Yeah, I can come up with some off the top of my head: I.Q. > 150, 6'6", mesomorphic, etc.Originally posted by ChimeraTX+Aug 25 2005, 12:13 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ChimeraTX @ Aug 25 2005, 12:13 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Dr Rock@Aug 24 2005, 03:47 PM
it's hardly brain surgery
[post=337670]Quoted post[/post]
given the sheer number of stupid, ugly human beings on the planet, for an 80% cut I would expect even those standards to be unrealistically high.Originally posted by Dr Rock+Aug 25 2005, 04:43 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr Rock @ Aug 25 2005, 04:43 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Originally posted by ChimeraTX@Aug 25 2005, 12:13 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Dr Rock@Aug 24 2005, 03:47 PM
it's hardly brain surgery
[post=337670]Quoted post[/post]
Yeah, I can come up with some off the top of my head: I.Q. > 150, 6'6", mesomorphic, etc.[post=337719]Quoted post[/post]
One-hundred is probably more realistic. I still want everyone to be tall and muscular though.Originally posted by ChimeraTX+Aug 25 2005, 03:05 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ChimeraTX @ Aug 25 2005, 03:05 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-robertomuro@Aug 24 2005, 09:55 PM
Agreed. That IQ alone will give you just 0.1% of the population.
[post=337758]Quoted post[/post]
you're some kind of weird closet-case or something. there are actually plenty of applicable advantages to shorter, more compact bodies: better power-to-weight ratio, reduced mass and surface area (very useful for flying fighter jets, among other things), and basic ability to get into places us larger folks can't. after all, our direct evolutionary ancestors actually became SMALLER because it suited them better - smaller people could conceal themselves more effectively, climb with greater agility, and so on. it wasn't until the onset of the tertiary ice ages and the obvious climatic incentives that we started growing over 4 foot high in the first place. pathological predispositions aside, I don't think physiology is a valid criterion at this point.Originally posted by Dr Rock+Aug 25 2005, 02:49 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr Rock @ Aug 25 2005, 02:49 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Originally posted by ChimeraTX@Aug 25 2005, 03:05 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-robertomuro@Aug 24 2005, 09:55 PM
Agreed. That IQ alone will give you just 0.1% of the population.
[post=337758]Quoted post[/post]
One-hundred is probably more realistic. I still want everyone to be tall and muscular though.
[post=337759]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by madame_zora@Aug 25 2005, 04:27 PM
Dr. Rock, you make me hot when you talk evolution.
[post=337954]Quoted post[/post]
wanna propagate our superior dna?Originally posted by Dr Rock+Aug 25 2005, 11:18 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr Rock @ Aug 25 2005, 11:18 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-madame_zora@Aug 25 2005, 10:27 PM
Dr. Rock, you make me hot when you talk evolution.[post=337954]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by ORCABOMBER@Aug 26 2005, 11:31 AM
Propogate DNA? Meh, cloning and gene splicing are suitable methods. Wait, Zora coming to the UK? YAY!
[post=338138]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by madame_zora+Aug 25 2005, 07:15 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(madame_zora @ Aug 25 2005, 07:15 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Originally posted by Dr Rock@Aug 25 2005, 11:18 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-madame_zora@Aug 25 2005, 10:27 PM
Dr. Rock, you make me hot when you talk evolution.[post=337954]Quoted post[/post]
wanna propagate our superior dna?
[post=337973]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by KinkGuy+Aug 26 2005, 08:05 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(KinkGuy @ Aug 26 2005, 08:05 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Originally posted by madame_zora@Aug 25 2005, 07:15 PM
Originally posted by Dr Rock@Aug 25 2005, 11:18 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-madame_zora@Aug 25 2005, 10:27 PM
Dr. Rock, you make me hot when you talk evolution.[post=337954]Quoted post[/post]
wanna propagate our superior dna?
[post=337973]Quoted post[/post]
My lucky fucking day! *rapidly books flight for the UK, packing light as clothing won't be needed. Proclaims passionately "God as my witness, I'll never go hungry again!"*
Sorry Kink, this post was for ME!!
[post=338029]Quoted post[/post]
China wants the Us for two reasons. Once, our land is the most plentiful. Now at 300 million, I am sure it has the capiacity to support many more. Most of Russua north of China is Siberia, a land that won't support that many more people.Originally posted by Freddie53+Aug 23 2005, 03:02 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Freddie53 @ Aug 23 2005, 03:02 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Steve26@Aug 22 2005, 01:55 PM
Erm ... it might be scary if it were at least slightly plausible. Dontcha think that if the Chinese wanted more "living space" they might consider invading their immediate neighbor to the north, which has three times the land mass of the US and a military that can't even rescue its own sailors from downed submarines??
Steve
[post=337298]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Shamrock@Aug 27 2005, 08:19 AM
I am so sick of popular conspiracy theories. Think for yourselves people, don't buy prepackaged concepts. Maybe oil is a factor, but its not the only reason for iraq. Oil is running out anyway and starting a whole war over what iraq just has isn't worth the time, bullshit and expense you have to go through, There are other factors
[post=338413]Quoted post[/post]
if you're a politician, it's a no-brainer - you're spending money that isn't yours, on a highly visible campaign which will distract the majority of people from the fucking mess you're making of your own countries. it's a win-win situation for them.Originally posted by Shamrock@Aug 27 2005, 08:19 AM
starting a whole war over what iraq just has isn't worth the time, bullshit and expense you have to go through[post=338413]Quoted post[/post]