Sarah Palin is resigning

SEXXXX

Experimental Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Posts
291
Media
2
Likes
4
Points
103
Location
NYC
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
Yes she ACHIEVED new heights of incoherence in her resignation speech, so much so that it needed translation into English.

You really are a left-wing noise, aren't you? But of course, you understand her better than anybody
 

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,256
Media
213
Likes
32,280
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male

SEXXXX

Experimental Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Posts
291
Media
2
Likes
4
Points
103
Location
NYC
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
Did you listen to her speech? I dare you to read it and try to make sense of the tortured grammer and syntax. Remember, she has degree in Broadcast Journalism.:

Sarah Palin Resignation Speech: FULL VIDEO, TEXT

She was obviously under somekind of duress, I just don't want to speculate

Did I mention her ACHIEVEMENT again? Few here superceed that unless you're an ex veep contender

If you follow her post, you must understand how liberal was Huffington achievement in both status and wealth :rolleyes:
 

SEXXXX

Experimental Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Posts
291
Media
2
Likes
4
Points
103
Location
NYC
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
Read the speech and it rambles. Swerves and strikes and bounces around without cohering.

Still, it was an easier to read bit than any of SEXXXX's contrubtions.


I laud Bill in that sense, he delivered a much grammatically correct statement when lying under oath
 
Last edited:

ZOS23xy

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Posts
4,906
Media
3
Likes
31
Points
258
Location
directly above the center of the earth
I did read the "speech". If she's under duress, she knows she going to be indicted for fraud. There's a noticeable lack of logic, and a lot of play on emotional tag lines to rouse the true Alaskan Spirit.

It is as much bullshit as she gave when was was a VP nominee.

I find it hard to understand people who will commit to a out and out shell of a person that Sarah Palin has consistantly revealed herself to be. Then again. Bush had his supporters. Nixon had his supporters. Hell, even David Duke had supporters...
 

SEXXXX

Experimental Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Posts
291
Media
2
Likes
4
Points
103
Location
NYC
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
I did read the "speech". If she's under duress, she knows she going to be indicted for fraud. There's a noticeable lack of logic, and a lot of play on emotional tag lines to rouse the true Alaskan Spirit.

It is as much bullshit as she gave when was was a VP nominee.

I find it hard to understand people who will commit to a out and out shell of a person that Sarah Palin has consistantly revealed herself to be. Then again. Bush had his supporters. Nixon had his supporters. Hell, even David Duke had supporters...

I find it hard to understand that sentence either

Then again, both far lefties and far righties here only to make noise
 

B_VinylBoy

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,363
Media
0
Likes
70
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I suggest you should check her story before coming up with any :biggrin1:

Just a suggestion

Like that changes anything?
To be brutally honest, I know we haven't seen the last of Palin and I wouldn't be surprised if she does try to make a run for the presidency in 2012. It wouldn't be the first time that someone, that the general consensus wouldn't think has a shot at winning, entered into the race. Just ask Ralph Nader or Ron Paul.

Again, you say and emphasize the word "liberal" like it's wrong to be one. You're dabbling in the same failed sense of campaigning of the conservative base for such a long time, thinking that the more a word is said in a "scary tone" the more people will believe it's a problem. It suggests that people look at issues in binary, and we all know Politics is far from that. So yeah, please emphasize LIBERAL as much as you want. It doesn't change anyone's mind or beliefs, nor does it automatically discredit their opinions and analysis.
 

SEXXXX

Experimental Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Posts
291
Media
2
Likes
4
Points
103
Location
NYC
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
Like that changes anything?
To be brutally honest, I know we haven't seen the last of Palin and I wouldn't be surprised if she does try to make a run for the presidency in 2012. It wouldn't be the first time that someone, that the general consensus wouldn't think has a shot at winning, entered into the race. Just ask Ralph Nader or Ron Paul.

Again, you say and emphasize the word "liberal" like it's wrong to be one. You're dabbling in the same failed sense of campaigning of the conservative base for such a long time, thinking that the more a word is said in a "scary tone" the more people will believe it's a problem. It suggests that people look at issues in binary, and we all know Politics is far from that. So yeah, please emphasize LIBERAL as much as you want. It doesn't change anyone's mind or beliefs, nor does it automatically discredit their opinions and analysis.

I still don't see how one emphasized word can create a revolution of mind, beliefs or discredit opinions and analysis

CREATIVE though
 

B_VinylBoy

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,363
Media
0
Likes
70
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I still don't see how one emphasized word can create a revolution of mind, beliefs or discredit opinions and analysis

So why did you do it? I think it's pretty obvious that most people here associate with the liberal mindset. Certainly not to the point where someone had to emphasize it twice? Liberal? "Left-Wing Noise"? I'm sorry... who or what you were trying to bring to the table with these kinds of comments if you didn't think that somehow people would see it and join your side of the argument?

Political buzzwords are the most tired thing in our society today. One word, and everyone is supposed to have a reaction. Liberal. Conservative. Drugs. Taxes. Terror. It really panders to the lowest common denominator and never focuses on the real issue.
 
Last edited:
D

deleted15807

Guest
I thought the word liberal was passé. It's now socialist.
 

transformer_99

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Posts
2,429
Media
0
Likes
10
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male