Question For All Those Who Prefer A Circumcised Penis (or Having Glans Always Exposed)...

[Flotiz]

I have a question, probably a bit stupid, for all those who, regardless of their "status", prefer a circumcised penis or in any case the aesthetic aspect of the glans always exposed. I state that I have entered this question in two different sections of the forum because I did not know which was more appropriate. Mine is perhaps more of a kind of curiosity. In fact, I would like to understand if for these people (whether men or women) a circumcised penis is comparable with one that was not circumcised but with the foreskin always retracted. I try to explain myself better. It is obvious that those who are circumcised are different from those who are not. In the first case, the foreskin is eliminated, while in the second it is present. In addition, the removal of the foreskin involves various changes: aesthetic appearance, hygiene, sex, etc. However, I would like to know if those who prefer the circumcised penis find equally "attractive" a penis which, despite still having the foreskin, has a glans always exposed. I'm referring only to the aesthetic aspect. Because logically the other variables cannot be minimally compared between those who are circumcised and those who are not.

The question could also be asked differently. Those who prefer a circumcised penis, prefer it above all for the aesthetic aspect it acquires or, on an equal footing and without a motivation being superior to the others, for everything that involves no longer having the foreskin (i.e. hygiene, new or different sensations during sex etc.) ? In fact, if the first option were true, then an uncircumcised penis that has the foreskin always retracted would also be "attractive". I ask this above all because the only small and possible similarity, albeit quite abstract, could be precisely about the aesthetic aspect (even if it largely depends on the style of circumcision).

I repeat, in conclusion, that I am dwelling only on aesthetics (in reference to the glans which remains exposed) and not on everything that a circumcision entails (for example a change in sensations/sensitivity). I specify this because I would not like someone in the comments to accuse me of not understanding how much difference there is between having a foreskin and not having one.

 

[hantsrob]

I definiely prefer the look of a neatly circumcised penis to one with a foreskin but a bare glans. I dont like the look of the the skin bunched up behind the ridge of the glans. I like to see a neat shaft and I have to admit that the scar is a turn on on as well. Perhaps even better is a cut cock that has been so expertly circumcised that there is no visible scar, just the taught skin of the shaft and the very obvious bulbous head. The circumcised penis wins hands down! I would only modify that opinion for a botched circumcision. Very rare in US but in Europe there are some pretty dreadful examples of circumcision

 

[Flotiz]

I definiely prefer the look of a neatly circumcised penis to one with a foreskin but a bare glans. I dont like the look of the the skin bunched up behind the ridge of the glans. I like to see a neat shaft and I have to admit that the scar is a turn on on as well.

Thank you for writing a very specific comment about your preferences.

 

[cockydude2018]

I agree completely, @rob5712 . I grew up with cut dicks, and uncut cock always seemed exotic to me.

I'd rather that uncut guys (here on the site) showed more of their cocks with foreskin retracted

 

[Flotiz]

I agree completely, @rob5712 . I grew up with cut dicks, and uncut cock always seemed exotic to me.

I'd rather that uncut guys (here on the site) showed more of their cocks with foreskin retracted

Leaving aside that I found the word that you used, i.e. "exotic", quite particular, I must say that, despite being uncircumcised, I prefer aesthetically speaking a glans that is never (entirely) covered.

 

[glansout]

I have always found the exposed glans to be more mature-looking than a covered one. I have known men whose foreskins are naturally retracted, and men who choose to keep their foreskins retracted (with greater or lesser degrees of success), as well as men circumcised for various reasons, and I always prefer them. As to whether retracting is better than circumcision aesthetically, it depends on the amount of foreskin that is rolled back: the less the better. Also, the larger the glans the better, too.

This is a good example of a permanently retracted foreskin.

 

[Tylet]

I cannot understand why if you have a foreskin why you would want to retract it 'unnaturally'.
Nature gave a foreskin for a reason, to protected the head and its rim from 'damage', by rubbing or friction of any kind, to keep it smooth.
My foreskin naturally retracts, or is retracted, as my cock length as I become aroused.
Many of my first time partners who have never seen me 'at rest' have not even been aware that I have a foreskin and when they have they have all been fascinated to see it pull back, exposing the swollen head as I erect.

Pulled back

Natural retraction

 

[Flotiz]

I cannot understand why if you have a foreskin why you would want to retract it 'unnaturally'.
Nature gave a foreskin for a reason, to protected the head and its rim from 'damage', by rubbing or friction of any kind, to keep it smooth.
My foreskin naturally retracts, or is retracted, as my cock length as I become aroused.

I appreciate your contribution and understand your point of view. However, it doesn't have much to do with what I originally asked for. In fact, I asked a very particular question, specifically to all those who prefer a penis with the glans continuously exposed. I wanted to know if they find equally attractive, like a circumcised penis, a penis that is not circumcised but which has the glans always uncovered.

 

[Stu311]

Looking at this from a strictly aesthetic perspective, I find circumcised penises more attractive than penises with retracted foreskins, particularly if the circumcision is tight. The main reason for this is similar to what @rob5712 said earlier: I find that the penis looks neater when there is no skin bunching up behind the glans, which is inevitable for uncircumcised ones (and some loosely circumcised ones too).

Additionally, I prefer the look of taut skin on an erect penis as it gives it a more sculpted, smooth look when there are no moving parts.

Finally, a circumcised penis just looks more consistent me. The glans is always out, free to be seen and has a nice dry and velvety texture to it at all times. With retracted foreskins the skin may slide back at any time and it is not guaranteed to stay in place if you move around. The circumcised man can run about, bend over, jump, stretch etc. and his penis will have a bare glans regardless. For the uncircumcised, unless the foreskin is really short, it will inevitably slide back down over the head.

 

[cufflinks]

For me, an exposed glans usually will do, also when there has been no circumcision. It just gives the penis a far more defined end. In fact, I tend to prefer the looks of low circumcisions with a bit of an acorn ring of skin behind the glans. Mine looks like that, too, and I had it done that way because I like it. There is something natural and sexual about an exposed glans. Circumcision is just a way of ensuring it.

There is also something oddly compelling about a high circumcision, which is a different thing altogether. It seems to imply a certain, coital aggression, reminiscent of what tends to happen when women are guiding the penis into themselves. They just always seem to pull back on the shaft skin like crazy, and a high circ looks like that at all times.

 

[SirConcis]

At teenager, I had not seen a cut guy erect. Seen guys in locker room and playfirl. But I was desperate to have foresjkin that self retracted during erection. And to me, full retraction meant no wrinkles left. So while my circ trim left me about 2/3 to 3/4 covered whens oft, once hard, I had smooth skin on shjaft (though could still be moved up).

It turns out this very look I had desired while not wanting to be circumcised is what made me "circumcised". But it is a desire that I developped while against being cut and just wanting shorter foreskin.

Those who have naturally short foreskin that end up retracted most of the time as adult are lucky. But in the end, when hard, they usually 9not always) have plentty of wrinkles left on shaft.

After I accepted I was cut (to a large part because I was told by a guy who saw me soft/erect and who was, in hindsight loosely cut so the difference with me was not that great) then the presence of the circumcision line started to be important. Seeing where the inner foreskin and shaft skin are attached together and the proportions of glans, inner skin and shaft skin of the average "high" circumcision has become the "standard" for me in how a penis should look when erect.

When soft, seeing a guy with lots of skin at rim gets my curiosity to try to find out if uncut-retracted or cut loose. But in the end, a fill circumision that leaves coronna clear of nunched skin when soft look more manly to me. (and more visible in underwear/bathing suit).

Of the few guys with permanently retracted foreskins, what has surprised me was that none has a "history" behind it, none could tell me when/how it happened or whether they actively trained their foreskin to stay back and it evenually stayed back akk the time, or if it just truly happened on its own (at which point, how, when, did they just get dressed with skin still retracted from boner and it just stayed? did it retract on its own in underwear uring day) etc.

the cosemetic aspect lends to questions to the individual on his status (why he got cut, or why/when/how his foresin is left retracted).

 

[camchain]

Well as you know i am uncut, and i like to keep my foreskin retracted most of the time. I like the feel of it and the look of it to. i also like the look of circumcised penis's and are great to feel and play with as i have played with both uncut and cut.

I like my foreskin and i have the choice of keeping it fully over or pulled right back, the skin when pulled back on my shaft makes it a bit thicker to, so i like both and pleased i have that choice.

 

[cufflinks]

I think retraction is a natural instinct. That's why no one had a history to offer for it. I remember liking how it felt to have the foreskin pulled back and sitting behind the glans. I would have kept it that way, too, but it was simply too long, and always slid forward again. That was then the other comfort zone, of course.

 

[CJF88]

Personally I prefer the look of a circumcised cock, I think it looks far more masculine & attractive.

 

[glansout]

I am an occasional subscriber to a site called First Auditions/The Casting Room, where amateur (so we are told!) guys go for interview for porn movies. A significant number of them have permanently retracted foreskins, usually from choice.

 

[Neverguess]

I personally love the look of a circumcised penis. I love seeing the tip fully with no skin covering it however I can appreciate a beautiful big uncircumcised penis as well! They’re both amazing just a preference

 

[MrTMT]

I had circumcision during winter break of my freshman year in college. So I've experienced with having uncut and cut penis.
My decision to have circumcision back then was fully cosmetic, I like the look of a fully exposed penis head, I thought it's more manly and masculine. Also, back then I was trying to "fit in" with the crowd as I know majority of American males are cut. I was prepare to moving into dormitory when I'm back from winter break during my freshman year. Being circumcised would gave me a confident overall.
Before the circumcision, my foreskin would hang half way over my penis head. It stayed like that even when I had erection.
Looking back, I've not regret my decision on getting cut.

 

[JBrown61]

I'm cut and I've always liked the look of my cut cock. Part of it is having a girthy head, and I just can't imagine it being covered up by something, hard, soft, or semi. I also like the contrast in tones between my cock head and my shaft.

 

[DavidSea]

I’ve tried the whole keep it retracted.
It just causes my pens to get irritated so I don’t bother.
Last time my penis head was temporarily swollen

I only did it to try reduce my sensitivity.

 

[deleted814719]

I was circumcised at birth so of course, I prefer that. I've never had any problems with hygiene and as for pleasuring a cut cock - I don't know anything different.

Just speaking from my own perspective, I think that an uncircumcised soft cock might be strange looking or even ugly to a woman at first glance.