What possible lesson is there for an innocent who, by definition, is innocent? Not a damned thing. A person's life being snuffed out in the most horrible manner even before it has started has a lesson to learn? Pray tell us what that lesson is. I see no justice in such acts.
there isn't any justice in it. i never claimed there was. the lesson exists on a far greater scale than one individual life. we're all learning and teaching with everything we do and say in this world, and everything that is done and said in turn. and while i don't know what happens after we die, i believe that death is not the end. so the lessons we learn, our experiences, our emotions, our fears and loves, are all taken with us.
If the erasure of evil from the world means there would be no compassion, pity, or charity then by all means erase evil for I think any truly compassionate person alive would prefer never to feel those emotions for to feel them means another has to suffer. You're saying that without evil then Christianity has no value so let's be thankful for evil in the world so that our compassion can be tested. Let's rejoice in evil so that we can feel closer to God.
i never mentioned Christianity having value. yes, i am a Christian, but i'm talking about greater ideas than any one particular specific faith. clearly, any compassionate PERSON given the choice and the power would say "yes, do away with all evil and suffering in the world." but one, would they be entirely in the right to do so? because in doing so you prevent conflict, change and growth. you impose your will upon others, even if it is a benevolent will. and second, just because it's what a compassionate person would do does not mean it's what a compassionate God would do. you asked why God allows such things. because allowing us to live freely, make our mistakes and hurt each other is far greater and more beneficial in the long run than forcing us to live, think and act in perfect harmony so that no one ever has to be hurt or unhappy. it may seem perfect on the surface, but at the cost of our ability to think and choose for ourselves? to feel the full spectrum of human emotion and experience? that's too costly to my mind.
Rescuing a person from torture or death at the hands of another is not being overprotective. What greatness does it serve God to allow suffering? What greatness in a deity is served when Bosnian death squads smash the heads of infants against brick walls? Who is God to allow the sacrifice of those children? Was Jesus not enough?
it serves us all to learn and grow. you want God to swoop in and end all war and genocide...but then where does it stop? should He also end all arguments and conflict of any kind? no more accidents with broken arms and scraped knees? no more heartbreak and loneliness? no more hurricanes or disease? you begin to take this idea of God making sure everyone is safe and happy all the time forever and ever to its final conclusion and the world becomes a very sterile and stagnant place.
And love can well exist without evil. We do not need evil to tell us the value of love.
love can exist with out evil. just as light can exist without darkness. but they offer definition, context, understanding. things are given value by their opposites. you can't fully grasp freedom without knowledge and understanding of oppression. you can't truly know how to appreciate joy unless you've also known sorrow. so i would say that we could have love without evil, but we wouldn't understand or appreciate it as much.
So once again the evil triumphs over the innocent and weak. That's fine for a morality class, far different when such examples are made using human lives. God abandoned Jesus on the cross as he abandoned the victims in German gas chambers, in the highlands of Rwanda, and now in Sudan. I daresay everyday somewhere there is a person suffering unspeakable horrors at the hands of another who we may never know about.
that's not what i said at all. i don't believe evil triumphs. i believe that it can inspire incredible strength and nobility, acts of bravery and kindness. God abandons no one. you see suffering and death as this great final indignity that there can be nothing worse than, that to die or suffer means that God has abandoned you. i believe He's there more than ever for you in those times. God isn't Superman. His function isn't to swoop in out of the sky and save everybody's life. because death is not the end. it's just another step in the journey. what lies beyond that step, none of us know. but to believe in God is to believe that there is something beyond this life, beyond this reality. and if you don't believe in God, then it's a moot question anyway because no answer about Him will ever satisfy you.
If my growth comes at the expense of inhuman suffering then fine. I choose to stop growing here and now. I refuse to allow myself to feel better about myself because I'm not out there committing those horrors.
it's not just about that. it's about EVERYTHING in your life. that's just one aspect. you choosing not to acknowledge that isn't going to stop suffering or cruelty in the world, not to use it in yourself not just for feeling better about yourself but to inspire the obvious passion and emotion you feel about that suffering and to direct it towards some greater good, towards helping people or creating or inventing or something, anything, then all it will ever be is just senseless cruelty happening to strangers in another part of the world. it is what YOU do with how you feel about it that gives it any real value in your life.
But who is left to learn a lesson when the person who suffers is dead? Sorry, it just does not wash. Evil things happen to those who stand no lesson to learn, are not witnessed by anyone other than the perpetrator, and serve no higher purpose. By your argument if evil were to cease to happen we, as just men and women, would have to go out and make it happen so we can continue to learn. That's absurd. Peace and goodness do not necessitate violence and evil to exist save that they can be made in comparison. Do we need people to suffocate to remind us that we need oxygen? No. If no one in the world ever suffocated again we'd still know that oxygen was a good and necessary thing.
right, and thus if we saw someone drowning we would know it was necessary and good to rescue them. if we saw someone strangling another person, we would know it is good and necessary to stop them from doing so. i think you're taking my use of the word "lesson" the wrong way...we learn things in life through our experiences. we learn what it is like to feel this, to think that, to do this, to say that. it's not the acquisition of knowledge, but the collection of wisdom. just because someone has died doesn't mean they haven't learned something. hell, they've learned the ultimate answer...what is death and what lies beyond it? someone who commits such atrocities has truly experienced what it is like to take another life, to be cruel, to torture...to be evil. do they continue to be evil, or do they realize what they've done later and repent and try to redeem themselves? and as for witnesses...well, clearly there are. just because we don't see the act itself doesn't mean we don't bear witness to what has happened and learn our own lessons, feel our own emotions, experience it in our own ways. all the suffering you mention, the wars and genocides and such...how could you mention them if you had not heard of them? in this way, you are a witness. you stand as an outraged soul in the face of such travesty, demanding justice and sense out of an unjust and senseless situation. i'm saddened and disheartened by them as well, and stand aghast at how we as fellow human beings can allow such acts to continue and realizing how immense such problems are and how difficult the solutions will be to come by without just making it all worse. i don't hold God responsible because i see these things as the necessary cost of living in a world of free thinking individuals with diverse and varying philosophies and ideologies and traditions. conflict is inevitable, and that conflict will ignite into wars and will lead the strong to impose their will and brutality upon the weak. there will be suffering. there will be pain. there will be death. it is not God's will nor His function to step in and end it all so that we can all just get along. because in order to accomplish that, we would have to live in a perfectly white washed monoculture with no difference in thought or appearance. we would HAVE to. there would be no choice in it. no freedom. and to my mind, that's far more cruel and unjust. the responsibility falls on US to find ways to end suffering, to save lives, to live together. if God just steps in and does it for us, then it has no meaning, no value. we haven't grown or learned at all. we cease being His children and start being His pets.
my two cents. though i doubt there'll ever be an answer to satisfy you. not that that's a bad thing. the fire in your belly and the strength of your convictions will serve you well, my friend.