Madonna's comment is perfectly legitimate (de gustibus non disputandum est).
The thing is that such comment automatically delivers a degrading message that from Madonna's perspective men with small penises are unworthy of passing their genes to the next generation - because sexual rejection means exactly that.
This is an ultimate degradation to any human being.
"You are not worthy of procreation because you have been born wrong".
Still, even such opinion is perfectly legitimate.
Madonna has such specific opinion and chooses her partners accordingly and some other women might have a different one.
The real problem starts here:
Some (not all fortunately) women feel happiness and joy if certain men with certain genetic predispositions are publicly degraded and humiliated by indirectly declaring that they are not worthy of procreation.
Can anything display better such women's complexes and distorted man hating psyche than that?
De gustibus non est disputandum - Wikipedia
De gustibus non est disputandum, or de gustibus non disputandum est, is a Latin maxim meaning "In matters of taste, there can be no disputes" (literally "about tastes, it should not be disputed/discussed").[1][2] The phrase is commonly rendered in English as "There is no accounting for taste(s)."[3] The implication is that everyone's personal preferences are merely subjective opinions that cannot be right or wrong, so they should never be argued about as if they were. Sometimes the phrase is expanded as De gustibus et coloribus... referring to tastes and colors.
Yeah, no one so far is arguing that what she said is not true, though she might be lying and "posing", ie. bragging. She might think she lionizes herself by claiming to be a size queen, whether she is or not.
Most likely, I'm still convinced, she thinks turnabout is fair play in reacting to the beauty demands of the male collective on the female collective.
Using the phrase "perfectly legitimate", seems to me out of place in defending what she said. What in the world does "legitimate" have to do with such speech? Perfect no less?
Yes, men do this to women too, but not in a public venue, at least not often in the current era because of feminist and "decency" push back: the word "skank" comes to mind. I've never heard that kind of talk in public performances, but I don't listen to much to the worst stand-up, rap, etc.
Yes, I've heard men by implication categorize in their neanderthal peer groups specific women as not fit for sex or reproduction. Actually, I've never heard any do it on the basis of the defects of a single organ, but they probably have. It was only an happenstance to be around such a group. I wasn't a "member" as they discriminate against "small members."
In my mind, the point is that there is no or very little push back for publicly demeaning men with small penises while there is push back nowadays for speech that is hurtful to most other groups. I don't even want to limit her free speech. Mostly, I'm disappointed by the enthusiastic response of the audience and critic.
BTW: Contrary to the above, Madonna's message was dismissive and purposely hurtful, but not necessarily hateful. Apparently, women of her mentality found her "comments worth the price of admission." On the other hand, some women seem to "hate" that they are bothered by a small penis and are "pressured" to pretend the small dick is OK.
