Safe Sex Strategy with NO CONDOMS

D_Renyson_Ripbottom

Just Browsing
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Posts
56
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
91
How safe do you think is this Strategy to protect against HIV.

It's in a purely heterosexual context, the partner is female.

- Ask every sex partner when they had fever the last time. If any longer fever period in the last 3 months be careful since it could indicate an Acute HIV Infection.

- Ask how often condoms were used in the recent time.

- Test every partner with a Home Test Rapid Test (from idiagnosticsco.com). It's a blood based test, results in 15 minutes, 99% accuracy and approved by WHO/Unicef but not FDA.

- Most people develop detectable antibodies after 4 weeks
- Most people have Acute HIV Infection 2-4 weeks after infection, for an average of 28 days.

So if she had fever/flu like symptoms recently or tests positive stay away.

Otherwise it should be safe to have ORAL and VAGINAL sex without condom. NO ANAL.

Given all the tests above we can assume she is HIV negative. Should she be HIV positive the risk for infection is actually very low, that is 0.5 / 10.000 or 5 / 10.000 per exposure. So that's less than 0.1% per sex act - should the test not work or something.

Condoms are 85% effective. How effective is my strategy?

What do you think?
 

D_Renyson_Ripbottom

Just Browsing
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Posts
56
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
91
I think my partner nor do I wouldn't want to fuck anymore afer so many tests.

Of course under such preconditions the mood would be gone.

However, I do this more discretely.

You can harmlessly ask a person when she had fever the last time, and then interrogate further.

On the first date I would give her oral or manual orgasms, but refrain from actual sex unless she's so horny that she jumps on my cock.

After I ensured she is sufficiently satisfied (preferably without actual sex) she's far more inclined to do a HIV test.

Sometimes it happens that the girl is so aroused that she literally jumps on my cock. Should we have had sex and she was actually positive the chance of HIV infection from vaginal intercourse is still < 0.1%. If you find out she's positive you could still take PEP.

I do the rapid test with ALL of my partners. No exceptions. Or strict condom usage.

I usually have mini relationships that last from a few days to a month where I stay with the same person. Then I go somewhere else.

I think that's much safer than condom usage (85% protection) with untested partners.
 
Last edited:

Fredro

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2007
Posts
266
Media
0
Likes
26
Points
163
Location
Crescent City, Florida
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
So, let me get this straight - Chlamydia - worth a piece of ass. Gonorrhea - worth a piece of ass. Hepatitis A,B,C, etc. - worth a piece of ass. Genital warts - worth a piece of ass. Herpes - worth a piece of ass. Syphilis - worth a piece of ass.

Wow - I must be so out of touch with things.

LOL - I can see you talking to your doctor:

Doctor - "How did you get syphilis?"
You - "Don't know but it was worth it!"
 
Last edited:

ScorpioSlut

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Posts
593
Media
11
Likes
83
Points
448
Age
40
Location
Tennessee
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
I agree with Kotchanski on this one. That system is totally flawed. And no STD is "worth it". If any man asked me to follow that system I would laugh the entire time I was kicking his ass to the curb.
 

SEXXXX

Experimental Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Posts
291
Media
2
Likes
4
Points
103
Location
NYC
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
why's people make such a big deal out of condoms? it's worth it, 85% effective is better than 0%
 

D_Renyson_Ripbottom

Just Browsing
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Posts
56
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
91
So far everybody has agreed to it.

I have sex only after the women has had at least one orgasm. So they know they get more out of it than just a Wam. Bam. Thanks Ma'am.

I test myself regularly, every month. I re-test my partners every month.
I don't explain my system to my partners. If they want to stay with me they get tested or they can go. If we had sex they get tested either way.

This is the same strategy used in the porn industry, and the only HIV infections I am aware of were from double anal penetrations with internal ejaculations -- could there be anything more riskier?

I've had only one STD so far: Gonorrhea. And it raised a lot of red flags about that particular female. I refrained from unprotected sex for a long time unless I could be sure she is HIV negative.

I am not doing unprotected ANAL. Only ORAL and VAGINAL bareback.

Almost all people would have unprotected ORAL sex with somebody of unknown status (or when was the last time you used a dental dam?).
VAGINAL sex is not much more riskier.
 
Last edited:

gdesguy

Expert Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 25, 2009
Posts
197
Media
0
Likes
102
Points
258
Location
New York (United States)
Verification
View
Gender
Male
Sex without a condom is generally a BAD idea unless both you and your partner have been monogamous for 3 months and have both been tested. I don't know how bad it is for straight men, but unprotected sex (anal sex especially) for gay men is just a terrible idea. One of my very good friends (who was always VERY safe) had a condom break ONCE, and now he is HIV positive.
Just wear the condom, its worth it.
 

Honey123

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 6, 2007
Posts
1,286
Media
5
Likes
33
Points
393
Location
Aridzona
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
You silly man, there is only one way to prevent all risk of infection during sex - have sex alone or don't have sex. Abstinence is not necessarily a bad thing. Sex within a monogamous relationship is also 100% safe - as long as both parties are complete faithful to each other.
 

ScorpioSlut

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Posts
593
Media
11
Likes
83
Points
448
Age
40
Location
Tennessee
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
Just wear the condom, its worth it.


You can say that again. Can you imagine how expensive his lil system is??? Not to mention the trouble you have to go to. I'm pretty sure a condom is still the safest, most effective and most economical way to provide yourself and your partner with a safe sexual experience.
 

Fredro

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2007
Posts
266
Media
0
Likes
26
Points
163
Location
Crescent City, Florida
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
To be honest - It sounds to me like the guy has control issues and he puts his sexual partners through all the "testing" to make himself feel more in control of the situation.
 

ScorpioSlut

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Posts
593
Media
11
Likes
83
Points
448
Age
40
Location
Tennessee
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
To be honest - It sounds to me like the guy has control issues and he puts his sexual partners through all the "testing" to make himself feel more in control of the situation.


I'd have to agree. I'd not be surprised to hear about him injecting his potential partners with vaccines/antibiotics/etc. for all of those diseases just to ensure he didn't get it. Yes I know not all of them have them....but he's probably waiting on the edge of his seat for their release.
 

D_Renyson_Ripbottom

Just Browsing
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Posts
56
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
91
Sex without a condom is generally a BAD idea unless both you and your partner have been monogamous for 3 months and have both been tested. I don't know how bad it is for straight men, but unprotected sex (anal sex especially) for gay men is just a terrible idea. One of my very good friends (who was always VERY safe) had a condom break ONCE, and now he is HIV positive.
Just wear the condom, its worth it.

So what you're saying is that you can catch HIV also if you use a condom. So you are only getting 10% of feeling of real sex and then you die anyways from AIDS.

Under that situatation it would make only sense to test all your partners - even if you use condoms.

If the partner
- tests HIV negative
- had no signs of an Acute HIV infection (fever, rash, ...) in last 3 months
then the risk of an HIV infection is non-existent.

You can't get HIV from a person who doesn't have it.

No need to use condoms then ...
 

strutter2

Experimental Member
Joined
May 18, 2009
Posts
159
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
101
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Cowboyrex - I really can't believe your ignorance and stupidity. Well you deserve whatever but I feel very sorry for your partners. You seem to think that HIV is only caught via anal sex - wrong, you also seem blissfully unaware that your body usually takes between 3-6 months to actually show the HIV antibodies - therefore your little home test kit can only be accurate if the person you are with last had sex 3-6 months ago. What if she had sex a week ago, contracted HIV? You going to dive in their with your dick and catch it too! Hilarious - I really cannot believe such ridiculous levels of ignorance still exist in the world today.
Well Cowboy - you keep your pretty little head in the sand and see what you manage to catch -oh and then there's HEp B and C - C incurable and eventually fatal, and there's HPV - help yourself to a dose of penile cancer (what will you do when your penis has to be removed?), bit of Herpes (incurable), you've already had gonorrhea, and probably still have Clamydia (you might happily have been made infertile - god help any child of yours being brought up in such amazing ignorance - won't have a chance).

Condoms are nearly 100% effective if used properly - i.e. you use the right size, you put it on properly, you use lube, you change it after 30 minutes, and you take it off properly.
God I'd want a body condom with you - an extra strong one at that.
 

strutter2

Experimental Member
Joined
May 18, 2009
Posts
159
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
101
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
COwboyrex - you foolishness is astounding - not everybody who contracts HIV will experience flu like symptoms!