Labor less? No money?
Sound's like a magical place where reality does not operate.
Sorry... we can not get a better world thru less labor.
and, Sorry again, we can not have a civilized world without some medium of exchange for the labor we perform.
You want to live in a world where you make pants, and can not get a needed operation because the surgeon happens to have all the pants he needs for now?
These kind of utopian fantasies all have two things in common... the folks who come up with them utterly ignore human nature, and the folks who support them never think anything all the way thru.
We did not end up with money by accident. It Evolved as the most efficient means of getting work done, and distributing goods and services.
You want a better life? It ALWAYS involves MORE labor.
( try running a farm... if you think the agrarian life is better... its damn hard work )
Lots of thing have been tried... communism results in effort falling to the lowest survivable level. Without incentive, human beings don't perform. period.
Without hunger, you would not get off your ass and make a sandwich.
What we have, right now, is the BEST life has been for humanity, ever.
And we can make it better, still.
But what we have is the result of cultural evolution.
The solution that works best is the solution that thrives.
Don't tell me you are going to thunk up a better solution than that which was the result of ten thousand years of trial and error real world testing.
I think you are wrong as you think i am.
Money is not the product of any acceptance that all methods have been tried and failed leaving us with the best way of living. It is the product of selfishness, greed, laziness and power-craving.
If i need food and you need clothes we can trade but if i need food and you have clothes do you give me the food anyway because i need it or do you insist i give you something else?
Negative human traits propel the existence of money and so sticky is it that nobody can come up with a better way because we are so globally linked. It would take a huge disaster to eliminate the need for money before we could change. What use is money when everyone is fighting for survival?
We are a developed people now, we have more conscience, we have more technology, we have computors. We have the ability to bring about a change which would have to be very gradual using technology to do most of our labour. If it was'nt already in progress then the majority of people would not be working in the service industry instead of agriculture like our ancestors.
With money in our lives we are coming to a snag. What do we do to earn a living when machines are replacing our jobs? We cannot afford to lose our jobs to machines so we end up slowing our development. We even compensate by creating new jobs and 'changing' our moral attitude to accomodate them. Think about the number of people that work legally in the sex industry and how they contribute to the economy, if they were not legally allowed to do so then unemployment rates would be higher.
Where do we work when our traditional jobs are replaced by technological advance? We predominantly worked in agriculture until machines replaced the need for so many so we moved into manufacturing, again machines have replaced the majority and we mostly work in the service industry. What happens when machines take them jobs?
Eventually the realisation will come that people will need to be given free food and free shelter becuase the basics will be about the only thing we will be able to afford in the future. What use is there in creating music or films or holding sporting events when people cannot afford it?
We are not working like our ancestors did Phil, we do not work because we need food (look at how much supermarkets chuck away each day) we are not working to build shelter (only to pay rent and tax on them) instead the only reason we are working is for money itself to buy things which we want not what we need. The sad fact is that many people still cannot afford the things they want because they only earn enough to cover their bills and their food. If the shit hits the fan and people stop spending because they can longer afford anything other than the basics then the economy crumbles and we all suffer from poverty.
The Zeitgeist movement does not suggest to have all the solutions and recognises a change would be slow but it has very real ideas that can improve society. Free basic necessities, Less labour, more equality, less crime.
Anyone who has negative traits such as selfishness, greed, or megalomania will curl their toes at the zeitgeist ideology for obvious reasons.
The only reason we work is for money because that is the status quo not because it is the best way of living. The social degradation that exists in our societies is as a result of living with money. Proof i give you of that is that when a customer is rude or disrespectful to me as an employee i have to bite my tongue or risk losing my job. It is socially irresponsible to allow people to get away with showing no respect simply so that the company you work for can keep their custom.
Money is the root of (almost) all evil, and i believe that.