Reversing Circumcision

ajay38

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Posts
46
Media
8
Likes
5
Points
228
Location
Maryland, DC
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Years ago out a sense of frustration over being circumcised (I have a passion for uncut dick). I decided to stretch my foreskin using a method I found on the internet with rubber O rings and medical tape and small weights. In a few weeks I was able to extend my foreskin enuff to realize that it works. However I knew I was never going to get back that sensitivity and feeling that an uncut guy has and gave it up. Anyone out there done the same thing and how successful were you?
 

ManiacalMadMan

Experimental Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Posts
1,073
Media
0
Likes
21
Points
183
Age
68
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I was with a fellow for a while who had done the reinvention of a foreskin thing a few years before I met him Like you he said the sensitivity thing just was not happening which made him a little sad at times although he got a new feel on his main shaft what with that handsome skin shifting around on it. He said the bigger thrill for him was the appearance he just prefered it.
 

Ed69

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2006
Posts
2,890
Media
0
Likes
1,279
Points
258
Location
Oregon (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I'm still in the process of restoring my foreskin.The longer it stays covered the more sensitive the head gets.I'm trying for a quarter inch overhang so it stays covered all the time.
 

B_dxjnorto

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Posts
6,876
Media
0
Likes
206
Points
193
Location
Southwest U.S.
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
It's super slow, but it is working for me. It could never go back to having my sensitive parts chafing in underclothing. Because of restoration I'll never have to. I am covered all the time as long as I wear form fitting underwear (boxer briefs), but since the closure is destroyed, all season coverage is elusive. All you can do is keep on tugging for more length.

Your mileage may vary. Many factors are involved--how much the good "doc" removed, size and length, grower vs. shower, glans size and shape, hereditary factors such as how elastic your skin is and how much tension it takes to encourage cells division. Also, foreskin is not just skin. There are underlying layers of smooth muscle and fascia that are necessarily resistant to expansion.

All things considered, I'm pretty sure big guys lose more to the knife than average or small guys. Like an Army haircut, everyone ends up the same. The circumciser has no possible way of gauging a man's adult dimensions.

The benefits are worth the hassle. Once the skin starts to slide it begins to function more as nature intended. The circumciser did me real tight. I was almost anorgasmic before restoration.

Keep On Tugging.
 

Mumzi

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Posts
469
Media
0
Likes
23
Points
163
Location
Calif
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
dxjnorto said:
The circumciser did me real tight. I was almost anorgasmic before restoration.

Keep On Tugging.

This is really sad. I know some men are fine with circumcision, but some are not. A while back there was another thread with a link to a site about reversing circumcision. I read quite a bit of it.
There are a lot more men having problems with lack of sensation than people realize.
Few talk about the circumcised men who are dealing with lack of sensitivity.
I'm sure it is blamed on all kinds of things.

Who is going to tell a man "maybe you need a foreskin". But I'm hearing a lot of men who did restore say they have more sensitivity.
I guess there are no stats to prove one way or the other, but it's still unfortunate.
 

B_dxjnorto

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Posts
6,876
Media
0
Likes
206
Points
193
Location
Southwest U.S.
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
Mumzi said:
I know some men are fine with circumcision, but some are not.
Mumzi, in circumcising cultures, including the U.S., you better be fine with it or risk ostracization. If you go against culture, people think you are the problem. Few people within the culture seem willing to evaluate cultural practices as to whether they are mentally healthy or not.
 

Mumzi

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Posts
469
Media
0
Likes
23
Points
163
Location
Calif
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
In the US the numbers are going down, but it is slow. I don't think a lot of it is cultural, it seems most is just because. Just because dad is, just because it is cleaner (no), just because everyone else is.


This is a difficult subject because when you try to let people know that INFANT circumcision is just wrong, the men who are circumcised often feel we are inferring they are inferior. That is just not the case.
It would make no difference to me if my husband were circumcised. I had no idea he was not when I met him.


But the fact that men are having problems with sensation, and the fact that many report better sensation after restoring ( I don't know the numbers) does suggest that the foreskin can be beneficial.

The bottom line is: we need to stop doing INFANT circumcision. In the past parents did what they were told was best for their child. But we know more now and it is not best for the child. That child will become a man and when he does he may choose to have it removed. Or he may choose not to have it removed. But to take away that choice, especially in this day and age of information at our finger tips, makes no sense.

Those men who are restoring or who are experiencing lack of sensation need to be as vocal as they can. People need to know that this surgery MAY cause problems in the future, and it makes sense to leave the foreskin alone.
We often have the laundry list of reasons we SHOULD circumcise, and now we need the same of why we should NOT.


Let men choose. It is their body, they should have that right.
 

Cut1

1st Like
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Posts
16
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
146
Location
I am no longer a member at L.P.S.G
Sexuality
No Response
Why do you guys want to have a foreskin? It may be true that uncircumcised guys have more feeling, but will you last as long in bed? What about cleanliness and diseases. I was circumcised right after I was born and am glad not to have any foreskin:smile: . I am just curious of why you would want to create another one on a perfectly normal penis. Is it for looks or something:rolleyes: .
 

Mumzi

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Posts
469
Media
0
Likes
23
Points
163
Location
Calif
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Cut1 said:
Why do you guys want to have a foreskin? It may be true that uncircumcised guys have more feeling, but will you last as long in bed? What about cleanliness and diseases. I was circumcised right after I was born and am glad not to have any foreskin:smile: . I am just curious of why you would want to create another one on a perfectly normal penis . Is it for looks or something:rolleyes: .

I guess I'm wondering if you have been with a guy who is not circumcised.
If you have, I don't know that you'd ask that question. Looks has little to do with it. Function is key.
I'm going to let one of the men answer this. Someone who own's a foreskin could probably give you a better answer.
 

chico8

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Posts
727
Media
0
Likes
21
Points
163
Location
Chico
Sexuality
No Response
Cut1 said:
Why do you guys want to have a foreskin? It may be true that uncircumcised guys have more feeling, but will you last as long in bed? What about cleanliness and diseases. I was circumcised right after I was born and am glad not to have any foreskin:smile: . I am just curious of why you would want to create another one on a perfectly normal penis. Is it for looks or something:rolleyes: .

Foreskins are normal and are the source of male sexual pleasure. I too was cut as a baby, but, I've been restoring and the difference is amazing. Wait until you hit your mid 30s and start to lose sensation, then you'll begin to understand why a foreskin is so important. What you should do is start now, because I can guarantee you that after a few decades of constantly being abraded by clothing and not having the protection of a hood, your dick is going to lose sensitivity.

Your "perfectly normal penis" is an abnormality in this world. While your friends may also be cut, the vast majority of men in the world aren't.

Just wait until you get a little older and you'll begin to understand. It's so tragic that most men who've been cut don't begin to lose feeling until after they've fathered children and had them cut.
 

SteveHd

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Posts
3,678
Media
0
Likes
79
Points
183
Location
Daytona
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
chico8 said:
... because I can guarantee you that after a few decades of constantly being abraded by clothing and not having the protection of a hood, your dick is going to lose sensitivity.
In fairness I have to say the regain in sensitivity varies from man to man. In my case it was slight or moderate ... others rave about it. The abrasion by clothing was the #1 reason for me. I'm not sexually active and thus the sensitivity gain - a bonus during j/o's - wasn't an objective. I was bothered by underwear rubbing my glans and corona. I cannot put into words how much better it feels not to have the rubbing/tickling from clothing. That reason alone made it worthwhile for me.
Your "perfectly normal penis" is an abnormality in this world. While your friends may also be cut, the vast majority of men in the world aren't.
Ajay38, see: http://www.circumstitions.com/Maps.html
 

jfrsndvs

Experimental Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Posts
352
Media
2
Likes
16
Points
238
Location
Quincy (Illinois, United States)
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
some guys last longer with foreskins just as some don't, and the same goes with some guys that are cut, some last longer while other don't last as long.

as for cleanliness, you can pull the skin back to clean, those who don't are just plain lazy, and what diseases are you talking about? if you are refering to a STD, well my friend, diseases has no preference to cut guys or uncut guys, whether or not if you have foreskin, you can always catch a disease.

those who speak against restoring are always seem to be on the defense for some reason, they always try to say that it's un-natural, I never did figure that one out, when boys are born they have foreskin right? so doesn't that come "naturally"? then a doctor comes and wacks off a chunk of your skin, does that really sound natural? it sure doesn't to me, and when you refer to it as "Normal", please explain what is so normal about a cut cock, other than it looks normal, please explain in detail why you think it's normal.

what in my opinion of a "normal" penis is, one that was left fully intact, one that hasn't been butchered on, and one that fully functions. to me that is a "Normal" penis.

those cut guys, and it's always those who are cut and most likely younger guys, that likes to be critical of a guy that whats to restore what was ripped off of him as a infant.

being circumsized as a infant is wrong in my opinion, that should be left up to the male when he becomes an adult, that way he can choose to have it done for whatever reasons he deems it to be.


Cut1 said:
Why do you guys want to have a foreskin? It may be true that uncircumcised guys have more feeling, but will you last as long in bed? What about cleanliness and diseases. I was circumcised right after I was born and am glad not to have any foreskin:smile: . I am just curious of why you would want to create another one on a perfectly normal penis. Is it for looks or something:rolleyes: .
 

Nomad

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Posts
322
Media
0
Likes
9
Points
163
Gender
Male
I've watched Eastern Eurpean gay porn long enough that I have no doubt that a foreskin is one of nature's wonders. Watching how the skin rolls, knowing that it has extra nerves, and even looking at the smooth and silky glans compared to the rough and keratinized dickheads all around me.

Here is an animation that shows how the bands of nerves move:
http://www.circumstitions.com/Works.html

Even without having the extra nerves, I sometimes get a glimpse of what having a foreskin would feel like. I have enough skin that, if I grip tight without lube about halfway down my cock and move the skin back and forth that way, the rolling sensation is much different than friction--it's much more subtle, but also much more intense. And when I cum, it's an entirely different orgasm altogether (although I can't say it's better, just different).

I don't have the, erm, "balls" to try to restore my foreskin. I've thought about it, but a fake foreskin doesn't seem like any more a consolation prize than what I've already got, especially since I can mimick having one when I want to.
 

Snozzle

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 16, 2006
Posts
1,424
Media
6
Likes
318
Points
403
Location
South Pacific
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Cut1 said:
Why do you guys want to have a foreskin? It may be true that uncircumcised guys have more feeling, but will you last as long in bed?
Yes! Because more sensitivity doesn't just mean more stimulation towards orgasm, it means - like everywhere else on the body - more feedback, which means more awareness of how much stimulation you're getting, and so more control.

What about cleanliness and diseases.
What about them? The foreskin is not a python that's going to rise up and bite you, it's just a bodypart that can be moved for cleaning (and very nice it is to move it too). The man who's too lazy to clean under his foreskin is too lazy to live. Very few and rare diseases are specific to the foreskin, and they are treatable, as and when they occur, like diseases on any other part of the body.

I am just curious of why you would want to create another [foreskin] on a perfectly normal penis. Is it for looks or something:rolleyes: .
Looks is part of it. Women who've had mammectomies routinely have implants or wear falsies just for looks. Do you question that or think they shouldn't? What's normal is leaving the baby's penis alone. The problem, as St Paul nearly said, is that some people have circumcised mindsets, in which a penis with part missing is "normal".
 

chico8

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Posts
727
Media
0
Likes
21
Points
163
Location
Chico
Sexuality
No Response
Nomad said:
Even without having the extra nerves, I sometimes get a glimpse of what having a foreskin would feel like. I have enough skin that, if I grip tight without lube about halfway down my cock and move the skin back and forth that way, the rolling sensation is much different than friction--it's much more subtle, but also much more intense. And when I cum, it's an entirely different orgasm altogether (although I can't say it's better, just different).

I don't have the, erm, "balls" to try to restore my foreskin. I've thought about it, but a fake foreskin doesn't seem like any more a consolation prize than what I've already got, especially since I can mimick having one when I want to.

You're young and you have a lot of loose skin so it probably wouldn't take you very long to restore. The older you get, the longer it takes and the more calloused your glans will be. Tape it up for a few days, the extra moisture from having things closed will make all the difference.
 

Ed69

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2006
Posts
2,890
Media
0
Likes
1,279
Points
258
Location
Oregon (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
chico8 said:
You're young and you have a lot of loose skin so it probably wouldn't take you very long to restore. The older you get, the longer it takes and the more calloused your glans will be. Tape it up for a few days, the extra moisture from having things closed will make all the difference.

I did not take it serious untill I was 30 years old and could not get erect anymore.Now things work great,but not till I got full coverage when flaccid.I'm still working on it,if you look at my pics when I'm erect you realy can't see any extra skin.I'll say it again if you're cut" you will have a problem or you already have had a problem"Just give it time.:redface:
 

ManiacalMadMan

Experimental Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Posts
1,073
Media
0
Likes
21
Points
183
Age
68
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Snozzle said:
Yes! Because more sensitivity doesn't just mean more stimulation towards orgasm, it means - like everywhere else on the body - more feedback, which means more awareness of how much stimulation you're getting, and so more control.
Can you really be that stupid and misinformed? Reading over your past posts the answer is clearly Yes.

I have experience (perhaps too much) and can telll you that I have been with guys who have a foreskin and orgasm before any sexual contact even begins...oh yeah that's superb control On the other side I have been with guys who have been circumcised and can control their orgasm for long periods of time All the extra skin cells for sensitivity and stimulation add more things to keep track of which can and often does make a guy cum faster.
Does my having a foreskin make me cum faster or slower? I would say no. What makes me cum faster is when I am overly turned on by the guy I am with If I know a person I can learn to go slower and have more control as can any man with or without a foreskin However there are still times when I am going to be oozing precum before I have my clothes off. I am not alone in this and as I indicated, I speak from experience and have met many others (again both cut and uncut) who have the same physical going ons So it is not all about the foreskin. I have read enough of your rantings to know that you are pro-skin which is fine but when you talk about stimulation and the such you are clearly speaking out of your rear-end It may interest (or kill you off) to know that the best sexual experiences I ever have had have been with circumcised men They had amaZing control, they knew what they were doing sexually and they were content enough with who they were that they did not spend hours crying about a circumcision I also knew a man who was uncircumcised who used to complain about his damned foreskin One afternoon as he went on about yet again I went to his kitchen and came back with a knife and told him if he didn't stop yapping about it I'd cut the damned thing off myself. It took a while but 2 years later he had an adult circumcision and in my few encounters with him since he has been much better and more in control than he ever was before.

Snozzle said:
What about them? The foreskin is not a python that's going to rise up and bite you, it's just a bodypart that can be moved for cleaning (and very nice it is to move it too). The man who's too lazy to clean under his foreskin is too lazy to live. Very few and rare diseases are specific to the foreskin, and they are treatable, as and when they occur, like diseases on any other part of the body.
No way to argue any of this logic
 

Nomad

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Posts
322
Media
0
Likes
9
Points
163
Gender
Male
chico8 said:
You're young and you have a lot of loose skin so it probably wouldn't take you very long to restore. The older you get, the longer it takes and the more calloused your glans will be. Tape it up for a few days, the extra moisture from having things closed will make all the difference.
What's the best way to get started?