If any of you clowns had read ORIGIN OF SPECIES you would know that Darwin was kind of mystical and thought that there was an overall shape to evolution (intelligent design).
His collaborator Wallace at that point was not, but later became someone who fell heavily under the spell of mediums and spiritualism.
Darwin probably wished there was evidence of intelligent design, because he was somewhat religious when he began working on his theory. In fact, while in university, his natural science textbook was the greatly revered
Natural Theology; or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity.
Darwin referred to this book many times which is not a surprise because it was the classic natural science text from 1802 up to the period when Darwin was using it in college. In this book, Wm Paley, Christian apologist and philosopher, lays out his argument for Intelligent Design with the God of Abraham being the designer. Darwin referred to it in his autobiography and said that initially he was convinced of Paley's argument.
However, what Darwin ultimately ended up with was a theory about the diversity of life on the planet that did not require a designer. This is why he worked for decades before publishing it, collecting enough evidence that to make it a slam dunk. What Darwin was clearly proposing was a third explanation for the diversity of life. The first two being random chance and design. He was also very clear that he saw nothing teleological about evolution (meaning that evolution is simply opportunistic and is not working to perfect a species or create a succession of species towards some goal.)
But yes, the theory of Intelligent Design is about 200 years old, and over that period of time, there has been nothing new added to the theory and there has never been any evidence to support it. Where some 400 papers per month on evolution related papers are published in professional journals per month, there are no papers published related to design.
The problem with these polls is that they frame the question so as to make evolution and the concept of God mutually exclusive. Based on how those polls are worder, If you beleive in evolution then you must reject ANY role for God. And the opposite is true. If you believe in God in any way, then you must comepletely reject evolution. I'm not sure there isn't room for true sceince and God.
Yes, that is the problem with those polls. They set up a false mutually exclusive dichotomy that only is valid for fundamentalists, which represent a small minority of Christians.
In fact, the results are inconsistent with the doctrines of a cross section of Christian denominations. Those mainstream denominations that formally embrace science and accept the Theory of Evolution account for about 1.8 billion out of 2 billion Christians worldwide.
However, I don't blame the inconsistency completely on the wording of the poll. If you interviewed the members of any given mainstream Christian congregation in the USA with much better wording, you would find most of them unaware of the position their denomination takes on the subject and you would find over 50% of them doubting evolution because they think it conflicts with their faith.
I hold the public school system, the scientific community in general, and the mainstream denominations reponsible for this tragedy of ignorance.
Happy Birthday Charles D.