I have a question for all and please do not take this the wrong way nor am I trying to start a flame war either but I need to ask this because I have posted other places and the readers took it the wrong way.
For people who are newly infected did you not know that Hiv was around or did you maybe have a lapse in judgement? Lets not forget the other diseases you can receive from another human being.
My question is the following...Why should the govt help you pay for meds when it was your CHOICE to engage in casual sex(safe or otherwise) you knew the risk and yet you engaged and now if you cannot afford it, you want some assistance with keeping you alive when you made the choice to have sex. I myself have only been with 3 men in 12 years and all in a relationship and I choose not to have sex period because of the nuts out there but that is my choice and I have to live with the fact that I am not having fun like the rest of the world but at least I take confort knowing I will die being somewhat healthy..
Like I said, I am not starting a flamewar but just something I wanted to tell your guys and girls on this websight... thank you
EDIT - I decided to make it a PM rather than a public post.
That's a shame but remains your choice: it was a valuable contribution to an otherwise toxic OP.
I totally agree. I thought it was a great post.
OK, here it is:-
Ladsonbehr, I'm of a similar age to you and was sexually active and hoping to find a partner in London when the epidemic started in north America in the late 70s. In fact I was aware of the threat before most people over here because I subscribed to scientific magazines which were reporting the first cases of what was then known as GRID (gay-related immune deficiency) when the cause was unknown.
Being a bit of an amateur epidemiologist I figured it was most likely a new STD even while speculation ranged over poppers, lifestyle burnout and other possible causes. I was quickly convinced in my own mind that anal intercourse was the most likely transmission route in gay men while the authorities just coyly referred to gay sex without any specifics. If only they'd said it was fucking that was responsible - use a condom! By the time they did it was too late for most of my cohort who couldn't face a life of celibacy and isolation.
I withdrew from the gay scene and became almost sexually inactive, concentrating on my work life. I was something of a Cassandra figure amongst my friends (the woman in Greek mythology cursed by Apollo with the gift of accurate prophesy which no-one would believe) on the subject of the new disease.
In 1986 some of my closest friends were diagnosed hiv positive and I was hearing of the deaths of old aquaintances. Then the illnesses and hospital-visiting started. I did not say "I told you so, I tried to warn you" - what would have been the point? They already knew and had to live and die with that. 1990 began my years of funerals. I was honoured to participate in the eulogy at some. I concentrated on the good times and the happy memories of what good people they were and the contributions they had made to the world.
But it was all having its toll on me and by 1992 I was virtually an urban hermit when my last surviving hiv friend saw I was in a bad state and took me to a charity that catered for people affected as well as those infected by hiv. There I met, among others, newly-diagnosed people, gay and straight, and heard many stories.
Stories of mistakes, bad judgements, naivity, wrong assumptions, ignorance, misguided love, betrayal by partners, even rapes. The common factor was human interaction.
There will always be new infections until a cure is found. Especially with the three-month window between infection and testing positive. It is pointless to apportion blame after the fact - treatment, support and education are the only valid responses to the ongoing crisis. Every new infection is a tragedy with repercussions that go beyond the individual concerned.
In an ideal world there would be no new infections, but we don't live in an ideal world and if we are to be judged at all, it will be on how we reacted to these tragedies. Whether we showed care and sympathy or disdain.
You might die "somewhat healthy" (lol!), but what comfort will you take in having missed out on not just the "fun", but also the humanity, compassion and interaction that is the actual point of life.
I've now lived long enough to lose friends and loved ones to other causes. And that's the common factor. We all die in the end. There's far more to life than tax dollars.
I only feel able to say this to you because I could easily have taken the same point of view as you now have, but I realised it was leading me nowhere.
EDIT: I did recieve a reply from Ladsonbehr which reveals that he is not the heartless unaffected monster one might assume from his OP.