Rob Gronkowski NAKED

rka9018

Experimental Member
Joined
May 10, 2011
Posts
4
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
148
I was just watching the body issue video of espn on him. Maybe I'm crazy but I paused it when he's throwing the football, believe it was either 27 or 37 seconds in and I swear I saw something. It was fuzzy because the motion was so quick. Anybody else better at checking this that could let me know if they see something too?
 
  • Like
Reactions: imafreakinwizard

bigbull29

Worshipped Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
7,577
Media
52
Likes
14,090
Points
343
Location
State College (Pennsylvania, United States)
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
Rob was offered over 4 million dollars to star in a porn flick by Vivid Videos. Seriously, I'd rather fuck a few times for money than play dangerous football. He only has to do it once. LOL.

I think his family and loss of contract were the clear reasons he backed out. He didn't want to tarnish his reputation. Trust me - it's still in the back of his mind.

However, if we knew that his refusal were to be without moral qualms, we could only assume that he is small-endowed.

One more thing: I thought the stud in a straight porno can only be a mere prop. 4 million-dollar stud in a titty flick?

Could you imagine the fame Rob would have if he had a super big cock and made porn? He'd be the stud of studs. The straight men would be drooling for his scenes with uncontrollable staring at his big fucker at the urinal.

I suppose all a porn stud needs to go from prop to star is to be an NFL player. Add a big dick in the mix and you could easily outshine some of the big starlets in a a straight porno.

Stud with fame status = big money in straight porn.

So much for the "male star are just props" by the loud-mouthed T & A crowd.