I think both are correct,
Yes very difficult, unless it was backed by a large drug company that had interests in these areas, even then it would be a one in a million chance of ever being on the team that did the research. Also results that come from tests that are funded by the drug companies, usually will skew in a way that favors the drug company. As a psychology statistician, you can skew numbers to make them read what you want.
Secondly, as you said, most universities/professors would probably see it as a low priority as opposed to health or infrastructure research. You would need to have a professor who already has researched into sexual therapy and chosen it as a career path. There is none at my uni, all the subject matter is very stale.
Im not up on who the "popular" sex therapists are, but maybe a quick look on google scholar will give you an idea. Once you have found an author, look for his/hers other articles that may relate to similar subject matter.
Actually I just did look it up on Google Scholar, which I posted about above.
Out of curiosity, I did a search on research on the subject of perceptions of penis size and most of the ones that popped up first them seem to be done by urologists who are also sex therapists who did training at a psychiatric facility, not psychiatrists or psychologists, which was unexpected. A lot of papers I found were actually published in urology journals, not psychiatric ones.
I take it back, I have found some in some sexual research journals and psychiatric journals on things like coping strategies for men with micropenis and jealousy over feelings of penile inadequacy. The psychological impact of circumcision was in a urology journal.
An amusingly titled one called Penis Greed about penis envy (in women, of course). :biggrin1:
Last edited: