Sad, just a sad story.

[Ericsson1228d]

Some of you are pretty good at being mind-readers and knowing who does and who doesn't care about what. You should turn that into a marketable skill set.

I know is that I have not stooped to your level of name calling or personal attacks.

I apologize if my arguments are logical, which seems to frustrate you so that you cannot assemble a coherent though and reply with anything but ad hominem attacks. I refuse to lower the level of discourse, which seems to be the goal of many on this board.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

Some of you are pretty good at being mind-readers and knowing who does and who doesn't care about what. You should turn that into a marketable skill set. I know is that I have not stooped to your level of name calling or personal attacks.

Yes you have. It's just not as blatant.
But yeah, when you quote someone and refer to them as "liberal", considering your negative attitude towards them, it doesn't take a rocket scientist that you don't mean that in an endearing way.

I apologize if my arguments are logical,

Trying to blame everything you think is wrong with the world on "liberals" is not logical.

which seems to frustrate you so that you cannot assemble a coherent though and reply with anything but ad hominem attacks. I refuse to lower the level of discourse, which seems to be the goal of many on this board.

LOL... frustrated? You don't think people just love to prove people like you wrong? It's obvious you don't know much about the Politics forums, do you? BTW, ever find those extra 970,000 people from the rally on Saturday?

 

[Ericsson1228d]

Yes you have. It's just not as blatant.
But yeah, when you quote someone and refer to them as "liberal", considering your negative attitude towards them, it doesn't take a rocket scientist that you don't mean that in an endearing way.



Trying to blame everything you think is wrong with the world on "liberals" is not logical.



LOL... frustrated? You don't think people just love to prove people like you wrong? It's obvious you don't know much about the Politics forums, do you? BTW, ever find those extra 970,000 people from the rally on Saturday?

Nope, never found them. I just reported on a news article about it. There was an overestimation. My fault for citing an erroneous article.

I'm not going to try and say there were 2 million and rant and rave. I saw the pics, it looked like way more than 30K (I have been in Michigan's Big House with 103K fans, and the March looked bigger than that by quite a margin), but I wasn't there to take a head count, so I will rely on the news reporting of the event.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

I guess this means we now know not to just blindly trust everything we see in a news article.