Saying No To A Big Cock.

[Scarletbegonia]

This is so true. I got the genetics from both sides of my family. Both grandfathers, uncles, father, cousins, all enormous. But growing up, my older relatives shared some things on how a man might tell about a woman's natural vagina size, and ability to stretch wider or not, and depth or not. I heard at an early age the limerick "Tall woman, big hole, short woman ALL hole." It was explained that "tall" was 5'9" and over, and short was 5'2" and less. Over the decades, I've heard others repeat that same limerick.

There are exceptions, of course. And some women get "stretched out" by natural birthing of multiple children, and extended relationships with other big to bigger to biggest very extremely endowed men.

And while it doesn't always hold true, I've noticed some other visual indicators of a woman's appearance that seem to correlate with the depth and size of a ladies vagina. Keep in mind that in my experience, these are not hard and fast rules, but do seem to have a correlation. And the more "indicators", the more likely I've found that it is true. And with those ladies who I've met who have three quarters or more of the "indicators" it has always held true, without exception. So scoff if you like, these are just things I've noticed. And interestingly to me, some of the women told me they themselves knew this too and how their own outer physical traits, within their own families, were indicators as well to them that had the familial trait of a "big pussy".

For a lady blessed with a deeper vagina...even in her own opinion she is herself "bottomless".
1. A long angular face structure.
2. A long forehead.
3. A long nose line.
4. A long angular chin.
5. A long neck.
6. Long, thin arms.
7. Long thin hands and fingers.
8. A long for her height torso.
9. Heavy/thick hair, eyebrows, and pubic hair (if she hasn't shaved/trimmed, this is easier to tell but often the remaining outline of where the lady grows to is the indicator).
10. Busty for her frame...though I've noticed this is not always the case for the tallest ladies who have all the other "features", but sometimes it is. Keep in mind "busty" is not a C or D cup, but significantly larger.
11. Thin or thinner legs, or athletic "dancer" legs. As an example I've noticed from her pictures Ms. C on lpsg has similar legs.

For a lady naturally blessed with a wider stretching vagina, able to adjust comfortably to a lot of girth/width, not altered in life by multiple childbirths or experiences with other men.
1. A wide forehead with the hairline back on the sides of the head.
2. The eye sockets are wider to the very edge of the face contour.
3. The nostrils of the nose are wider and prominently so.
4. The mouth is wider than most women's.
5. Long hands and fingers.
6. Butt is not necessarily big, often high and somewhat small, but the pelvis seems to be wider creating a gap between their legs.
7. Thin or thinner legs, or athletic "dancer" legs. As an example I've noticed from her pictures Ms C on lpsg has similar legs.
8. Busty for her frame...thought I've noticed that this is not always the case for the tallest ladies who have all the other "features", but it sometimes is. Keep in mind "busty" is not a C or D cup, but significantly larger.

I am not a scientist, but I would suspect that untold generations of attraction and physical sexual compatibility have over millennium have genetically grouped characteristics that work and at least a modicum of attraction together to provide "types" that show some less....some more....of the physical traits. Very few women I've met have them all. But in every case, they all were the proud owners of a beautiful gigantically wide and super deep vagina, and always were also able to stretch easier for entrance to their uterus canal.

This is the biggest pile of BS I've read here in a while.
Uneducated tripe.

 

[TinyPrincess]

This is the biggest pile of BS I've read here in a while.
Uneducated tripe.

BS is what build this site That and internet inches...

 

[AtYourCervix10]

i don't understand the question. it speaks of ignorance. for most women, sex is a chore regardless of size.

 

[TheExcalibur]

I've had a woman refuse to have sex with me because of the size of my penis: She did give me a blowjob at least and it wasn't bad, and I don't mind going down on women

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

As for the physical characteristics of a woman indicating her vaginal size is embarrassingly not true. If you helped deliver babies (as I have) you will learn real quick that her outside appearance has no bearing on how her vagina will stretch or not. I've seen itty bitty tiny women have a large baby without tearing and I've seen large and/or tall women need c-sections because they are so small. I know because I needed a c-section because I couldn't accommodate a small baby. I also tear during sex with my girthy husband, no matter how much foreplay or lube is used. I simply have a small vagina and meet none of the criteria listed. There are many more women like that than people realize. They just don't hang out at LPSG typically.

 

[693987]

i don't understand the question. it speaks of ignorance. for most women, sex is a chore regardless of size.

You clearly are talking to/know the wrong women.

Not a single one of the women I'm remotely close friends with has any problems with sex. Most of these women have higher libidos than their significant others, too.

 

[AlteredEgo]

This is the biggest pile of BS I've read here in a while.
Uneducated tripe.

And not a single limerick in the whole pile. I wanted a limerick.

...Most of these women have higher libidos than their significant others, too.

Yep. I know there are women out there not as into sex as we are, but I have never happened to become friends with any of them. Birds of a feather yadda yadda.

 

[AtYourCervix10]

i've never met my match.

You clearly are talking to/know the wrong women.

Not a single one of the women I'm remotely close friends with has any problems with sex. Most of these women have higher libidos than their significant others, too.

 

[AtYourCervix10]

if you were right, then every dating profile would say in the first line: "swf seeking huge cock to satisfy my insatiable sex drive" instead of what EVERY female dating profile actually says "NOT seeking hook ups, booty calls, one night stands. I'm not that type of girl."

Reality. And fact. But please continue to argue facts. It's amusing!

i do find it particularly amusing too how EVERY woman says they're "not that type of girl."

And not a single limerick in the whole pile. I wanted a limerick.
Yep. I know there are women out there not as into sex as we are, but I have never happened to become friends with any of them. Birds of a feather yadda yadda.

You clearly are talking to/know the wrong women.

Not a single one of the women I'm remotely close friends with has any problems with sex. Most of these women have higher libidos than their significant others, too.

 

[AtYourCervix10]

you can claim it as BS but i can't tell you how many women complained I was too big and how much it hurt.

BS is what build this site That and internet inches...

 

[AlteredEgo]

if you were right, then every dating profile would say in the first line: "swf seeking huge cock to satisfy my insatiable sex drive" instead of what EVERY female dating profile actually says "NOT seeking hook ups, booty calls, one night stands. I'm not that type of girl."

Reality. And fact. But please continue to argue facts. It's amusing!

i do find it particularly amusing too how EVERY woman says they're "not that type of girl."

I am definitely that type of girl. I'm in a monogamous relationship now, but when I'm not, I'm very promiscuous specifically so I can have as much sex as possible. When I had online profiles, they said that I wanted frequent casual sex, but only if there was a good mental connection, only if I felt like we could be friends someday. I'm still friends with many of them.

The women I know are the same way, just less forward and direct. They certainly do not lie about wanting it by pretending to be saintly. I'm not saying those women are not out there. I am certain they are. But if all the women I know are more like me, and all the women they know are more of the same, I have to wonder if your assertion that we do not exist is not from selection bias.

Well, that, and the fact that your personality is... well, I don't mean to be unkind, but I don't like you at all. I couldn't imagine anyone I know being willing to lay with you. If there was a nicer way to phrase that, I promise I would have put it more gently. I wouldn't say it at all but I think you need to know that you come across like a bigot, like a creep who fucks a woman's holes, not the woman herself, and even a woman who wants absolutely nothing but the D doesn't want to feel disposeable and interchangeable. You really can't appeal to the women you're looking for going about life as you do. It's not that women don't prioritize sex, it's that they don't want to with you, not in the volume you'd wish for. But keep doing the same stuff and expecting new results. Has nothing to do with me. I don't have any trouble getting laid.

 

[HungAdmirer21]

Ladies ,

I'm having some trouble on understanding what I have been told my a couple of well hung males. Is it true that women actually turn down a large cock because of its size?!?!?!?!?! I am so in love with big thick cocks I could not imagine turning one down. Have any of you experienced this? I am in total shock that someone would turn away perfection.

Smh, people fell for this troll bait seriously...

 

[693987]

I am definitely that type of girl. I'm in a monogamous relationship now, but when I'm not, I'm very promiscuous specifically so I can have as much sex as possible. When I had online profiles, they said that I wanted frequent casual sex, but only if there was a good mental connection, only if I felt like we could be friends someday. I'm still friends with many of them.



Well, that, and the fact that your personality is... well, I don't mean to be unkind, but I don't like you at all. I couldn't imagine anyone I know being willing to lay with you.

Bold parts, quoted for truth. I didn't specifically say "looking for fuck buddies" on my old profiles, but that's because damn nearly every swinging dick would have been bombarding my inbox with messages. No thanks. Just because the people I used to have as FWB/etc were people I had casual, non-monogamous sex with, doesn't mean I still didn't have to have a certain amount of tolerance for them. Not that we had to have tons of interests, but I still had to not want to strangle them if they opened their fucking mouth.

And no, not "every single dating profile" because just as there are plenty of women out there who enjoy sex a lot, and with multiple people over the same time frame, being non-monogamous/casual with sex, there are plenty of women out there who enjoy sex a lot, with their one partner, and prefer being monogamous. That doesn't mean that they don't fuck their one significant other like a rabid bunny.

As for your reality/fact. Well, I am in fact speaking AS A WOMAN, about what my preferences are. Just like AE is. So no, your "fact" is so much bupkis. I'm not arguing. I'm stating.

 

[TinyPrincess]

you can claim it as BS but i can't tell you how many women complained I was too big and how much it hurt.

You can't imagine how many guys I've met who complained about women being unable to handle them and their monster cocks only to fall flat on their faces when they pull out their "huge" 5" dicks

 

[965025]

I am definitely that type of girl. I'm in a monogamous relationship now, but when I'm not, I'm very promiscuous specifically so I can have as much sex as possible. When I had online profiles, they said that I wanted frequent casual sex, but only if there was a good mental connection, only if I felt like we could be friends someday. I'm still friends with many of them.

The women I know are the same way, just less forward and direct. They certainly do not lie about wanting it by pretending to be saintly. I'm not saying those women are not out there. I am certain they are. But if all the women I know are more like me, and all the women they know are more of the same, I have to wonder if your assertion that we do not exist is not from selection bias.

Well, that, and the fact that your personality is... well, I don't mean to be unkind, but I don't like you at all. I couldn't imagine anyone I know being willing to lay with you. If there was a nicer way to phrase that, I promise I would have put it more gently. I wouldn't say it at all but I think you need to know that you come across like a bigot, like a creep who fucks a woman's holes, not the woman herself, and even a woman who wants absolutely nothing but the D doesn't want to feel disposeable and interchangeable. You really can't appeal to the women you're looking for going about life as you do. It's not that women don't prioritize sex, it's that they don't want to with you, not in the volume you'd wish for. But keep doing the same stuff and expecting new results. Has nothing to do with me. I don't have any trouble getting laid.

I called an escort yesterday and offered her by asking her to orgasm.

 

[965025]

I called an escort yesterday and offered her by asking her to orgasm.

Woops. Offended her by asking her to orgasm. She got really nasty and insulting. She called me gay. Said that I couldn't please a woman and that is why I was calling escorts. Honestly, how the fuck you gonna say no to a man offering to pay you to cum?

 

[AlteredEgo]

Woops. Offended her by asking her to orgasm. She got really nasty and insulting. She called me gay. Said that I couldn't please a woman and that is why I was calling escorts. Honestly, how the fuck you gonna say no to a man offering to pay you to cum?

I dunno. I mean, I am not an escort, so the paying part would offend me, but if it was my gig, asking me to try to enjoy it wouldn't make me mad. If I couldn't enjoy it, I would pretend. I mean... whatever is gonna make the customer return.

 

[965025]

I dunno. I mean, I am not an escort, so the paying part would offend me, but if it was my gig, asking me to try to enjoy it wouldn't make me mad. If I couldn't enjoy it, I would pretend. I mean... whatever is gonna make the customer return.

Exactly. I was like, im giving you a fucking bonus, a real ass perk, and you call me gay? Im saying I want you to show me what you enjoy, tell me, and what you enjoy is calling me a gay trick? WTF is that?

 

[MickeyLee]

you can always 2 stars her on Yelp!

 

[jaap_stam]

you can always 2 stars her on Yelp!

I don't think they let you list escorts on yelp. Try theeroticreview.com