term now seems nearly as prevalent as its forebear "BBC" and i can't help but suspect that some of these hung white dudes get off on feeling that they're comparable to the men who carry the earlier label, particularly the massive-dicked, hyper-stereotypical ones that tend to be shown in the 'racially charged' "IR" porns that are produced primarily for white people's consumption (Blacked etc.), the idea that they themselves possess, basically, the white version of the BBC. (i hesitate to mention this because it's awful, but it has also come to my attention that some white people get off on referring to other white people's large dicks as "[racist slur]dicks" or similar, and that some men with "BWCs" get messaged online by fetishists using such terms, sometimes to their horror)

i saw a fella on an app the other day w/ this term in his profile. he sent me a dick pic and honestly he was... probably a few microns over average? like, literally the only accurate adjective in this bizarre initialism he apparently identifies with, and uses to advertise himself on the meatmarket, is "white". the appeal of believing oneself to carry a BWC must be palpable if those who don't even have big dicks are proudly waving the term around.

are white men more interested in and turned on by the whiteness of their dicks (whether big or simply "big") these days? why?
Do you have the same reaction when black people constantly refer to their skin colour, or do you just think that white people should not be allowed to mention their own skin colour for some bizarre reason? I think you are just a bit desperate to be offended about something or want attention. BBC is a term that has been used for quite some time now, so I don't get why BWC should be any different. Yet you find it 'alarming'....
 

cuckboy

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Posts
281
Media
0
Likes
243
Points
78
Do you have the same reaction when black people constantly refer to their skin colour, or do you just think that white people should not be allowed to mention their own skin colour for some bizarre reason? I think you are just a bit desperate to be offended about something or want attention. BBC is a term that has been used for quite some time now, so I don't get why BWC should be any different. Yet you find it 'alarming'....
Because anything about white people automatically means it's racist ,right ?
 

BigDickHunter1

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2020
Posts
359
Media
0
Likes
1,471
Points
288
Age
28
Location
Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
You're gonna get roasted alive for this thread but I do get what you mean. I don't think it's an inherently racist thing like you seem to be implying but I do believe insecurity plays a big part in the proliferation of this term, with BBC porn being as popular as ever these days. Though I've seen and been with hung white men, many of the white guys who throw the term around to describe themselves online aren't really that big and rather just above average. I mean, if I had a dollar for every "BWC" I've seen on Grindr that turned out to be 6"-6.5" I'd probably be rich by now while the same doesn't happen nearly that frequently when it comes to BBC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mount Phalic

vas

Loved Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Posts
173
Media
4
Likes
627
Points
498
Location
Missouri, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
BBC became a commonly understood shorthand for being hung. You see this in some personals looking for a BBC from any race. But it does denote a race so people use the analog, BWC, which everyone can also recognize. And for those that have a racial preference (many do) it provides additional useful information. Why twist it into something else?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mount Phalic

dylz

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Posts
1,133
Media
39
Likes
3,625
Points
543
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
LMAO not the user literally named "cuckboy" getting mad over this. like, sorry some people are able to more-or-less accurately intuit the nature your own racial subjugation fetishes that you continually and plainly make obvious on websites like these. pls continue to advocate for banning "CRT" (= education that accurately describes the racist aspects of the country's history) for the sake of preserving your fragile white children's emotions, snowflake cuck ;)

on a related note, i evidently hit a few nerves with these fairly basic observations but i do find it funny that the common retort among the most obviously angered is to ask why i am so offended or why i'm supposedly seeking to be disturbed by supposedly benign things. in reality there is literally NOTHING in my post indicating any sort of "offense" my end -- i am merely asking questions about what is a pretty obvious sociological phenomenon that i doubt many of you ironically-yourselves-offended respondents would even deny exists. moreover, these questions, being free speech (you know, that thing y'all always claim to be defending?) and all, are rather benign themselves! what an interesting world we live in.

thank you to the few of you so far who have actually engaged with the content of the post rather than just reflexively retorting with the reactionaries' greatest hits for the ten billionth time.

ps: i thought this wouldn't even need to be said, but apparently we as a society are not there yet: the "BBC" archetype is an invention of white people, not black people. some black men who fit the stereotype (or imagine themselves to) claim it out of the desire to claim some sense of sexual empowerment, i guess -- i'm not speaking from my personal perspective here -- but there's zero question that the image has by and large been propagated by products made by white people primarily for their own titillation. i'm sure this paragraph will also be lambasted as "CRT," but frankly to anyone with a function brain who's not a total idiot, it's also just... plainly true? LOL
 
Last edited:

aaronvasser123

Superior Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Posts
911
Media
0
Likes
3,869
Points
258
LMAO not the user literally named "cuckboy" getting mad over this. like, sorry some people are able to more-or-less accurately intuit the nature your own racial subjugation fetishes that you continually and plainly make obvious on websites like these. pls continue to advocate for banning "CRT" (= education that accurately describes the racist aspects of the country's history) for the sake of preserving your fragile white children's emotions, snowflake cuck ;)

on a related note, i evidently hit a few nerves with these fairly basic observations but i do find it funny that the common retort among the most obviously angered is to ask why i am so offended or why i'm supposedly seeking to be disturbed by supposedly benign things. in reality there is literally NOTHING in my post indicating any sort of "offense" my end -- i am merely asking questions about what is a pretty obvious sociological phenomenon that i doubt many of you ironically-yourselves-offended respondents would even deny exists. moreover, these questions, being free speech (you know, that thing y'all always claim to be defending?) and all, are rather benign themselves! what an interesting world we live in.

thank you to the few of you so far who have actually engaged with the content of the post rather than just reflexively retorting with the reactionaries' greatest hits for the ten billionth time.

ps: i thought this wouldn't even need to be said, but apparently we as a society are not there yet: the "BBC" archetype is an invention of white people, not black people. some black men who fit the stereotype (or imagine themselves to) claim it out of the desire to claim some sense of sexual empowerment, i guess -- i'm not speaking from my personal perspective here -- but there's zero question that the image has by and large been propagated by products made by white people primarily for their own titillation. i'm sure this paragraph will also be lambasted as "CRT," but frankly to anyone with a function brain who's not a total idiot, it's also just... plainly true? LOL
It's interesting that the more intelligent you try to make yourself seem, the less intelligent you come across. Strange how that works...
 

Mount Phalic

Legendary Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2021
Posts
872
Media
0
Likes
2,020
Points
138
Location
Menlo Park, CA, USA
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
LMAO not the user literally named "cuckboy" getting mad over this. like, sorry some people are able to more-or-less accurately intuit the nature your own racial subjugation fetishes that you continually and plainly make obvious on websites like these. pls continue to advocate for banning "CRT" (= education that accurately describes the racist aspects of the country's history) for the sake of preserving your fragile white children's emotions, snowflake cuck ;)

on a related note, i evidently hit a few nerves with these fairly basic observations but i do find it funny that the common retort among the most obviously angered is to ask why i am so offended or why i'm supposedly seeking to be disturbed by supposedly benign things. in reality there is literally NOTHING in my post indicating any sort of "offense" my end -- i am merely asking questions about what is a pretty obvious sociological phenomenon that i doubt many of you ironically-yourselves-offended respondents would even deny exists. moreover, these questions, being free speech (you know, that thing y'all always claim to be defending?) and all, are rather benign themselves! what an interesting world we live in.

thank you to the few of you so far who have actually engaged with the content of the post rather than just reflexively retorting with the reactionaries' greatest hits for the ten billionth time.

ps: i thought this wouldn't even need to be said, but apparently we as a society are not there yet: the "BBC" archetype is an invention of white people, not black people. some black men who fit the stereotype (or imagine themselves to) claim it out of the desire to claim some sense of sexual empowerment, i guess -- i'm not speaking from my personal perspective here -- but there's zero question that the image has by and large been propagated by products made by white people primarily for their own titillation. i'm sure this paragraph will also be lambasted as "CRT," but frankly to anyone with a function brain who's not a total idiot, it's also just... plainly true?
LMAO not the user literally named "cuckboy" getting mad over this. like, sorry some people are able to more-or-less accurately intuit the nature your own racial subjugation fetishes that you continually and plainly make obvious on websites like these. pls continue to advocate for banning "CRT" (= education that accurately describes the racist aspects of the country's history) for the sake of preserving your fragile white children's emotions, snowflake cuck ;)

on a related note, i evidently hit a few nerves with these fairly basic observations but i do find it funny that the common retort among the most obviously angered is to ask why i am so offended or why i'm supposedly seeking to be disturbed by supposedly benign things. in reality there is literally NOTHING in my post indicating any sort of "offense" my end -- i am merely asking questions about what is a pretty obvious sociological phenomenon that i doubt many of you ironically-yourselves-offended respondents would even deny exists. moreover, these questions, being free speech (you know, that thing y'all always claim to be defending?) and all, are rather benign themselves! what an interesting world we live in.

thank you to the few of you so far who have actually engaged with the content of the post rather than just reflexively retorting with the reactionaries' greatest hits for the ten billionth time.

ps: i thought this wouldn't even need to be said, but apparently we as a society are not there yet: the "BBC" archetype is an invention of white people, not black people. some black men who fit the stereotype (or imagine themselves to) claim it out of the desire to claim some sense of sexual empowerment, i guess -- i'm not speaking from my personal perspective here -- but there's zero question that the image has by and large been propagated by products made by white people primarily for their own titillation. i'm sure this paragraph will also be lambasted as "CRT," but frankly to anyone with a function brain who's not a total idiot, it's also just... plainly true? LOL
 
D

deleted808122

Guest
The term, the fetish & the entire concept is racist - brought about by those who feel their worth is threatened by the racist & exploitative fetish that is "BBC". There's no basis beyond folklore, fear, reprisal and individual aggrandizement behind any of it.

Drop the damn malanin/cultural/historical references, people. Big dicks are big dicks. Those who insist on bringing evidence to support their racism are part of the problem that everyone is a victim of. "BWC" is nothing more than an admission that racism diminishes the worth of the person, although most using the term won't ever realize it.
 

grizzlysan

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2021
Posts
12
Media
6
Likes
135
Points
38
Location
Orlando (Florida, United States)
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Male
There’s definitely those that use the term as such, primarily the types that obsess over porn using terms such as “bleached” or “blacked” or “colonized”, but it is probably just primarily a way to find big white cocks in general. With bbc porn being more and more prevalent these days and taking up massive amounts of real estate in big dick porn genres, it does make it much easier to find when you’re in the mood to see one or the other. As someone that likes size of any race I am sometimes more into the visual of one or the other and it used to be really hard to find anything where the bull or actor wasn’t exclusively black. Basically I don’t see the term as racist at all, but there are people that would use it in that way, and we can’t let that ruin it for the rest of us that just like big dick lol
 

BigDickHunter1

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2020
Posts
359
Media
0
Likes
1,471
Points
288
Age
28
Location
Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
LMAO not the user literally named "cuckboy" getting mad over this. like, sorry some people are able to more-or-less accurately intuit the nature your own racial subjugation fetishes that you continually and plainly make obvious on websites like these. pls continue to advocate for banning "CRT" (= education that accurately describes the racist aspects of the country's history) for the sake of preserving your fragile white children's emotions, snowflake cuck ;)

on a related note, i evidently hit a few nerves with these fairly basic observations but i do find it funny that the common retort among the most obviously angered is to ask why i am so offended or why i'm supposedly seeking to be disturbed by supposedly benign things. in reality there is literally NOTHING in my post indicating any sort of "offense" my end -- i am merely asking questions about what is a pretty obvious sociological phenomenon that i doubt many of you ironically-yourselves-offended respondents would even deny exists. moreover, these questions, being free speech (you know, that thing y'all always claim to be defending?) and all, are rather benign themselves! what an interesting world we live in.

thank you to the few of you so far who have actually engaged with the content of the post rather than just reflexively retorting with the reactionaries' greatest hits for the ten billionth time.

ps: i thought this wouldn't even need to be said, but apparently we as a society are not there yet: the "BBC" archetype is an invention of white people, not black people. some black men who fit the stereotype (or imagine themselves to) claim it out of the desire to claim some sense of sexual empowerment, i guess -- i'm not speaking from my personal perspective here -- but there's zero question that the image has by and large been propagated by products made by white people primarily for their own titillation. i'm sure this paragraph will also be lambasted as "CRT," but frankly to anyone with a function brain who's not a total idiot, it's also just... plainly true? LOL
It's a delicate issue but one worth discussing, for sure. Good idea for a thread :emoji_thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: dummythicc