Russia and trump

[Braalian82]

Er..... pardon ME, Miss, but APPARENTLY you have me confused with someone who actually GIVES A RAT'S ASS about ANYTHING further YOU might have to say. View attachment 1206156

Careful, she’ll post a pic of a woman getting hit in the face with hot dogs. Cause that apparently means something.

 

[Chrysippus]

Ah, the fantasies of Daisymay1: sometimes a weiner is not just a weiner...

 

[Drifterwood]

"She knew not those sweet words she spake,
Nor knew her own sweet way;
But there's never a bird, so sweet a song
Thronged in whose throat all day.

Oh, there were flowers in Storrington
On the turf and on the spray;
But the sweetest flower on Sussex hills
Was the Daisy-flower that day! "

 

[b.c.]

Careful, she’ll post a pic of a woman getting hit in the face with hot dogs. Cause that apparently means something.

Oh? Those were hot dogs? uhmmm.... okay.

 

[Daisymay1]

Er..... pardon ME, Miss, but APPARENTLY you have me confused with someone who actually GIVES A RAT'S ASS about ANYTHING further YOU might have to say. View attachment 1206156

Careful, she’ll post a pic of a woman getting hit in the face with hot dogs. Cause that apparently means something.

I fairly certain they didn't even notice just looks like a Friday night to them.

 

[Daisymay1]

Er..... pardon ME, Miss, but APPARENTLY you have me confused with someone who actually GIVES A RAT'S ASS about ANYTHING further YOU might have to say. View attachment 1206156

We don't like it when things go south do we? Oh my God this is going to be so much fun over the next couple weeks here. Watching you guys try to spin the aggravating defeats one after another and then we got midterms to look forward to. This is the most fun I've ever had with my pants on

 

[Daisymay1]

Er..... pardon ME, Miss, but APPARENTLY you have me confused with someone who actually GIVES A RAT'S ASS about ANYTHING further YOU might have to say. View attachment 1206156

Come on man are you going to take your ball and go home.? LOL hey what do you think about this Obama was so bad with immigration just allowing anybody to come the f*** in Hawaii lawmakers thought president Trump invented immigration laws LOL silly progressives

 

[Daisymay1]

Time to bring in the Queen of Word Salad for a translation.

You’d have to be basalt to qualify for that honor, and that’s still a giant leap in cognition. Soyez de bonne humeur, mon cher monsieur. Vous êtes toujours un gentleman et un érudit. C'est bien mieux que d'être un professeur progressiste socialiste.

She will never be president. You I'm with her dork

 

[Daisymay1]

You didn’t read the article, as usual.

This is incredible. Liberals love any idea as long as it's mandated. Epic stupidity

 

[Daisymay1]

 

[StormfrontFL]

You didn’t read the article, as usual.

You stopped your quote in 2010. You neglected to include this part...

But court decisions, most famously Citizens United, created new types of PACs that are allowed to spend unlimited amounts from unrestricted sources so long as the spending is independent of candidates or parties. That doesn’t tell the full story of the increased importance of “outside spending” since the courts opened the system in 2010, however.

There are other groups now free to spend unrestricted funds advocating the election or defeat of candidates. These groups contend that they are not required to register with the FEC as any sort of PAC because their primary purpose is something other than electoral politics. This spending itself isn’t new. But the use of funds from a virtually unrestricted range of sources, including corporations, began with the most recent court rulings.

In 2016, more than one out of every five dollars spent in connection with presidential and congressional campaigns was spent by committees and groups with access to unlimited and unrestricted sources of funds.

 

[Daisymay1]

You stopped your quote in 2010. You neglected to include this part...

But court decisions, most famously Citizens United, created new types of PACs that are allowed to spend unlimited amounts from unrestricted sources so long as the spending is independent of candidates or parties. That doesn’t tell the full story of the increased importance of “outside spending” since the courts opened the system in 2010, however.

There are other groups now free to spend unrestricted funds advocating the election or defeat of candidates. These groups contend that they are not required to register with the FEC as any sort of PAC because their primary purpose is something other than electoral politics. This spending itself isn’t new. But the use of funds from a virtually unrestricted range of sources, including corporations, began with the most recent court rulings.

In 2016, more than one out of every five dollars spent in connection with presidential and congressional campaigns was spent by committees and groups with access to unlimited and unrestricted sources of funds.

 

[Thikn2velvet1]

You stopped your quote in 2010. You neglected to include this part...

But court decisions, most famously Citizens United, created new types of PACs that are allowed to spend unlimited amounts from unrestricted sources so long as the spending is independent of candidates or parties. That doesn’t tell the full story of the increased importance of “outside spending” since the courts opened the system in 2010, however.

There are other groups now free to spend unrestricted funds advocating the election or defeat of candidates. These groups contend that they are not required to register with the FEC as any sort of PAC because their primary purpose is something other than electoral politics. This spending itself isn’t new. But the use of funds from a virtually unrestricted range of sources, including corporations, began with the most recent court rulings.

In 2016, more than one out of every five dollars spent in connection with presidential and congressional campaigns was spent by committees and groups with access to unlimited and unrestricted sources of funds.

Yes and you didnt go further into the links cited inside the article. My contention was honest and accurate, CU has had very little effect on election outcomes.

You leftists can make CU a big bad bogeyman but it isnt affecting election outcomes today. Philosophically you can argue against the idea that corporations aren’t people and that is a fair argument but it hasn’t changed a thing practically.

 

[Daisymay1]

Yes and you didnt go further into the links cited inside the article. My contention was honest and accurate, CU has had very little effect on election outcomes.

You leftists can make CU a big bad bogeyman but it isnt affecting election outcomes today. Philosophically you can argue against the idea that corporations aren’t people and that is a fair argument but it hasn’t changed a thing practically.

Thought police hard a work. Liberal bullies

 

[Industrialsize]

criminal obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. 1505, 1512), subornation of perjury (18 U.S.C. 1622), conspiracy (18 U.S.C. 371) and likely aiding and abetting perjury (18 U.S.C. 2).

Howard Mortman on Twitter

 

[185248]

I wonder what sort of collusion happened between Russia and the US to pull down the Berlin Wall?

Don't get me wrong....Don is a total bag of bullshit.

But hey......you are not privy, I am not privy to information which dictates your fate as well as mine.

Why are we not discussing this?

Let's take the Queen of the UK..

She would have the advanced chance to save most of her family from early warning due to connections..................the rest of us can whither and die.

Yet...for some reason...the rich, the royals survive throughout the millennia....and no-one asks why?

So.......Why? You did not elect them, I did not elect them. I bare no responsibility to their fate, because they have no bearing on mine.

So, why do they possess the power they do to dictate millions up on millions fate?

They own huge estates, most of the time only occupied by maintenance staff. The upkeep is on the taxpayer.....Why?

So Mehgan... US citizen has married into the Royal family............................Tell me......who did not see that coming?

So now Disney World has a true US Princess to animate............................what a load of fucking shit.

I won't be alive....but I bet you any money you like, their offspring will run for President of the US in 30 years time....and the media will lap it up.

 

[185248]

Their kids and grandkids will still be here..........but yours and mine won't be. Because after WW1...WW2...then.....WW3 and WW4 theirs will still be there to tell us we need to preserve the past for their own survival.

 

[chrisrobin]

I wonder what sort of collusion happened between Russia and the US to pull down the Berlin Wall?

Don't get me wrong....Don is a total bag of bullshit.

But hey......you are not privy, I am not privy to information which dictates your fate as well as mine.

Why are we not discussing this?

Let's take the Queen of the UK..

She would have the advanced chance to save most of her family from early warning due to connections..................the rest of us can whither and die.

Yet...for some reason...the rich, the royals survive throughout the millennia....and no-one asks why?

So.......Why? You did not elect them, I did not elect them. I bare no responsibility to their fate, because they have no bearing on mine.

So, why do they possess the power they do to dictate millions up on millions fate?

They own huge estates, most of the time only occupied by maintenance staff. The upkeep is on the taxpayer.....Why?

So Mehgan... US citizen has married into the Royal family............................Tell me......who did not see that coming?

So now Disney World has a true US Princess to animate............................what a load of fucking shit.

I won't be alive....but I bet you any money you like, their offspring will run for President of the US in 30 years time....and the media will lap it up.

Your pontification about things you have no knowledge of is astounding but I have to admit that your ignorance does make to chuckle because sure as eggs is eggs some simpleton will believe you.

 

[185248]

Your pontification about things you have no knowledge of is astounding but I have to admit that your ignorance does make to chuckle because sure as eggs is eggs some simpleton will believe you.

My ignorance far outweighs your royal encumbrance. Your loyalty is tied to bloodline.

When your Queen's representative here in Australia held a hand in dismissing a democratically elected Prime Minister back in the 70's. Whether he was acting in the best interests of our country or not speaks volumes of your Royal family.

Your Queen, had no right to interfere. But she did...due to our outdated constitution.

Your posts are totally ignorant of fact and history. You don't have children, nor grandchildren.

Until you are able to have some sort of future to pass your opinions on to. Please refrain from posting your diluted facts of history.

 

[chrisrobin]

My ignorance far outweighs your royal encumbrance. Your loyalty is tied to bloodline.

When your Queen's representative here in Australia held a hand in dismissing a democratically elected Prime Minister back in the 70's. Whether he was acting in the best interests of our country or not speaks volumes of your Royal family.

Your Queen, had no right to interfere. But she did...due to our outdated constitution.

Your posts are totally ignorant of fact and history. You don't have children, nor grandchildren.

Until you are able to have some sort of future to pass your opinions on to. Please refrain from posting your diluted facts of history.

your last line took the words right out of my mouth