I think someone already made that joke. Personally, I say he should be on the penny. That's about how much a packet of everyone's favorite "vegetable" costs. (Oh, Bush Jr now classifies salmon raised in a hatchery as "wild" if anyone's interested.)Originally posted by mindseye@Jun 12 2004, 05:34 PM
Considering Reagan's unsympathetic and negligent attitude towards his gay constituency, I can think of no more fitting tribute than to put his picture on the three-dollar bill.
Ack. You're right. My apologies to wlipman.Originally posted by jonb@Jun 12 2004, 09:40 PM
I think someone already made that joke.
Adam Smith was just describing the system; he didn't "invent" it per se, any more than Darwin "invented" natural selection. Smith even recognized the flaws of the capitalist system; he didn't worship it the way neocons do. Ever heard of the "invisible hand"?Originally posted by nlatimer@Jun 12 2004, 07:14 PM
God bless President Regan and eventually maybe we should honor him on our currency. Still Hamilton is almost as important to America's financial institutions as Adam Smith is.
We should give him the quarter, I mean George Washington has the dollar bill, and the 80s was the decade of the quarter because of arcade games, now you have to pump a few of them in or even a dollar to play some games.
Even better though, we should put George Foreman on our money, because if not for him millions of bachelors would go hungry. (I'm just a big fan of the grill)
And I'm sure most people couldn't tell you who is on the ten.
and the 80s was the decade of the quarter because of arcade games
And I'm sure most people couldn't tell you who is on the ten
And that's the problem. Most folks know that Columbus sailed across the Atlantic, but they don't know that he fed the locals to his dogs.I know what he did that made him so great. I don't know ever single one of his shortcommings , so I apologize for only being 4 by the time he was out of office.
Not as much as someone with an SUV. I usually use mass transit, or if it's close enough I walk. (And "close enough" is generally "within fifty miles" for someone who grew up in a rural area.) His claim about trees is demonstrably false; ask any biochemist how much pollution trees cause.And how much pollution do you cause?
LOL The US was always the ones getting the bigger bombs. Hell, even Eisenhower warned about the military getting too cushy with industry.But those who supported a nuclear freeze mostly were communists or supported the communists because we were winning the arms race.
But what are the odds of hitting a bullet with another bullet? Let's try it some time: I chain you to the wall and shoot you, and a third party will try to shoot my bullet. Now, the SDI itself is full of problems: There are no "X-ray lasers" even in laboratories. The cost of keeping these nonexistent lasers prepped for launch would be astronomical, no pun intended.And if you can hit a bullet with another bullet they will deflect. And many of our latest tests of SDI have worked.
You aren't a libertarian; you're a Libertarian with a big L. Changing that one bit, the 32's place, from 1 to 0 makes all the difference. The Libertarian Party has very little in common with little-l libertarians. Just like how Bush is the head of the Republican party but opposes a republican-little-r form of government: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."I'm not a republican either, I'm a libertarian; and I'm sure it was republicans that did it.
Tell that to the utility companies. Besides which, progressive taxation only hurts a small percentage, many of them much like Ken Lay or Martha Stewart. Laissez-faire capitalism's like perpetual motion.Who decides what they can afford? If they earn it they have just as much a right to keep it as anyone else.
But what are the odds of hitting a bullet with another bullet? Let's try it some time: I chain you to the wall and shoot you, and a third party will try to shoot my bullet. Now, the SDI itself is full of problems: There are no "X-ray lasers" even in laboratories. The cost of keeping these nonexistent lasers prepped for launch would be astronomical, no pun intended.
Not as much as someone with an SUV.
You aren't a libertarian; you're a Libertarian with a big L. Changing that one bit, the 32's place, from 1 to 0 makes all the difference. The Libertarian Party has very little in common with little-l libertarians. Just like how Bush is the head of the Republican party but opposes a republican-little-r form of government: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."
And that's the problem. Most folks know that Columbus sailed across the Atlantic, but they don't know that he fed the locals to his dogs.
Oh, and for reference, the Soviet Union collapsed from its own weight; it was already bankrupt from the space race. Crediting him with that is like crediting me for sunlight.
Yeah, a supercomputer can fire a weapon which can't exist within the laws of physics as we know them today. Lovely.If you get a supercomputer to do it, the chances are becoming pretty damn good at this point.
Since I breathe the pollution of the trees, and they breathe my pollution, your point's moot.I meant personally, just just breathing.
No, I was just arguing that the parties no longer posit any ideology that their name would imply. I mean, I've seen the Libertarian platform, and it sounds like it was inspired by the Turner Diaries.So in order to be considered part of a party or any group I have to agree with every stance the party takes. That sounds a little closed minded.
Oh, cross an ocean that people had already crossed five hundred years earlier. Yeah, takes a lot of genius to do that. I'll go put the Mona Lisa on a Xerox machine and call myself an artist.So we should simply disregard all the great things he accomplished.
Wrong again. Any government of that size can't survive. Trotsky predicted the fall of the USSR back before they were our enemies.It was bankrupt from the space race, but it was pushed into downfall by the arms race.
With due respect, maybe you should do a bit more research before choosing your heroes -- instead of letting the media choose them for you.Originally posted by nlatimer@Jun 16 2004, 11:56 PM
I know what he did that made him so great. I don't know ever single one of his shortcommings , so I apologize for only being 4 by the time he was out of office.
With due respect, maybe you should do a bit more research before choosing your heroes -- instead of letting the media choose them for you.