Now see this is what gets me about all these reports. There is always an average of these numbers taken from a certain amount of men measured, but where are they getting the test subjects? Now I'm not saying one part of the country has men with bigger penises than others, or that other races are bigger than others because I grew up in the south (things are grown bigger in the south, I've heard it before) and there were Caucasians that were just as big as African Americans where I grew up. And I'm talking about 8 inches plus being the norm. Just in my family alone, with a it being a mixed race family, the range went from just above 8 in to well over 10 in. Now to someone who is used to seeing this size in the school showers, "swimming holes"(remember I'm from the south), and things such as that, these reports seem odd to me and I would normally think they were off. When I got in the military, I saw a wide range of sizes from what I was used to seeing to much smaller to much larger. Rarer of the much larger but more around the 7 to 8 inch mark. Finally settling down in my current location, again I am faced with the much larger versions of the penise. My female friends say that I am huge and I still have it set in my mind that I'm not because of what I have seen. So when there are so many different sizes from so many different people out there, how is it truely possible to get an accurate account in these reports such as the Kinsey report? It falls back to where are they getting their subjects from? What area? Because in my oppinion, the military has the largest diversity of men. Men from all across the nation.