...keep using the word "libtard" when discussing politics. Doing so is sure to accomplish your goal.
...keep using the word "libtard" when discussing politics. Doing so is sure to accomplish your goal.
I feared you were going to suggest we all listen to right wing radio.
Yes, because rePUGnican sounds SO graceful.
Yes, because FAUX News sounds SO sophisticated.
Sklar
Yeah, a fact SilverTrain wasn't chugging along to bring forward, it would seem. At least not enough to include it in his opening post.
You know, the thing with slang is... You can refer to any group of person as you want, the problems come around when you actually refer to a person of that group using your slang term(which happens to be meant derogatorily).
Funny how thin of a line that one is. If you refer to some group of people derogatorily within your social group, it's prejudice, if you do the exact same thing to the person's face, it's discrimination(at this point you are actually treating them differently because of race). If you keep it in your group, in doesn't cause problems; use as much and as bad slang as you want in private, but out in public just have a little respect for the people around you and tone it down, because they're doing the same thing. Being social is all about relaxing boundaries and constraints, that we choose to assign different levels to each boundary just goes to show how we tend to function.
I am so glad you mentioned that. I'm not fond of rePUGnican or Faux news either. Though faux news is accurate, since they tend to make things up and misquote people a lot.]...keep using the word "libtard" when discussing politics. Doing so is sure to accomplish your goal.[/FONT]
Remind me again . . .why is she famous?!?!I would rather listen to Lady Gaga try to sing Carmen.
I hate everyone without fear or favor.
I'm an "equal opportunity" hater. :biggrin1:
Remind me again . . .why is she famous?!?!
No. Obviously not. Are you nevertheless a proponent of the use of the term "libtard"? Or are you just a proponent of juvenile arguments in general, perhaps?
That's what Sklar is saying.I think it goes both ways, Sklar...
So let me see if I understand this.
Your thread title and single sentence is sophisticated and graceful.
Whereas mine, by pointing out what's been said of the right side by detractors, is a juvenile argument.
Instead of actually agreeing with me and saying something like: "Yes, Sklar I agree with you." you instead actually attack my statement by degrading it.
I wonder just how fair and balanced you really are.
Sklar