- Joined
- Feb 17, 2006
- Posts
- 6,058
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 28
- Points
- 183
- Location
- The grey country
- Sexuality
- No Response
In the UK recently, witness evidence was effectively dismissed because the witness was ... wait for it - too honest, of too high a character and too credible and thus her 'witness testimony' may have adversely influenced the jury in their deliberations. So, telling the truth and being credible in court is now cause for one's witness evidence to be disregarded?
Of course I can understand the legal reasoning; in part the possible presumption of racial motivation (based on such a short and positive ID) laying grounds for a potential reversal on appeal. But such an intimation is spurious, hypothetical and above all unproven, and, as I recall, that's what the court of appeal is for ... isn't it?
l
I'd imagine a transcript would make an interesting read, but I also suspect there is a little more to this than meets the eye, in part because it appears to have been covered primarily by the red tops and freebies, but I found this in an online 'broadsheet':
Judge tells female witness: you're too believable - Times Online
Of course I can understand the legal reasoning; in part the possible presumption of racial motivation (based on such a short and positive ID) laying grounds for a potential reversal on appeal. But such an intimation is spurious, hypothetical and above all unproven, and, as I recall, that's what the court of appeal is for ... isn't it?
l
I'd imagine a transcript would make an interesting read, but I also suspect there is a little more to this than meets the eye, in part because it appears to have been covered primarily by the red tops and freebies, but I found this in an online 'broadsheet':
Judge tells female witness: you're too believable - Times Online