Q-anon

Tight_N_Juicy

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Posts
18,499
Media
154
Likes
65,280
Points
508
Location
U.S.A.
Verification
View
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Female
There's always room for more false "information" coming from Q followers.

The "information" is never confirmable, never findable to anyone who isn't a follower of the insane theories.. it's always: "look for yourself, don't just believe what people are feeding you". Ok, so by that logic I won't believe any of the bullshit Q followers are trying to shove in my face either.
 

WilliamG

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Cammer
Joined
May 31, 2018
Posts
3,289
Media
40
Likes
12,086
Points
433
Location
Los Angeles, California, US
Verification
View
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
Nope. A lot of false information in there. Do your own research instead of getting fed information
So I feel we are being led on a goose chase... A document was posted that contained extremely plausible facts (or opinions if that serves this better). One of the hallmarks of 'Q speak' is when asked "How do you know celebrities are drinking the blood of babies (or fill in the conspiracy)?" The answer is always "Prove they are not". So in the Q mind... That PDF could be very true, no? And also, when you say "do your own research..." Where do YOU begin? So no MSN, no Twitter, no FB, no 4/8 Chan... Where? The 'dark web'? I only ask as I spend a fair amount of time going down rabbit holes for the truth. Only to find more rabbit holes...
 

Klingsor

Worshipped Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Posts
10,888
Media
4
Likes
11,643
Points
293
Location
Champaign (Illinois, United States)
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
So I feel we are being led on a goose chase... A document was posted that contained extremely plausible facts (or opinions if that serves this better). One of the hallmarks of 'Q speak' is when asked "How do you know celebrities are drinking the blood of babies (or fill in the conspiracy)?" The answer is always "Prove they are not". So in the Q mind... That PDF could be very true, no? And also, when you say "do your own research..." Where do YOU begin? So no MSN, no Twitter, no FB, no 4/8 Chan... Where? The 'dark web'? I only ask as I spend a fair amount of time going down rabbit holes for the truth. Only to find more rabbit holes...

With all of this uncertainty, there's one thing I can hang on to: my absolute trust in BigdongSE.

He wouldn't let us down.
 

dreamer20

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Posts
8,008
Media
3
Likes
25,264
Points
693
Gender
Male
So I feel we are being led on a goose chase... A document was posted that contained extremely plausible facts (or opinions if that serves this better). One of the hallmarks of 'Q speak' is when asked "How do you know celebrities are drinking the blood of babies (or fill in the conspiracy)?" The answer is always "Prove they are not". So in the Q mind... That PDF could be very true, no? And also, when you say "do your own research..." Where do YOU begin? So no MSN, no Twitter, no FB, no 4/8 Chan... Where? The 'dark web'? I only ask as I spend a fair amount of time going down rabbit holes for the truth. Only to find more rabbit holes...

Yes, you've cracked it William. You know what responses to expect after shaking the Q-Anonsense Magic 8-Ball.
 

BigdongSE

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Posts
16,069
Media
269
Likes
90,933
Points
658
Age
29
Location
Västernorrland (Sweden)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
So I feel we are being led on a goose chase... A document was posted that contained extremely plausible facts (or opinions if that serves this better). One of the hallmarks of 'Q speak' is when asked "How do you know celebrities are drinking the blood of babies (or fill in the conspiracy)?" The answer is always "Prove they are not". So in the Q mind... That PDF could be very true, no? And also, when you say "do your own research..." Where do YOU begin? So no MSN, no Twitter, no FB, no 4/8 Chan... Where? The 'dark web'? I only ask as I spend a fair amount of time going down rabbit holes for the truth. Only to find more rabbit holes...
Keywords: Castle Rock, VK, Telegram, Gen Flynn, Powell, David Icke. To name a couple of them
 

WilliamG

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Cammer
Joined
May 31, 2018
Posts
3,289
Media
40
Likes
12,086
Points
433
Location
Los Angeles, California, US
Verification
View
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
Keywords: Castle Rock, VK, Telegram, Gen Flynn, Powell, David Icke. To name a couple of them
This is your response??? Dude... I had four years of keywords: Benghazi, FISA, Deep State... This game of conspiracy charades is way old. I left Facebook for this same "Guess what I'm thinking" bullshit. Show us some verifiable cites. I'm open. Time after time someone would say "this is the evidence!" And then nothing. You know about the boy who cried wolf. Well if there is a wolf then show us. I don't follow people - I follow facts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: b.c. and Calboner

Tight_N_Juicy

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Posts
18,499
Media
154
Likes
65,280
Points
508
Location
U.S.A.
Verification
View
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Female
Yeezh.. I was giving tips, not telling you what to do. Calm down and stop targeting me like you’re a part of some mob

Q followers might want to stop targeting people too.. and participating in *actual* mobs.

(I don't think anyone was "targeting" you, that is a powerful word)
 

gr8gatsby

Mythical Member
Joined
May 2, 2017
Posts
6,616
Media
5
Likes
30,570
Points
233
Location
Sarasota (Florida, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Also... No one is asking for tips. What's being requested is evidence. Hard, verifiable evidence. Period.
There is no evidence, none will be presented. This is all about pot stirring and keeping the mob angry.

So fucking crazy...
 

Calboner

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Posts
9,028
Media
29
Likes
7,893
Points
433
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Nope. A lot of false information in there. Do your own research instead of getting fed information

"Do your own research" is the giveaway slogan of conspiracy fantasists. "Research" here does not mean "an impartial and fair-minded evaluation of evidence," but rather "whatever claims and speculations support a conspiracistic account of events." Thus, peer-reviewed publications by accredited academic specialists (genuine researchers) supported by voluminous citations of publicly available sources, published empirical studies, statistical evidence, and all that sort of thing may be dismissed as "false information," while some bozo's maunderings in a YouTube video are accepted as the secret truth of the matter.

Cass Sunstein had a good term for this way of thinking: "a crippled epistemology." People who embrace it will never be able to walk upright in dealing with reality.

RationalWiki has a good account of the slogan:

"Do your own research!" is a common phrase used by conspiracy theorists and pseudoscience promoters of various creeds in response to people who are skeptical of their claims. This phrase is a form of the escape hatch (Argumentum ad googlam) used by a charlatan who wants to win the argument but does not want to bear the burden of proof. Typically by this, they tend not to be suggesting you actually read through papers in peer-reviewed scientific journals—nah, they're evil, big government shills—nor are they suggesting you conduct original research; Professor Google provides all the info needed. Some specify YouTube is the key to all your "research" (Argumentum ad YouTube).

If you must have recourse to some actual books (how elitist!), stick with the likes of Kevin Trudeau and Alex Jones. It should also be noted that many "research" websites are merely copied from each other, making finding true "original" sources very difficult. Ultimately, the "argument" boils down to "do your own research, from my list of self-approved sources."

Ironically, conducting actual, thorough research from vetted and reliable sources is the best way to debunk conspiracy theories; this goes largely unnoticed by their advocates. It's commonly used when evidence is debunked too, as some people aren't mature enough to admit that they're wrong.[2]
 

b.c.

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
20,540
Media
0
Likes
21,784
Points
468
Location
at home
Verification
View
Gender
Male
There's always room for more false "information" coming from Q followers.

The "information" is never confirmable, never findable to anyone who isn't a follower of the insane theories.. it's always: "look for yourself, don't just believe what people are feeding you". Ok, so by that logic I won't believe any of the bullshit Q followers are trying to shove in my face either.

That's the beauty of bat-shit crazy blown from the arsehole of some psychopath pecking away at the keyboard in mommie's basement... one can conjure up ANYTHING then explain it away by conjuring up even wilder fantasies.

Take this article from today in which it's reported QAnon zealots are allegedly claiming there is no Q, which, as the article later reveals, is just the newest variant of the SAME OLD CON.

Because CRAZY IS AS CRAZY DOES:

QAnon fans now say there is no 'Q' after conspiracy predictions repeatedly flop - Raw Story

After years of disseminating some of the most convoluted, vile, and ever-evolving conspiracy theories to date, some adherents to the QAnon cult are backpedaling, even claiming that "there is no QAnon," VICE News' David Gilbert reports.

But Gilbert writes that this isn't necessarily an example of QAnon believers finally coming to their senses. "...the reality is that surface-level QAnon disavowal is an effort by high-profile influencers to distance the conspiracy theory from the past few months of negative media coverage."

"The idea within the QAnon movement that there is no such thing as QAnon originates from a post from Q, who wrote on October 17 of last year: 'There is Q. There are Anons. There is no QAnon.' 'Q' went on to say that QAnon was something made up by the mainstream media to tarnish the movement," Gilbert writes. '

"Q' conveniently ignored the fact that past 'Q Drops' had referred specifically to QAnon in posts in 2018 and 2019."
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dreamer20

WilliamG

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Cammer
Joined
May 31, 2018
Posts
3,289
Media
40
Likes
12,086
Points
433
Location
Los Angeles, California, US
Verification
View
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
Yeezh.. I was giving tips, not telling you what to do. Calm down and stop targeting me like you’re a part of some mob
Show me some verifiable cites. It's simple. Your "tips" are useless. Like I said, I'm open. I'm not part of 'some mob'. Matter of fact, last it checked the the mob at the Capital had a lot of Q folks there. So please don't project.
 

Calboner

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Posts
9,028
Media
29
Likes
7,893
Points
433
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
There is no limit to the absurdities:

Posted by
u/Substantial_Duck_123
2 days ago
My QDad thinks Joe Biden is actually James Woods or Steve Martin in disguise. Is this normal (for a Q)?
Every day, I think my QDad can't get any crazier, and every day I'm proven wrong. I knew he thought the military had planted a fake Biden, and that the real Biden somehow died in 2019 (and therefore Trump never lost and Biden was never really inaugurated). But I overheard him talking to my semi-QMom saying that he thinks it's either James Woods or Steve Martin working as an actor for this secret military operation. He didn't give any reasoning as to why he thinks it's those actors in particular.

It's just such a ridiculous image. Does he think there's going to come a day where "Biden" pulls off his mask and is like "Hey, it's me, the voice of Hades from fucking Disney's Hercules, here to announce the all the evil pedophiles are defeated!" ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: b.c.
D

deleted3200

Guest
Nope. A lot of false information in there. Do your own research instead of getting fed information


I love this line. "Do your own research" spoken like a true keyboard warrior, armchair expert. Did you interview anyone? Did you leave your house to gather your "research"? Or did you sit at home, like a total loser while you yourself were being "fed"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Calboner