Not trying to be sarcastic, but you should go back and read the post. Did I misunderstand? Were you asking him to look up the meaning of "christian" or was there another word in his post to which you referred?Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY@Oct 4 2005, 03:31 PM
Not trying to be sarcastic, but you may want to try looking up the meaning of the word.
[post=348813]Quoted post[/post]
What is the sacrilege in offending Christians?Originally posted by jay_too+Oct 4 2005, 07:04 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jay_too @ Oct 4 2005, 07:04 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-SUMYUNGUY@Oct 3 2005, 04:25 AM
Why is it that the left holds so dear to them not offending any group, save for the Christians?[post=348335]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by jay_too@Oct 5 2005, 12:54 AM
sacrilegious adj. 1. Disrespectful toward something sacredROFANE 2. Guilty of sacrilege.
I doubt that sacrilegious was the appropriate word since Christians tend to be mortal and not part of the diety.
[post=348885]Quoted post[/post]
I assume you are the Red Queen, correct or suffer the same malady. :evilgrin:Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY@Oct 5 2005, 02:12 AM
I know exactly what words I chose and what they meant, Jay.
Sacrilegious was the word I meant to use because it described the point I am trying to make. If the whole thing is beyond your understanding, then I am hardly to blame.
[post=348907]Quoted post[/post]
oh well then, tough shit. they'll just have to deal with it.Originally posted by GoneA@Oct 4 2005, 11:26 PM
It is quite sacrilegious to affront/slight, Christians, Buddhist, Muslims, Taoist or any persons in a religious office.[post=348867]Quoted post[/post]
oh well then, tough shit. they'll just have to deal with it.Originally posted by Dr Rock+Oct 5 2005, 03:03 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr Rock @ Oct 5 2005, 03:03 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-GoneA@Oct 4 2005, 11:26 PM
It is quite sacrilegious to affront/slight, Christians, Buddhist, Muslims, Taoist or any persons in a religious office.[post=348867]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Dr Rock@Oct 4 2005, 10:03 PM
oh well then, tough shit. they'll just have to deal with it.
Originally posted by GoneA+Oct 5 2005, 01:37 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(GoneA @ Oct 5 2005, 01:37 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-jay_too@Oct 5 2005, 12:54 AM
sacrilegious adj. 1. Disrespectful toward something sacredROFANE 2. Guilty of sacrilege.
I doubt that sacrilegious was the appropriate word since Christians tend to be mortal and not part of the diety.
[post=348885]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY+Oct 3 2005, 12:25 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SUMYUNGUY @ Oct 3 2005, 12:25 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Why is it that the left holds so dear to them not offending any group, save for the Christians?
... seems to have a double set of standards. No respect for those with a moral guideline, yet total reverence for anyone outside that group with other ideas? ...
Is it hypocrisy of falsely perceived hypocrisy?
[post=348335]Quoted post[/post][/b]
Originally posted by jay_too@Oct 4 2005, 03:04 PM
What is the sacrilege in offending Christians? I have known some pretty offensive bible spouters; whether or not they are Christian is another matter.
jay
[post=348803]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY@Oct 4 2005, 03:31 PM
Not trying to be sarcastic, but you may want to try looking up the meaning of the word.
[post=348813]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by DC_DEEP@Oct 4 2005, 04:59 PM
Uh, perhaps he was making a distinction between "professed christian" and "practicing christian." If I claim to be a "born-again christian," but promulgate hatred and malcontent, is that truly being a christian? Fred Phelps claims to be a heaven-bound christian, with a frighteningly large following, but with his ACTIVE promotion of EXTERMINATION of a SIGNIFICANT segment of our planet's population, is he TRULY a CHRISTIAN?Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY@Oct 4 2005, 03:31 PM
Not trying to be sarcastic, but you may want to try looking up the meaning of the word.
[post=348813]Quoted post[/post]
[post=348840]Quoted post[/post]
Lexically, perhaps. But not within the contextual parameters you set up in the first sentence of your original post.Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY@Oct 4 2005, 05:06 PM
Irrelevant to the topic.
[post=348842]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY@Oct 4 2005, 05:50 PM
...No, not Christian. Sacrilegious.
[post=348850]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY+Oct 5 2005, 05:22 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SUMYUNGUY @ Oct 5 2005, 05:22 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Dr Rock@Oct 4 2005, 10:03 PM
oh well then, tough shit. they'll just have to deal with it.
clue time: i'm not a "homosexual"Originally posted by Dr Rock+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr Rock)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-SUMYUNGUY
As much as a homosexual, like you, should just "have to deal" with intolerance?
So, do you go to a homosexual doctor? Or does your doctor vomit on you when you are having a physical?Originally posted by Dr. Dilznick@Oct 5 2005, 08:56 AM
Let's define what it means to be a homosexual. I'll set the official boundaries right now. If the mere thought of another man's penis or anus doesn't make you want to vomit, you're a homosexual.
[post=349027]Quoted post[/post]