Report: Big Cock Statistics!

B_andyo

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Posts
1,928
Media
0
Likes
39
Points
183
Location
Miami
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male

stratedude

Legendary Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Jun 28, 2007
Posts
2,383
Media
16
Likes
1,076
Points
583
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
For the stats from the Alfred C. Kinsey Institute for white college men, in quarter-inch lengths, measured top side from tip to body, see this site.

It suggests that 2.9 percent have a 7.5 inch penis.
1 percent have an 8.0 inch penis.
0.1 percent have a 9.0 inch penis.

Andyo seems pretty much spot on, FWIW.
Well first of all he doesn't say what his sample size was, but I can tell you by looking at his graph that his sample size is obviously too small. I mean if we were to read his results literally instead of mathematically, you would think that almost twice as many people have a 7" cock than a 6.75" cock. I mean, that IS what his results say. The truth is that the page shows an incomplete study. There should be enough data there to fit a curve to it so that we can makes some general assumptions (like for example that there should be more people with a 6.75" cock than 7").

Also, if his average is correct, I must question his measuring methods because he states at the bottom that other studies have shown smaller numbers. There has to be a reason for that.

My 'guesses' were loosely based on the graph at wikipedia found here. Actually now that I am looking at it, it looks like anyone with more than 7" is in the top 5% range. HOWEVER, you can see by this graph that 8" and above is close to the top 1% and there are virtually no penises above 9". And it looks like the sample size here is too small also, but it is hard to tell.
 

D_Gunther Snotpole

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Posts
13,632
Media
0
Likes
73
Points
193
I agree that you wouldn't want to put a lot of weight on those Kinsey figures. (I wonder if you saw the edit I made.)

Interestingly, as you note, the Kinsey figures and the Wikipedia figures actually seem rather similar, especially for 8" and 9":

Actually now that I am looking at it, it looks like anyone with more than 7" is in the top 5% range. HOWEVER, you can see by this graph that 8" and above is close to the top 1% and there are virtually no penises above 9". And it looks like the sample size here is too small also, but it is hard to tell.
 

9incut

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Posts
506
Media
0
Likes
184
Points
103
Location
Maryland
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Now see this is what gets me about all these reports. There is always an average of these numbers taken from a certain amount of men measured, but where are they getting the test subjects? Now I'm not saying one part of the country has men with bigger penises than others, or that other races are bigger than others because I grew up in the south (things are grown bigger in the south, I've heard it before) and there were Caucasians that were just as big as African Americans where I grew up. And I'm talking about 8 inches plus being the norm. Just in my family alone, with a it being a mixed race family, the range went from just above 8 in to well over 10 in. Now to someone who is used to seeing this size in the school showers, "swimming holes"(remember I'm from the south), and things such as that, these reports seem odd to me and I would normally think they were off. When I got in the military, I saw a wide range of sizes from what I was used to seeing to much smaller to much larger. Rarer of the much larger but more around the 7 to 8 inch mark. Finally settling down in my current location, again I am faced with the much larger versions of the penise. My female friends say that I am huge and I still have it set in my mind that I'm not because of what I have seen. So when there are so many different sizes from so many different people out there, how is it truely possible to get an accurate account in these reports such as the Kinsey report? It falls back to where are they getting their subjects from? What area? Because in my oppinion, the military has the largest diversity of men. Men from all across the nation.
 

bigbull29

Worshipped Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
7,577
Media
52
Likes
14,090
Points
343
Location
State College (Pennsylvania, United States)
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
There's something out there got "big girth", which is much more elusive than big length. How many men have a penis whose girth is 7+ ?

Who out there has a fucker like King Phallucus?:biggrin1: Millions, thousands, hundreds, a handfull, or ...?...:tongue:


Combien d'hommes ont un pénis dont sa circonférence mesure au moins 7 pouces?
 

9incut

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Posts
506
Media
0
Likes
184
Points
103
Location
Maryland
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
There's something out there got "big girth", which is much more elusive than big length. How many men have a penis whose girth is 7+ ?

Who out there has a fucker like King Phallucus?:biggrin1: Millions, thousands, hundreds, a handfull, or ...?...:tongue:


Combien d'hommes ont un pénis dont sa circonférence mesure au moins 7 pouces?

My partner is 7 1/2 in girth, and I love it!
 

B_ScaredLittleBoy

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Posts
3,235
Media
0
Likes
19
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
It's pretty daunting that you're so childishly gullible.

:rolleyes:

Agreed.

Regarding the topic: there maybe 300 million people in America but how many are mature adult males? If you say 25% then 1% of 25% of the population is quite a small number.

I think the old numbers someone came up with a while ago were that 1/10 people would be ~6"-7" and 1/100 would be 8" plus. Seems about right?

Not sure on the frequencies for girth but I'd imagine them to be similarly rare.
 

widenine

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Posts
380
Media
4
Likes
16
Points
103
Why All this talk about the average size of a dick. And really who cares if it's average when your prospective partner probably wants eight and above versus 6. (You will know this after being with them for less then six months.... even if they deny it.) :(

"But my dick is average :)" It's like the average-sized penis carrier is saying: "I know I'm two inches or more less than you desire, but given the general population, and my other attributes, it could be worse. Would you please settle for what I have?"

And that's not a bad argument. It's genuine if not humbling. But please.
If that partner's true desire, overall attributes being excellent, is to be with a great man who has his or her idea of a big piece of meat, they will always feel a need for that big piece of meat. I bet this is more common with the guys....who probably will stay with that main course and find that big meat on the side.

What do you think?
 

saabman

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Posts
254
Media
0
Likes
44
Points
163
Location
Connecticut
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
Well, I didn't do no scientific study, I just work out alot, swim in the town pools, and play alot of sports - so I see alot of dick in the locker room - and I know that younger dudes like me are totally more hung than my older bro's or my dad's generations. Bigger hands, bigger feet, bigger dicks. Nobody can tell me different. I've seen it.
 

canadajf

Just Browsing
Joined
Jan 2, 2008
Posts
11
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
86
Location
Japan
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Stratedude: everything you say is true about Gaussian distribution (of course can we argue on the actual mean and variance)... but how can this apply to a site, such as LPSG, which uses the internet to attract big dude?

It you apply the same argument to Harvard University Physics department, you could conclude that it is impossible that they really have 8 Nobel Laureates (I do not know the actual number)... but neither Harvard nor LPSG is a random selection. It seeks abnormal dudes either intellectually (Harvard) or penis wise (LPSG)....

Or another example would be a clinic for penile reduction: of course everyone over there would be way off the mean of the bell curve in girth or length!!!

Cheers!
 

B_andyo

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Posts
1,928
Media
0
Likes
39
Points
183
Location
Miami
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
plain and simple if you got both over 8 and 6 inch girth you are ( 1 in 1000! ) :)

But over 8 inches lenght (1- 60?) just taking a guess of what I think.

Less than 8 length but over 6 girth (1-95)

now 8.5 L x 6+ girth = 1-5000

8.5x6.5 = 1-10000

9x6=1-20000

9x6.5=25000

10x7=150,000 lol

just having fun here...

14" penises = 6 in the world.

15" = extinct
 
3

3151

Guest
Did some math recently...assuming that the biggest cocks are in the top 1 % of all cock sizes then that means there are 3 million huge cocks in America - because there are about 300 million people in America.

YOUR NUMBER = 3 Million

Now add census data:

24.7% are under 18, leaving 75.3% 18+.
Assuming we're not talking about those who are underage, that cuts gross population to 225.9 million

50.7% are women, leaving 49.3% MALE = Gross male population over 18 is 111.4 million.

1% of 111.4 million = 1,114,000 million "huge."
 

B_superlarge

Experimental Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Posts
912
Media
0
Likes
10
Points
163
Something everyone is leaving out of their guesstimates. One has to go beyond the chart in order to keep it real. Sizesurvey ran a poll of over 3100 guys and the results indicate that (in general) guys with above average and big dicks have twice as many partners. What that means, for example, is that if you produce a reliable chart which indicates 2% of guys are 8" and longer, the reality for women (in general) is that 4% of guys are 8" or longer when one takes into consideration the size survey poll result. If one applies the same to 6" girth then that's a 4% chance of meeting a guy with 6" girth or more. Combining length and girth it's an 8% chance of her meeting either a 6>" girth, or a 8>" length. In other words, if she sleeps with 12 guys her chance of getting thick dicked or long dicked is near 100%. If she sleeps with 6 guys her chances are about 50%. Also, since my study has determined that there is strong correlation between length and girth her chances of getting big AND long dicked are actually higher than the percentages would seem to indicate. In other words, if she sleeps with 12 guys not only are her chances of getting long or thick dicked near 100%, but her chances of one of those guys having both are better than one might think (I would have to find my chart in order to say the odds on this. I'll look it up if anyone is interested). If we take it down to above average sizes of 7" length or 5.5" girth it should by now be quite evident just how easy it is for women to run into guys packing one or the other or both. If she has been with at least a few guys, then guys with average size length and girth need not waste time asking her if she has had bigger.
 

stratedude

Legendary Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Jun 28, 2007
Posts
2,383
Media
16
Likes
1,076
Points
583
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Stratedude: everything you say is true about Gaussian distribution (of course can we argue on the actual mean and variance)... but how can this apply to a site, such as LPSG, which uses the internet to attract big dude?

It you apply the same argument to Harvard University Physics department, you could conclude that it is impossible that they really have 8 Nobel Laureates (I do not know the actual number)... but neither Harvard nor LPSG is a random selection. It seeks abnormal dudes either intellectually (Harvard) or penis wise (LPSG)....

Or another example would be a clinic for penile reduction: of course everyone over there would be way off the mean of the bell curve in girth or length!!!

Cheers!
Sorry to ruin your arguement, but I agree with everything you say. We weren't talking about a penis sizes based on a sample of only LPSG members, we were talking about a good sample of ALL adult males.

Yes, if you are only yalking about LPSG members then maybe 15% are above 7" etc.
 

stratedude

Legendary Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Jun 28, 2007
Posts
2,383
Media
16
Likes
1,076
Points
583
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Something everyone is leaving out of their guesstimates. One has to go beyond the chart in order to keep it real. Sizesurvey ran a poll of over 3100 guys and the results indicate that (in general) guys with above average and big dicks have twice as many partners. What that means, for example, is that if you produce a reliable chart which indicates 2% of guys are 8" and longer, the reality for women (in general) is that 4% of guys are 8" or longer when one takes into consideration the size survey poll result. If one applies the same to 6" girth then that's a 4% chance of meeting a guy with 6" girth or more. Combining length and girth it's an 8% chance of her meeting either a 6>" girth, or a 8>" length. In other words, if she sleeps with 12 guys her chance of getting thick dicked or long dicked is near 100%. If she sleeps with 6 guys her chances are about 50%. Also, since my study has determined that there is strong correlation between length and girth her chances of getting big AND long dicked are actually higher than the percentages would seem to indicate. In other words, if she sleeps with 12 guys not only are her chances of getting long or thick dicked near 100%, but her chances of one of those guys having both are better than one might think (I would have to find my chart in order to say the odds on this. I'll look it up if anyone is interested). If we take it down to above average sizes of 7" length or 5.5" girth it should by now be quite evident just how easy it is for women to run into guys packing one or the other or both. If she has been with at least a few guys, then guys with average size length and girth need not waste time asking her if she has had bigger.
VERY GOOD OBSERVATION! I never really thought of it that way but I would have to say that based on my real-world observation and experience, you are 100% correct.
 

B_superlarge

Experimental Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Posts
912
Media
0
Likes
10
Points
163
Thanks stratedude. I was inaccurate though. That's bound to happen when one is trying to speak of one woman but in a general sense. In my example in which a woman sleeps with 12 guys, someone could say that since the pool of guys to pick from is filled with tons of guys, everytime she met a guy her chance would only be about 8%. While that is true, if one has 12 chances then she is very probably going to 'get lucky'. Of course, in only 12 she might not meet any that big (8>" length or 6>"), but on the other hand she could meet two. Meeting one is the most likely chance, but none or two can happen. Her chance percentage is actually controlled to a large extent by the luck factor (error margin) in such a small sampling. The near 100% chance isn't actually quite accurate, but at least one gets the idea. Her chances are good. I'm rusty when it comes to formulas, but obviously a formula can be applied in order to accurately realise her chance of 0 or 1 or 2 (or more) encounter(s) that size out of 12 random guys.
When it comes to 7" length or 5.5" girth then obviously her chances quickly become strong early on in her encounters.