Well with due respect and not trying to start a verbal fight with you, but I think you are very narrowly defining the use of the word big to your own understanding. You seem to think that the word big can only be used to describe something or group of things in comparison to a similar set of things that have some sort of equal subset of big things, average things, and small things. Not much in the world is that way. In a perfect bell curve of a category of things, there would be some validity to what you are saying, but a perfect bell curve really hardly ever really occurs. And what I am specifically saying here is that for me, any penis bigger than mine, I consider big. And I kind of think many people feel that way or even specfically agree that any penis bigger than say 5.5 or 6 inches is a big penis. My first boyfriend's penis was about 6.5 very nice thick inches and I considered his penis "big." I think a lot of people would. And when you look at penis statistic charts from scientific studies you see a large distribution of penises that range from 6-7.5 inches. In fact that's often where the biggest range of penises exist. So that's why people like me, and I think, many women do as well, say that most men have big penises.
In all due respect, you are misusing the word big and its use as a descriptor. In order for you to make the assertion that
all elephants are big, you had to be comparing it to
something. Most likely to other mammals or human sizes. So all elephants are big(in comparison to human size) BUT if you are comparing elephants to other elephants, such as we are with penises to other penises, an elephant can be small. Even if on the bell curve of all mammals, most elephants are on the large end, you can still describe an elephant as small, when comparing it to
other elephants.
Imagine observing a massive vacuum of space with nothing in it but a random unknown creature. Nothing to compare it to. You couldn't size them without comparing them to some other species, an item, SOMETHING.
When we are describing a size such as small, big or average, its in comparison to many other things, as a single or few data points with slight variation make it much harder to give a descriptor.
Yes, size descriptors such as big can be subjective. This is where data and facts come in to more properly define what small big and average is. Otherwise, we can all just subjectively call whatever we want anything and cause chaos. (As in "I subjectively think all ants are big, I'm not wrong since its subjective!") Your statement of "any penis bigger than mine is big" while a valid opinion is logically false. Imagine your penis being on the biggest part of a bell curve is your opinion now still correct and all penises smaller than you "Not big"?
I'm not trying to argue as well, just trying to clear up things.
Sorry If it sounds like I'm ranting or my thoughts come across as scattered.
