Sam Mooney (tiktok)

[yellow300zx]

Yeah me! Actually like his content he provides now altho he does a bit too much of recycled content he posted before

Any bicep shots?

 

[Anglosophy]

Save your time and $, he's a teaser, never willing to show anything

 

[Clearlybeingstalkedonhere]

Save your time and $, he's a teaser, never willing to show anything

we knew that lol. Tiktokers are scammers on OF. All they care about is taking advantage of their fanbase for money

 

[Apl1994]

we knew that lol. Tiktokers are scammers on OF. All they care about is taking advantage of their fanbase for money

You understand you don't need to be nude for onlyfans right? It's not a scam. Y'all are just desparate for dick and mad when it's not shown. Your own fault if you spend money on that site. Unless they explicitly say they show full nudes, it's a you issue being let down.

 

[Clearlybeingstalkedonhere]

You understand you don't need to be nude for onlyfans right? It's not a scam. Y'all are just desparate for dick and mad when it's not shown. Your own fault if you spend money on that site. Unless they explicitly say they show full nudes, it's a you issue being let down.

Some of us don’t want to pay money for content that can be shown on instagram, believe it or not

 

[sgt.smelly]

You understand you don't need to be nude for onlyfans right? It's not a scam. Y'all are just desparate for dick and mad when it's not shown. Your own fault if you spend money on that site. Unless they explicitly say they show full nudes, it's a you issue being let down.

You're correct that OF accounts don't have to show nudity. Nobody is obligated to show more of themselves than they want, and nobody is entitled to see nudes of anyone else, whether private or semi-public figures.

However, what is occurring with many OF accounts is not without context: creators know that the audience is hoping for, if not expecting, nudity/porn. This is especially true when the sole reason for the creator to have an OF account is to show off their body (it's not like they're doing cooking tutorials). Therefore, when the creator charges real money for various photos or short clips with suggestive descriptions, they are doing so in an effort to take advantage of their audience. The intent is to trick the audience into assuming the content shows nudity, with full knowledge that if the audience knew there wasn't nudity they'd be far less likely to purchase the content. This is in fact a form of fraud, even if it's perfectly legal.

We also need to compare the cost of OF accounts to the cost of actual porn, were one to subscribe to a porn website or group of sites. Double-digit monthly fees, with additional double-digit fees for individual pieces of content, carry with them a set of expectations from the audience in terms of content quality. Generally, people are going to define "quality" in this context as including explicit content, large quantity of content (long videos, lots of photos), in addition to basic quality that we often take for granted (visibility, picture sharpness/lightning, sound, etc).

A single person, or even someone who's OF account is being managed by some firm, may not be able to provide the quality of content that a commercial porn site can (although the OF audience is often paying for the amateur feel and tone; the "girl/boy next door" concept). But it's not unreasonable to expect that, for such a high price, the payer will be receiving content that meets their expectations. Shirtless photos that could be found on instagram or twitter are obviously not going to meet those expectations, so you can expect that customers will complain.

 

[yellow300zx]

View attachment 79764711
how is this guy so fricken hott, also does anyone know if he OF is really worth buying cuz im considering it.

It’s not worth it

 

[MissMelody]

Has anyone purchased this one? Is it worth it?

 

[Anglosophy]

You understand you don't need to be nude for onlyfans right? It's not a scam. Y'all are just desparate for dick and mad when it's not shown. Your own fault if you spend money on that site. Unless they explicitly say they show full nudes, it's a you issue being let down.

All his posts are on the sexual side (or highly suggestive of penile exposure) so.... what do you think we should expect from his OF? Face care instructions?

 

[SammyD]

That’s how teases work lol

Yeah but it lets you use your imagination a bit

 

[MissMelody]

Ugh he’s so close to showing something

Thank you, was this ppv or feed?

 

[SammyD]

Thank you, was this ppv or feed?

Feed

 

[MissMelody]

Feed

That’s actually surprising, might consider re subscribing

 

[Clearlybeingstalkedonhere]

I’m skeptical

It’s $100 but really worth $5

Nobody trusts him

 

[JDFeet]

I’m skeptical

It’s $100 but really worth $5

$100 for 11 seconds? Really? CJ Clark is hotter and you get 30+ mins for actual content and it’s cheaper

 

[Clearlybeingstalkedonhere]

$100 for 11 seconds? Really? CJ Clark is hotter and you get 30+ mins for actual content and it’s cheaper

This exactly and he gives good content withtout playing games.

 

[Azor_Ahai]

I’m skeptical

It’s $100 but really worth $5

He’s selling that same ppv for $50 on his paid page. Def not worth it, doesn’t even show a glimse of his cock.

 

[Clearlybeingstalkedonhere]

He’s selling that same ppv for $50 on his paid page. Def not worth it, doesn’t even show a glimse of his cock.

He’s a pos for that

 

[Clearlybeingstalkedonhere]

Nice so Sam knows where to go lol

 

[Anglosophy]

I’m skeptical

It’s $100 but really worth $

Believe it or not it could be a clip of SpongeBob... forget about it, there are tons of cocks out there better than his