No, I don't think it does. It comes under the "let live" part. In the broadest possible terms, there has to be some mutually agreed-upon code of social conduct.
In healthy societies there are times and places where you get to break that code and "let your hair down"; mardi gras, college, bars and clubs, even the amish don't have to be amish their whole lives... But then you have to go back to being a little less wild because otherwise we end up not respecting, but merely tolerating one another. I'm not making a point about this prom girl, about gay marriage, or any other issue with ready made talking points, so just bear with me...
Forgive me for the semantic aside, but I want to try and illustrate where I'm coming from; We really do have a vibrant, healthy culture in this country, warts and all, and I see it being torn down piece by piece under the guise of tolerance. (that twitch, right there? just keep reading) Who isn't in favor of tolerance, right? intolerant people, that's who, and nobody likes them.
Whenever I hear the term "tolerance," it always has always had a grudging undertone to it. I know you didn't use it, I don't like it anyway.
Some groups of people in this country
tolerate others; they don't accept them, they don't respect them, they just tolerate them. People where I live don't tolerate in that sense, they are truly welcoming and couldn't care less what you do in private or who you do it with. Not everyone of course, because I don't live in Pleasantville or Disney World, but acceptance is more the flavor of the area if that makes sense.
I do not see how the requirement that someone be mature and respectful of others in public is repressive or unfair to homosexuals or anyone else. Respect is differnt from tolerance in that you won't get smiles all the time like you do from "tolerant" people, but when you do get one you can be damn sure it's genuine. We've all been on the receiving end of a "tolerant" grin before, don't you just love em?
A gay couple wants to walk down the street holding hands, shares a kiss, where I live, nobody will bat an eye. On the other hand, if someone walks around in high moral dudgeon all the time, makes a scene for no good reason, or cries "homophobe" because someone just
asks that you don't do something that's bothering them, will be regarded as a first rate twat, and rightly so. People always say sexuality is fluid. So are comfort levels around things like public affection. No less legitimate, because it
is a respect thing.
I guess all I'm trying to say is that I take issue with your attitude when you say that a request for respect is against the idea of "live and let live". Live and let live can work, even in the south
, but it can't work if we are only going to "tolerate" one another rather than really try to treat people with dignity. I don't want to just tolerate my neighbors, I'd really rather like them instead.
Of course, I've never been to Mississippi, so I don't know how it works there...