Posts like this are why I rarely come into this forum.
Considering I made the original insurance analogy, I'm not attempting change any condition of any argument to make any point other than exactly what I said.
You delved into an unneeded lesson on flood vs homeowners insurance in an area irrelevant to the topic at hand. My point is a question of if it's a reasonable expectation of PR based on their current status as a commonwealth. That's it. Because every dollar that goes to a program that our government is NOT obligated to fund is a dollar taken from a program that our government IS obligated to provide.
Why have I not said anything about corporate tax cuts? They're not relevant to this thread. Why have I not said anything about school vouchers? They're not relevant to this thread. Why have I not mentioned all the services that I think should be better funded (mental health, services to seniors, providing adequate resources to our military, meaningful help to our poor, infrastructure maintenance, etc. etc. etc)? Because they're not relevant to this thread.