As specified in the title, I wanted to re-propose a sort of survey about the degree of coverage of the glans when the penis is not erect. I made this decision because, unlike my previous polls, in this case I also included the circumcised. Especially for a particular reason. In fact, I am not only asking you what your glans degree of coverage is usually, but also which option (among those listed) you think is more widespread and also which one is aesthetically preferable. Summarizing the three questions are:
1) When the penis is flaccid, what is the degree of glans coverage ?
2) When the penis is flaccid, what do you think is usually the most common degree of glans coverage (among the uncircumcised)?
3) Regardless of your "status" (therefore the opinion of the circumcised would also be interesting), aesthetically speaking, what degree of glans coverage do you think is better to have or would you have preferred to have?
To answer the first question, you can also select an option from the survey you find above. For the other two, leave a comment.
Logically, to facilitate the answers I have prepared some options with the related explanatory photos attached:
A) Glans totally covered with long foreskin extending far beyond;
B) Glans totally covered by the foreskin without going further;
C) Glans almost entirely covered by the foreskin: a small part remains visible (usually near the urinary meatus);
D) Glans only partially covered by the foreskin: the tip of the glans is uncovered;
E) Glans only partially covered by the foreskin: it is only half covered;
F) Glans almost entirely uncovered with the foreskin covering it only minimally, for example 1/3;
G) Glans always uncovered with foreskin which remains fully retracted;
H) Glans always uncovered with absence of the foreskin: circumcision;
1) When the penis is flaccid, what is the degree of glans coverage ?
2) When the penis is flaccid, what do you think is usually the most common degree of glans coverage (among the uncircumcised)?
3) Regardless of your "status" (therefore the opinion of the circumcised would also be interesting), aesthetically speaking, what degree of glans coverage do you think is better to have or would you have preferred to have?
To answer the first question, you can also select an option from the survey you find above. For the other two, leave a comment.
Logically, to facilitate the answers I have prepared some options with the related explanatory photos attached:
A) Glans totally covered with long foreskin extending far beyond;
B) Glans totally covered by the foreskin without going further;
C) Glans almost entirely covered by the foreskin: a small part remains visible (usually near the urinary meatus);
D) Glans only partially covered by the foreskin: the tip of the glans is uncovered;
E) Glans only partially covered by the foreskin: it is only half covered;
F) Glans almost entirely uncovered with the foreskin covering it only minimally, for example 1/3;
G) Glans always uncovered with foreskin which remains fully retracted;
H) Glans always uncovered with absence of the foreskin: circumcision;