PSA: All You Photoshop/Pic Editing People Aren't Fooling Anyone!

[Indelicate]

more examples of photoshopping:

10inchcock2008 (you will see that the first photo in his gallery is from the same artificer as the photo from muscle14 that i posted earlier; both have been posted in the galleries here by numerous different people pretending to be the owner of this non-existent monster cock)

11incher (the third photo is the giveaway; it reminds me of what lisa simpson says to bart when the latter tries to make the d's on his postcard look like a's instead of more plausible b's: "oh, bart, you got greedy!")

roflmao!!!!!

 

[TheScotsman]

Some people like to live in a fantasy land, I suppose. I guess my only excuse is that I only have a shitty iPhone and webcamera to take photographs with.

 

[Indelicate]

I would be opposed to that. There is too much uncertainty about identifying faked photos, unless you have the original version to put alongside the altered one. As for the ones that are obviously faked -- if they are obviously faked, then there is no need to expose the fakery.

Good point! I wonder if there is a simple software program that can identify a manipulated photograph concisely? Seems that would make it easy to "tag" the fake photos in a gallery for viewers to identify.

It is interesting too that members post photos not of themselves quite often, just to share with others. Most of them are identified in some way that the photo is not of the gallery owner, but often some are not. It would be great to have some way to identify clearly these types of shots as well perhaps.

What does everyone else think?

 

[alwayshornyatl]

Those who are obvious are obvious. But it's all somewhat of a fantasy anyway. Chances are I'll never meet any of you, so if it makes you feel good to tell me your cock is bigger than 90% of men on earth, enjoy yourself.

My favorite "shading" is in professional porn. All of the "models" are 5'10" to 6'3" tall and all have 10" or bigger. I know of one model who is listed as 5'10", yet in a video I could see him standing on two cushions to make him almost as tall as the other "models" in the scene. I would bet the man is no more than 5'2" at best.

As I've always said; "A 5 inch dick looks big on a 5 foot man."

 

[luvmycock]

put on blast, LOL

 

[SyddyKitty]

I have Photoshoppery stuck into an album for fun. I still get people thinking the Album entitled "Photoshops" contains REAL size. It's kind of annoying.... Just goes to show most people don't READ anything when looking at pictures.

http://www.lpsg.org/members/syddykitty/albums/

 

[Donder]

I have Photoshoppery stuck into an album for fun. I still get people thinking the Album entitled "Photoshops" contains REAL size. It's kind of annoying.... Just goes to show most people don't READ anything when looking at pictures.

http://www.lpsg.org/members/syddykitty/albums/

Nice work, great to see the diffrence with the before and after. I don't even know how to do that . I can't see anything what indicates the picture is edited, suppose it's really easy to fool somone. Makes you think...

 

[Indelicate]

What if a photo posted could be submitted for authentication and tagged as genuine? Anything else posted in a gallery would be subject to question otherwise. Just a thought.

 

[Calboner]

I can't see anything what indicates the picture is edited, suppose it's really easy to fool somone. Makes you think...

When the alterations to the photo are modest, as in the examples in SyddyKitty's gallery, it can be difficult or impossible to detect them. But photo-fakers are rarely content with a modest alteration. What, after all, is the payoff then? They almost always enlarge the penis in the photo (which in many cases is not even their in the first place) to such an extent that the disparity of scale between it and the surrounding skin is visible in the texture.

 

[D_Relentless Original]

You should name names and stop beating around the bush.

Aah, but who's bush?

do you mean like this???

Damn, you mean that's not real? hehe


Seriously, i feel sorry for these people, they are obviously insecure in their own world, it is pitiful

 

[arthur]

Really, I kinda feel sorry for the boys that gotta do that. They are obviously not happy with what they got...but at the end of the day it's the un-photoshopped penis they gotta pull out of their trousers!?!? Think about it??

 

[Indelicate]

When the alterations to the photo are modest, as in the examples in SyddyKitty's gallery, it can be difficult or impossible to detect them. But photo-fakers are rarely content with a modest alteration. What, after all, is the payoff then? They almost always enlarge the penis in the photo (which in many cases is not even their in the first place) to such an extent that the disparity of scale between it and the surrounding skin is visible in the texture.

Yeah, what Cal said.

 

[AlphaMale]

This thread needed to be bumped because there are too many new photo editors popping up here lately.

FYI, you're not fooling anyone by putting up some non edited photos in the midst of all your edited photos.

Real unedited cocks > Fake edited cocks ... Please show the fakers no love!

Have a nice day! :smile:

 

[D_Crystallized Ginger]

This thread needed to be bumped because there are too many new photo editors popping up here lately.

FYI, you're not fooling anyone by putting up some non edited photos in the midst of all your edited photos.

Real unedited cocks > Fake edited cocks ... Please show the fakers no love!

Have a nice day! :smile:

what do you think about street21?? he claims himself real and I think he is... he replied to all my pm where I asked him his measurements and its girth is 22 cm... his widt more than 8 cm!!! that in inches are almost 9 in girth and 3,8 in diameter!!!! I thought the max existing natural girth was something like 8 inches and the max diameter 2,75 inches... Also an italian guy that is an lpsg member too said to me that he saw on cam4 a guy showing similar huge measurements...I'm a bit confused and need to hear more opinions..this thread looks like the right thread for posting my question...

 

[_Jonesy]

Whenever I edit a photo all I do is change contrast/exposure and colour in the normal Microsoft Photo editor thingy. Makes a good difference most of the time. As for editing my penis, I wouldn't even know how :L But if they're insecure I feel sorry for them more than angry. Let them if it makes them feel better.

 

[D_Crystallized Ginger]

I'm not angry at all for example... but I'm only curious if some claimed monsters really exist...

 

[luka82]

I only suck real dicks.

 

[Daisy]

SO true. I love to surf through craigslist for grins & giggles, and the other day I idly clicked on a posting with the requisite cock shot (this was in the miscellaneous romance section, that stuff is funny) and the dude described himself as 8 inches. Let me tell you he was holding it with one hand and the head barely popped out. That is NOT 8 inches. More like 5-ish!

And of course you see that same thing here too.

OMG I do that too! Its fantastic entertainment! I love the 8-9-10" claims. The vast majority are under 6.

 

[Daisy]

By the way Alpha I have a sneaking suspicion your pics are fake, for example this one..I don't know for sure but I think you may have tweaked it a little:

http://i54.tinypic.com/8zraqq.jpg

 

[D_Rosalind Mussell]

Editing photos is fine, but does seem a bit cowardly to post a penis photo that was obviously photochopped to look larger. With that said, I still have to more credit to these guys than the photo thiefs. The thiefs don't seem to have the nerve to even put their own goods on display.