Did you think I wouldn't read the article?
The article is criticizing women, feminists, and other "liberals" or sjws for NOT REALIZING they shouldn't be into penis size shaming, BUT ARE!
Of course opposing penis size shaming SHOULD BE a corollary of feminism because the phallocracy treats small dick guys as less masculine and more feminine, tending to put them in the same "inferior" category as women, but not as pretty!
Ah but was i right? The general theme of this thread is that there is no opposition to penis size shaming from women and liberals in general.
If, i were to say there are no human beings out there who have two eyes. How many would you need to present to prove i'm wrong? That's right. One. And only one.
Again. The general theme is that no one is against penis size shaming. And my comment was only that there are feminists against penis size shaming. Did i or did i not just prove exactly that?
Guys with small penises are not the major factor in shaming women. That seems to be your assumption. Look toward the more arrogant.
No. That is not my assumption. All i said was that body shaming against women is much more prevalent than penis size shaming. I didn't say anything toward men being the major factor. I did say though that men with small or smaller refusing to help the fight against body shaming harm themselves in both the short and the long run because penis size shaming isn't as wide spread as body shaming.
And that body shaming is the gateway drug to stopping penis size shaming. That if men with small or smaller were to only be against penis size shaming while ignoring the much larger issue of body shaming they would be harming big time their chances of people respecting them. Which would lead to penis size shaming sticking around longer.
There's a difference between being arrogant and being right.